The Apple Watch Series 10: A Runner’s Perspective
I have had the privilege of testing almost every Apple Watch model, dating back to the original version. As a result, I have witnessed the evolution and improvement of its sports tracking abilities faster than most smartwatch competitors. For runners who own an iPhone and are seeking a smartwatch to run with, there are few better options than Apple’s offering.
Having tested numerous alternatives from Garmin, Samsung, and other brands, if I had to choose an Apple Watch that I trust to track my runs reliably, it would be the Watch Ultra or the Ultra 2. I have extensively used both models during months of training and racing on marathon courses known for challenging GPS conditions, such as those in London and Chicago. The Ultra series has consistently delivered exceptional performance in such demanding environments.
When Apple unveiled the Series 10 with its larger screen, I expected it to match the Ultra in sports features, especially considering its closer size to Apple’s premium Watch. However, the Series 10 fell short in some aspects. It lacked Ultra-matching battery life and the crucial feature of dual-band GPS, or Precision Start mode, which enhances tracking accuracy during outdoor activities. This feature remains exclusive to the Ultra series, at least for now.
Despite these differences, the Series 10 shares some hardware similarities with the Ultra 2, including Apple’s latest-generation optical heart rate sensor and access to advanced running metrics and custom workout options. With a spot secured in the 2024 Manchester Half Marathon, courtesy of Puma, I seized the opportunity to test the Series 10’s performance in a scenario where GPS accuracy is paramount.
Equipped with the new all-black Watch Ultra 2 on one wrist and the 46mm Series 10 on the other, I embarked on my race to evaluate Apple’s latest offering. Here’s how the Series 10 fared in comparison to the Ultra 2:
Big Love for a Bigger Display
The larger screen of the Series 10, though smaller than the Ultra 2, provided more screen real estate for running stats to be displayed comfortably. Glancing down mid-race to check progress was noticeably easier with the Series 10 compared to previous non-Ultra Apple Watches. Despite lacking an Action button like the Ultra, the Series 10’s screen size increase was a subtle enhancement that maintained the essence of previous Series Watches.
Good Data During and Post-Race
During the race, I closely monitored key data points like running pace, average pace, and distance tracking. Comparing the Series 10 and Ultra 2, both watches closely matched up in terms of these stats. While some disparity emerged in the latter half of the race, the Series 10 was not significantly off from the course markers or the Ultra 2. The average pace data and heart rate figures were nearly identical across both watches throughout the race.
Race-Fit Battery
In the past, the Apple Watch’s battery life posed challenges for longer distance races. However, the Series 10 showcased improved battery performance, easily lasting through a morning of preparation, the race itself, and the remainder of the day. While the Series 10 exhibited a slightly lower battery life compared to the Ultra 2 during the race, it still proved capable of enduring a marathon distance.
The Verdict
Despite initial skepticism, the Apple Watch Series 10 impressed with its performance, closely matching the Ultra 2 in key aspects. The integration of a larger display and reliable data tracking make the Series 10 a compelling choice for runners. Priced at £429/$429, the Series 10 offers a solid alternative to the £799/$799 Ultra 2, providing excellent value for run-lovers who prioritize a great smartwatch experience without breaking the bank.
In conclusion, the Series 10 proves that runners who desire a high-quality smartwatch, particularly those loyal to Apple Watch, can achieve excellent performance without the need to splurge on the Ultra 2 or wait for future iterations.
