Commentary
President Donald Trump’s Big Beautiful Bill has sparked considerable backlash, particularly among eco-conscious members of Generation Z. They may be particularly unsettled by the increase in oil and gas development on federal lands and the repeal of fees for methane emissions. A sizable portion of this generation — over 40 percent — supports a complete transition away from fossil fuels. Yet, it’s paramount that today’s young environmentalists recognize a fundamental truth: to combat pollution effectively, society needs wealth. For the time being, environmental policy must prioritize affordable fossil fuels to preserve the economic resources required for future innovation.
Historically, genuine environmentalism has predominantly been a pursuit available to the affluent. For many, the pressing question has always been: Will the land provide sustenance next year? Are we assured of a fruitful harvest for our families?
This fact becomes glaringly evident when we consider regions like Sub-Saharan Africa, where biomass fuels, such as wood and dung, remain essential energy sources. Similarly, some of the world’s most polluted cities, nestled within the Indus Valley in India and Pakistan, attest to economies still in their industrial infancy. When was the last time climate activists implored Pakistan to adopt a Green New Deal?
The remarkable rise in human material wealth can be attributed to our capacity for cheap energy production. The more developed nations mustn’t cut off access to the very resources that propelled their own success.
It is often the wealthier, industrialized Western nations that face scrutiny from climate change activists simply because they have the capacity to deal with such concerns. When society has attained a high standard of living through fossil fuels, it becomes feasible to invest in cleaner energy solutions. This translates into commitment and resources for extensive research over years and billions invested, allowing American and European countries to take the lead in electric vehicle technology, solar energy advancements, and more.
Modern conveniences, which we so effortlessly enjoy today, stem from consistent access to energy. The average individual possesses cell phones, computers, lives in climate-controlled spaces, drives cars, and can navigate the digital knowledge repository known as the internet. All of these amenities hinge on energy availability.
Even those categorized as “poor” in the U.S. and Europe benefit from affordable energy sources. Streetlights remain lit, and social welfare efforts receive funding through taxes collected from wealthier brackets. Very few people in these regions endure a truly subsistence-level existence. Our security today allows us to ponder long-term issues because our immediate needs are sufficiently met. However, the situation shifts dramatically if energy supplies become unreliable, as demonstrated by recent blackouts in Spain and South Africa.
The prosperity that our society has achieved enables a spirit of innovation; however, people’s enthusiasm for environmental initiatives wanes when their financial realities become precarious. Research published in a 2022 issue of the Journal of Cleaner Production illustrates that economically strained middle-class families often engage in more environmentally harmful practices due to the pressure of keeping up with daily expenses. Environmental regulations that disproportionately impact this demographic could prove detrimental.
Currently, Americans have adjusted to the inconveniences posed by initiatives like fluorescent light bulbs and eco-conscious straws because their lives have become increasingly comfortable. Yet, states like California are imposing renewable energy mandates, resulting in electricity costs that are a staggering 80 percent higher than the national average, which places the most significant burden on middle- and low-income citizens. New York similarly struggles with energy prices exceeding 50 percent above the national average.
These figures highlight only the immediate costs of energy. When you consider energy’s role as an input across almost all goods and services, the cumulative financial impact becomes apparent. Repeated pressures on everyday Americans could swiftly shift their focus away from overarching issues like climate change toward the survival of their households. Generation Z, who are on the brink of establishing families and careers, will find themselves caught in the delicate balance between environmental consciousness and financial stability.
Those fortunate enough to have lived without existential threats should tread cautiously when suggesting the abandonment of the pillars that uphold our prosperity. The necessity for cleaner energy is undeniable; no one wishes to witness factories emitting noxious fumes or oil spills decimating marine ecosystems. However, stifling growth or imposing austerity on energy consumption isn’t the answer. Industry must be freed from constraints, enabling market forces to create more efficient, accessible alternatives.
In the end, maintaining public interest in environmental preservation will hinge on ensuring people feel secure in their prosperity. Therefore, Gen Z voters should champion environmental strategies that embrace the spirit of the Big Beautiful Bill, allowing humanity to utilize the environment responsibly, paving the way for genuine sustainability down the road.
From RealClearWire
If you found this article interesting, please consider supporting traditional journalism
Our first edition was published 25 years ago from a basement in Atlanta. Today, The Epoch Times brings fact-based, award-winning journalism to millions of Americans.
Our journalists have been threatened, arrested, and assaulted, but our commitment to independent journalism has never wavered. This year marks our 25th year of independent reporting, free from corporate and political influence.
That’s why you’re invited to a limited-time introductory offer — just $1 per week — so you can join millions already celebrating independent news.
