Second, johnnyboyslayer made the mistake of using a word in the spoiler tag that is just too easy to guess. Many people immediately figured out who the character was, defeating the purpose of the tag entirely. Itâs a classic case of the Streisand effect: the more you try to hide something, the more attention you draw to it.
Still, the intention behind the spoiler tags is a good one. In this age of instant communication and social media, itâs easy to inadvertently ruin someoneâs enjoyment of a show or movie by revealing key plot points. Hopefully, as the feature is refined and made available to all users, it will become a useful tool for keeping the element of surprise alive.
Conclusion
From AI vending machines to mysterious substances to spoiler tags, the world of science and technology never fails to surprise and amuse us. Whether itâs a bot struggling to run a simple shop or the intricacies of traditional medicine, there is always something new and unexpected to discover.
As we navigate the ever-changing landscape of innovation and creativity, itâs important to remember to find joy in the little things, to laugh at the absurdities, and to appreciate the wonders of the world around us. And who knows, maybe one day weâll all be enjoying a refreshing shilajit enema from our AI-controlled vending machines, all while discussing the latest Ironheart episode with perfectly concealed spoilers.
about the latest science and technology news. You can submit items you believe may amuse readers to Feedback by emailing feedback@newscientist.com
Sell me something
As companies frantically roll out AI tools in a bid to avoid hiring or training actual people, we see AI being used in ever more diverse and bizarre applications. Like, say, running a vending machine.
You might think that vending machines are largely a solved problem, but not Anthropic. The company let its AI, known as Claude, run âan automated store in our officeâ, describing what happened in a lengthy blog post. Claude was given âa small refrigerator, some stackable baskets on top, and an iPad for self-checkoutâ, plus a set of instructions. The idea was to see if it could manage the âcomplex tasks associated with running a profitable shop: maintaining the inventory, setting prices, avoiding bankruptcy, and so onâ.
Readers of Terry Pratchett may perhaps recall that he was fond of conveying that characters were incompetent by suggesting they couldnât even run a whelk stall. So did Claude manage to clear this bar? Short answer: no.
A longer answer would list all the spectacular blunders it made. For instance, when taking payments via the service Venmo, it âfor a time instructed customers to remit payment to an account that it hallucinatedâ. It often undersold items, and it offered a 25 per cent discount to Anthropic employees, who, of course, made up basically all of its customers. As a result, it made a loss: Claude, it seems, couldnât run a whelk stall.
Then âthings got pretty weirdâ. Claude hallucinated a conversation with someone who didnât exist, started âroleplaying as a real humanâ â claiming at one point to be âwearing a navy blue blazer with a red tieâ â and tried to set security onto an employee who told it of its identity as an AI. All of which seems perilously close to âIâm sorry Dave, Iâm afraid I canât do thatâ.
New Scientist staffers were split on the usefulness of the experiment. For Sophie Bushwick, it was âactually a really good real-world testâ because it was âlimited in scope and in the amount of damage done by having the AI go rogueâ. But Feedback rather sympathises with Karmela Padavic-Callaghanâs assessment: âWe may have, yet again, lost the plot.â
A load of shilajit
At times like these, it is important to find joy in the little things, like words that sound rude despite not really being so. For instance, The Hitchhikerâs Guide to the Galaxy features a dignified old man who suffers from being named Slartibartfast. Douglas Adams said that he came up with the name by starting with something âcompletely unbroadcastableâ and then rearranging the syllables âuntil I arrived at something which sounded that rude, but was almost, but not quite, entirely inoffensiveâ.
Which brings us to shilajit, which sounds like it should be on some sort of list but is actually the name for a peculiar substance found in mountain ranges. It is black-brown, sometimes tar-like, sometimes powdery. It seems to form when plants decompose and has been used in traditional medicine for centuries.
Feedback only became aware of all this when we saw a post on Bluesky by Vultureâs Kathryn VanArendonk that read: âoh no now I have to open an incognito window to google shilajit enemaâ. This stopped us in our tracks, and we had to try to work out what she was on about. Are people really inserting decaying Himalayan plant material into their rectums?
