On September 10th, prior to the tragic event that claimed the life of Charlie Kirk, the media outlet Jezebel reportedly organized a gathering of witches to cast a hex on him, subsequently publishing a story surrounding the ritual.
In a recent update, Megyn Kelly elaborated on this bizarre narrative, revealing that both Charlie and Erika Kirk were well aware of the witchcraft plot, leaving Erika particularly unsettled. In response, they sought solace from a priest, bringing him over for prayers and divine protection over Charlie.
The tragic conclusion of this saga is now known.
As it unfolds, one of the witches allegedly involved in this spellcasting has expressed remorse—a sentiment that feels rather too late for the circumstances at hand.
From The Blast, via Yahoo News:
A Witch Claims to Regret Cursing Charlie Kirk
This month, the unsettling intersection of witchcraft and American politics reached a chilling peak as one self-described witch publically revealed her regret over participating in a curse believed to be aimed at conservative activist Charlie Kirk.
Post the shocking assassination at Utah Valley University, the witch, identifying herself as Priestess Lilin, stated she never intended for her actions to lead to harm. She has now reached out to Charlie’s grieving widow, Erika.
As one of the witches allegedly contacted by Jezebel prior to the tragic event, Lilin expressed her unintentional role in the situation’s tragic turn.
“We regret any distress this has caused,” Lilin remarked in dialogue with the Daily Mail. “Our work is pursued with an impartial lens and at a professional standard. We respect the widow’s feelings and look forward to a private discussion to address her queries.”
This type of reflection seems a tad late—perhaps consideration should have come before conjuring malevolent intentions towards another individual.
The article also features a chilling statement that should send a shiver down the spine of any person of faith:
Priestess Lilin defended her practices, asserting that they revolve around “protection and healing.” Strangely enough, she justifies controversial rituals by claiming, “Summoning demons and communicating with spirits are not inherently ‘evil acts.’” She adds, “In our spiritual community, these entities are seen as complex beings rather than just evil villains. Mediumship too is viewed as an ethically neutral exercise. Is it effective? Absolutely.”
“Not inherently evil,” she says? Is she truly serious?
No matter your beliefs, the chilling implication of this entire incident is unsettling. The invocation of spiritual forces to inflict harm on others reveals a disturbing aspect of our society today.
Mike LaChance has been an insightful contributor covering higher education and politics for Legal Insurrection since 2012. Furthermore, he has collaborated with other outlets including the Gateway Pundit, Daily Caller, and Breitbart since 2008.
You can email Mike LaChance here, and read more of Mike LaChance’s articles here.
