CBS News‘ “60 Minutes” faced backlash recently over its editing of an interview with Vice President Kamala Harris, prompting a response from the show to former President Trump and other critics.

In a statement released on Sunday evening, “60 Minutes” refuted Trump’s accusations of deceitful editing, stating that the excerpt of the interview used on “Face the Nation” included a longer section of Harris’ response to a question compared to the segment aired on “60 Minutes.” The show emphasized its commitment to clarity, accuracy, and staying on point when editing interviews, regardless of the interviewee.

The controversy arose after Trump criticized the program for its handling of the Harris interview and subsequently declined to appear on the show, despite having previously agreed to do so. Social media buzzed with criticism from Trump supporters, accusing “60 Minutes” of manipulating Harris’ responses to benefit her.

It is not uncommon for teasers of interviews to feature different segments of a response than the final edited version that airs. However, in today’s social media-driven landscape, where viewers can easily compare different video clips, such editing tactics can lead to scrutiny and backlash. In the case of the Harris interview, discrepancies between the teaser and the actual segment raised questions about the editing process at CBS News.

Responding to Trump’s critique, “60 Minutes” extended an invitation for him to discuss the matter further on their program, emphasizing their willingness to address the issues facing the nation and the specifics of the Harris interview.

Overall, the incident sheds light on the challenges of editing interviews for television news programs in an era where audience scrutiny and social media sharing can amplify any perceived discrepancies. As “60 Minutes” navigates this controversy, the show remains committed to upholding journalistic standards and providing viewers with accurate and insightful reporting.