Conspiracy Theorists Accuse FBI of Sharing 'Bogus' Evidence After Kash Patel Reveals 'Anti-ICE' Engraved Bullet Following Dallas Shooting

Kash Patel has found himself under intense scrutiny once more after making critical comments on X, where he displayed a photo of an “anti-ICE” bullet casing he asserted was found at the site of a tragic shooting incident in Texas.

Conspiracy theorists have now suggested that the FBI is manipulating evidence in an effort to construct a narrative aimed at implicating Democrats.

The alarming incident unfolded on September 24 when a sniper opened fire at an ICE detention center in Dallas, resulting in the death of one detainee and leaving two others critically wounded. The shooter, later identified as Joshua Jahn, was found deceased due to a self-inflicted gunshot wound.

In the aftermath, Patel quickly took to social media to share what he claimed were pieces of evidence related to the shooting, including a shell casing reportedly marked with the phrase “anti-ICE.”

He stated: “While the investigation is ongoing, an initial review of the evidence shows an ideological motive behind this attack. These politically motivated assaults on law enforcement are not isolated incidents. Just two months ago, near Prarieland, Texas, an individual ambushed a different ICE facility, targeting its officers.”

Continuing in his address, he asserted: “It must come to an end, and the FBI, alongside our partners, will lead the charge in bringing those who target our law enforcement to justice… Fortunately, no law enforcement personnel were injured. I ask everyone to pray for the injured and the deceased.”

However, Patel faced fierce backlash from social media users for his hasty remarks regarding the ongoing investigation. One user slammed, “Should the FBI director really be posting potential evidence of a crime on social media merely minutes after it occurred?” Another added with sarcasm, “Did you write it yourself?” while another commented, “Nobody believes this. Perhaps engaging in a real investigation would be more appropriate than posting supposed evidence on Twitter.”

Even gun control advocate Fred Guttenberg, who experienced personal tragedy in the 2018 Parkland school shooting, shared his view, stating: “If you are serious about solving this, you should focus on earnest investigative efforts and not release potentially misleading information.”

Details surrounding the shooter, 29-year-old Jahn, and the other victims remain scarce, as law enforcement preferred to refrain from answering questions during a press briefing on the day Patel chose to publicize the evidence on social media.

Patel’s controversial history with investigations is not new. Following the murder of Charlie Kirk, Patel prematurely announced on X that the suspect involved was in custody. Just hours later, it became clear that the individual had been released post-interrogation, leading to a retraction from Patel which stated, “The subject in custody has been let go, and our inquiry continues. We aim to maintain transparency in all our communications.”

Sources suggest that even Attorney General Pam Bondi has expressed discontent about Patel’s influence, mentioning to Fox News: “The White House, as well as Bondi and (Todd) Blanche, harbor no faith in Kash. Pam particularly finds him intolerable.” Despite these claims, both Bondi and Blanche have publicly dismissed allegations of losing confidence in Patel, and the White House has denied any consideration of removing him from his position.