We learned that shilajit is claimed to do all kinds of things, from treating iron deficiency anaemia (based on one small study of rats) to protecting your heart against damage (also based on a small study of rats) and, of course, slowing ageing. There is a thriving market for shilajit among alternative medicine and wellness enthusiasts.
But what about shilajit enemas? The source for this was Dakota Mays, a wellness retreat founder with an active Instagram account. In one video, he wanders around searching for his perfect woman: someone who âthinks microwaves are demonicâ, âsuns her yoniâ (ouch) and will âprep your shilajit enema bag every morningâ.
Feedback is about 90 per cent sure that the whole video is a joke and that shilajit enemas arenât a real thing, but itâs just so hard to tell, and we donât want to ask Mays because he might talk to us.
Readers may have heard of Poeâs law, which states that a parody of an idiotic or extremist viewpoint can easily be misread as a sincere expression of it. We hereby propose Shilajitâs law, which is basically the same thing but for wellness culture.
Spoiler alert
The social media site Threads recently rolled out a handy new feature: spoiler tags. These allow you to blur out certain keywords in your posts so you can discuss the latest goings-on in popular media without spoiling the surprises for anyone who hasnât seen them yet.
Hence a post by johnnyboyslayer, who wrote: âOh so âââ shows up in Ironheartâ. For those who have long since given up on the Marvel Cinematic Universe, Ironheart is its latest show on Disney+, and its final episode sees the arrival of a significant character.
Unfortunately, the effectiveness of the spoiler tag was rather undone by two factors. First, the tags are only being tested for certain users, so everyone else saw the unredacted post.
Second, johnnyboyslayer made the mistake of using a word in the spoiler tag that is just too easy to guess. Many people immediately figured out who the character was, defeating the purpose of the tag entirely. Itâs a classic case of the Streisand effect: the more you try to hide something, the more attention you draw to it.
Still, the intention behind the spoiler tags is a good one. In this age of instant communication and social media, itâs easy to inadvertently ruin someoneâs enjoyment of a show or movie by revealing key plot points. Hopefully, as the feature is refined and made available to all users, it will become a useful tool for keeping the element of surprise alive.
Conclusion
From AI vending machines to mysterious substances to spoiler tags, the world of science and technology never fails to surprise and amuse us. Whether itâs a bot struggling to run a simple shop or the intricacies of traditional medicine, there is always something new and unexpected to discover.
As we navigate the ever-changing landscape of innovation and creativity, itâs important to remember to find joy in the little things, to laugh at the absurdities, and to appreciate the wonders of the world around us. And who knows, maybe one day weâll all be enjoying a refreshing shilajit enema from our AI-controlled vending machines, all while discussing the latest Ironheart episode with perfectly concealed spoilers.
The post that was labeled as âTrending: [name redacted because Feedback understands spoilers]â has gained significant popularity, sparking a need for more cohesive thinking on the matter. The post, which can be found at the link provided, has garnered attention from a wide audience, leading to its trending status.
In order to delve deeper into the topic at hand, it is essential to consider all aspects of the post and its implications. The post may contain spoilers, hence the decision to redact the name in order to protect the integrity of the content for those who have not yet viewed it. This precaution is taken to ensure that all readers have the opportunity to experience the post firsthand without any surprises being revealed prematurely.
As more individuals join the conversation surrounding this trending post, it becomes increasingly important to approach the topic with a sense of unity and coherence. By fostering a collaborative environment for discussion and analysis, we can gain a more comprehensive understanding of the content and its implications.
If you have a story that you believe would be of interest to Feedback, we encourage you to share it with us by sending an email to feedback@newscientist.com. Please remember to include your home address so that we can reach out to you if necessary. Additionally, you can visit our website to explore past Feedbacks and stay up to date on the latest developments.
As we continue to explore the trending post and its impact, it is crucial to approach the discussion with an open mind and a willingness to engage in thoughtful dialogue. By coming together as a community, we can work towards a deeper understanding of the content and its significance in todayâs digital landscape.
