Friday, 31 Oct 2025
  • Contact
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms & Conditions
  • DMCA
logo logo
  • World
  • Politics
  • Crime
  • Economy
  • Tech & Science
  • Sports
  • Entertainment
  • More
    • Education
    • Celebrities
    • Culture and Arts
    • Environment
    • Health and Wellness
    • Lifestyle
  • 🔥
  • Trump
  • VIDEO
  • House
  • White
  • ScienceAlert
  • Trumps
  • Watch
  • man
  • Health
  • Season
Font ResizerAa
American FocusAmerican Focus
Search
  • World
  • Politics
  • Crime
  • Economy
  • Tech & Science
  • Sports
  • Entertainment
  • More
    • Education
    • Celebrities
    • Culture and Arts
    • Environment
    • Health and Wellness
    • Lifestyle
Follow US
© 2024 americanfocus.online – All Rights Reserved.
American Focus > Blog > Economy > Adam Smith Would not Approve
Economy

Adam Smith Would not Approve

Last updated: April 10, 2025 8:06 am
Share
Adam Smith Would not Approve
SHARE

Recently, someone inquired about the ramifications of the world descending into a trade war due to the tariffs announced in the Rose Garden. I jokingly remarked that either Adam Smith would be proven incorrect or we would all find ourselves poorer. This notion holds true even with the reduced tariffs, which still see American tariffs soaring higher than they have in a century.

In response, as is often the case, they referenced Adam Smith’s rationale for tariffs, drawn from Book 4, Chapter 2 of Wealth of Nations. However, these arguments are a distraction, as we shall explore. Let’s examine how they apply to our current situation.

Smith identifies two scenarios where managing trade can be justified: firstly, in shipping, due to its connection to military defense, and secondly, by imposing taxes on imports equal to those on domestic goods to ensure fair competition. Furthermore, trade restrictions should not be outright condemned when (A) they are retaliatory tariffs or (B) when transitioning towards free trade.

So, what’s the fuss? Retaliatory tariffs are indeed on the list. Why would the Rose Garden tariffs irritate Adam Smith?

Smith explicitly outlines the conditions under which retaliatory tariffs are acceptable. He states, “There may be good policy in retaliations of this kind, when there is a probability that they will procure the repeal of the high duties or prohibitions complained of.” (IV.ii.39) In simpler terms, retaliatory tariffs are justified only if they lead to freer trade. Israel’s recent removal of tariffs against the United States did not protect them. Similarly, when Vietnam and the European Union proposed eliminating all tariffs, the administration dismissed these offers as inadequate. If these were meant to be retaliatory, they have utterly failed.

See also  Taxing the Rich: It's Complicated

However, the Rose Garden tariffs were never truly retaliatory. They did not arise from how much other countries impose tariffs on the United States, nor were they influenced by non-tariff barriers. The White House confirmed that the tariffs were calculated using the trade deficit divided by U.S. imports from that country, further divided by two (unless a country maintains a trade surplus with the U.S., in which case the tariff was set at 10%).

This indicates that the focus is not on retaliation but, at best, on a negative trade balance. And we all know what Adam Smith thought about the balance of trade, don’t we?

“Nothing, however, can be more absurd than this whole doctrine of the balance of trade, upon which, not only these restraints, but almost all the other regulations of commerce are founded. When two places trade with one another, this doctrine supposes that, if the balance be even, neither of them either loses or gains; but if it leans in any degree to one side, that one of them loses and the other gains in proportion to its declension from the exact equilibrium. Both suppositions are false.” (WN IV.iii.a)

In truth, Adam Smith’s arguments regarding tariffs serve as a red herring when it comes to understanding his perspective on these tariffs.

The announcement of the tariffs from the Rose Garden did not merely hike the costs of international trade. As Thomas Sowell noted, this declaration also incited uncertainty, making foreign investment and globally integrated supply chains more precarious—riskier—just as the tariffs themselves elevate the costs of international trade. The cumulative effect of these policies is akin to the impact of all trade restrictions: they contract the global market. Transactions that would have been economically viable become prohibitively expensive and simply don’t occur.

See also  Baidu Q3 2024 earnings:

At the heart of Adam Smith’s economic philosophy is the idea that the wealth of nations springs from the division of labor (Book 1, Chapter 1), a process made possible by our innate tendency to truck, barter, and exchange (Book 1, Chapter 2). This division of labor is constrained by the number of individuals among whom labor can be divided, a concept Smith refers to as the “extent of the market” (Book 1, Chapter 3).

Therefore, if we believe that the tariff announcement in the Rose Garden will not lead to a decline in our overall wealth due to the reduction in potential trades—and thus a shrinking market—then we must conclude that the division of labor is not the source of national wealth. If the Rose Garden tariffs do not result in a poorer society, then Adam Smith must indeed be mistaken about everything.

And if Smith was wrong about everything, why should we take his views on tariffs seriously?

 

Related content:

CEE Entries: Protectionism, Mercantilism
WealthofTweets: Book 4, Chapter 2
WealthOfTweets: Book 4 Chapter 3
Jon Murphy, The Political Problem of Tariffs

 

TAGGED:AdamApproveSmith
Share This Article
Twitter Email Copy Link Print
Previous Article The Violent and Sensual Bodies of Galli The Violent and Sensual Bodies of Galli
Next Article Sicko sought for allegedly sexually abusing corpse on NYC subway: sources Sicko sought for allegedly sexually abusing corpse on NYC subway: sources
Leave a comment

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Popular Posts

My Weekly Reading and Viewing for July 6, 2025

For the next 19 days, my travels will limit my posting frequency. Cincinnati’s Beer-Loving Germans…

July 6, 2025

Decision of the President and Statement of Reasons on 2025 Ambler Road Appeal

I hereby grant approval for the appeal submitted by the Alaska Industrial Development and Export…

October 6, 2025

Donald Trump claims Israel and Iran have agreed ceasefire

Unlock the White House Watch newsletter for free Your guide to what Trump’s second term…

June 23, 2025

A 529 account can make saving for your child’s future go farther

With the rising cost of college tuition, many families are finding it increasingly challenging to…

June 1, 2025

WATCH: AG Pam Bondi, FBI Director Kash Patel, DHS Secretary Kristi Noem Vow to Take Down “Terrorist Group” Antifa – “They are an Organized, Systemic, International Criminal Enterprise” | The Gateway Pundit | by Jordan Conradson

Attorney General Pam Bondi, FBI Director Kash Patel, and Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem recently…

October 11, 2025

You Might Also Like

29 truck carrier files Chapter 11
Economy

29 truck carrier files Chapter 11

October 31, 2025
Trust Government Statistics, Not Government
Economy

Trust Government Statistics, Not Government

October 31, 2025
Jefferies Raises BP Price Target to 420 GBp, Maintains Hold Rating
Economy

Jefferies Raises BP Price Target to 420 GBp, Maintains Hold Rating

October 31, 2025
Dan Ives’ AI ETF Hits B in Assets Just Five Months After Launch
Economy

Dan Ives’ AI ETF Hits $1B in Assets Just Five Months After Launch

October 31, 2025
logo logo
Facebook Twitter Youtube

About US


Explore global affairs, political insights, and linguistic origins. Stay informed with our comprehensive coverage of world news, politics, and Lifestyle.

Top Categories
  • Crime
  • Environment
  • Sports
  • Tech and Science
Usefull Links
  • Contact
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms & Conditions
  • DMCA

© 2024 americanfocus.online –  All Rights Reserved.

Welcome Back!

Sign in to your account

Lost your password?