Defense Seeks to Suppress Evidence in Luigi Mangione Murder Trial
Luigi Mangione’s legal team is pushing to prevent the Manhattan District Attorney’s Office from presenting key pieces of evidence in his upcoming murder trial. Among the items they are seeking to have thrown out is a 9 mm handgun that prosecutors claim matches the weapon used in the December 4, 2024, killing in New York City. Another crucial piece of evidence targeted for exclusion is a journal in which Mangione allegedly detailed his intention to “wack” the 50-year-old victim.
The defense argues that the gun, notebook, and other items should not be admitted in court because they were found in Mangione’s backpack without a proper search warrant. Mangione, a University of Pennsylvania graduate, was charged with the murder of the victim, who was shot outside a Midtown Manhattan hotel while on his way to a conference.
After a five-day manhunt, Mangione was apprehended at a McDonald’s in Altoona, Pennsylvania, where authorities discovered the gun, multiple IDs, and a manifesto in his possession. The defense team is also seeking to suppress certain statements Mangione made to investigators, claiming that police began questioning him without first reading him his Miranda rights.
The legal battle over the admissibility of evidence in Mangione’s trial is shaping up to be a critical point of contention. As the case moves forward, both sides will continue to argue over the validity and legality of the evidence that could potentially sway the outcome of the trial.

