The issue of rising housing prices is a complex one, influenced by a variety of economic and political factors. The imbalance between supply and demand plays a significant role in driving up housing costs, with a growing population, land prices, and construction expenses all contributing to the problem. Government interventions, such as zoning regulations and import tariffs on construction materials, can further restrict the supply of new housing units and drive prices higher.

On the other hand, government policies aimed at promoting homeownership, such as mortgage subsidies and tax deductions for mortgage interest, can also impact housing demand and prices. The net effect of these interventions is often difficult to determine, as they can have conflicting outcomes on different segments of the population.

One fundamental question that is often overlooked is why governments should favor certain groups of homeowners over others. When house prices rise, existing homeowners may benefit from increased property values, while new buyers face higher costs. Government interventions that aim to lower housing prices may inadvertently discriminate against certain individuals, such as new homeowners or those looking to downsize.

Critics of government intervention, such as James Buchanan and Anthony de Jasay, argue that such policies are inherently discriminatory and lead to arbitrary redistribution of resources. They advocate for a more general approach to government intervention, one that avoids favoritism and ensures equal treatment for all citizens.

In the end, the market is seen as a more efficient mechanism for determining the value of housing, as voluntary exchanges between individuals allow for mutually beneficial transactions. Coercive measures by governments to manipulate housing prices are viewed as authoritarian and unnecessary.

In conclusion, the complexity of government interventions in the housing market highlights the need for a more hands-off approach. By allowing market forces to determine prices and avoiding discriminatory policies, governments can better serve the interests of all citizens. As the Marquis d’Argenson famously said, “Laissez faire, morbleu! Laissez faire!” (Let it be, for God’s sake! Let it be!).