Automakers Are Partnering with an Ohio Senator to Decrease Consumer Choice and Increase Pollution

Proposed Legislation Threatens Consumer Choice and Environmental Protection

Amidst the ongoing attacks on regulatory safeguards, a new bill introduced by Senator Bernie Moreno is causing concern for its potential impact on consumers and the environment. The “Transportation Freedom Act” seems to contradict its name by limiting consumer choice and weakening regulations aimed at protecting consumers and the environment from the auto industry.

The bill, supported by automotive and trucking industries, aims to restrict the consideration of electrification as a viable technology for reducing emissions and fuel use. By nullifying pollution limits and efficiency standards set based on scientific research, the bill could hinder progress in reducing vehicle pollution and increasing fuel efficiency. Additionally, the bill prioritizes industry arguments over scientific evidence and allows for arbitrary changes to standards based on industry input every two years.

One of the most concerning aspects of the bill is the “deem to comply” provision, which would allow manufacturers to only comply with the least protective regulation in any given year. This provision could enable manufacturers to bypass compliance with the Clean Air Act, putting public health and the environment at risk.

Industry’s Track Record of Non-Compliance

The bill’s support from major automakers like General Motors, Stellantis, and Toyota raises questions about the industry’s commitment to environmental and consumer protection. General Motors, in particular, has a history of opposing safety and emissions regulations, showcasing a lack of concern for the impact of their products on public health and safety.

Stellantis has faced financial troubles and scandals related to emissions cheating, highlighting a pattern of non-compliance with regulations. Toyota, once seen as an environmental leader, has shifted its focus away from fuel efficiency and environmental stewardship in recent years, raising concerns about its commitment to sustainability.

While the industry may benefit from the bill’s provisions in the short term, the long-term consequences could be detrimental. By undermining regulations and stifling innovation, the bill threatens to weaken the domestic auto manufacturing sector and hinder its competitiveness on a global scale.

The Cost of Industry-Friendly Legislation

The “Transportation Freedom Act” may benefit industry stakeholders in the short term, but the costs to consumers, labor, and communities could be significant. Consumers may face limited choices and higher costs due to reduced competition and innovation in the auto industry. Labor may suffer from job losses and decreased investment in domestic manufacturing, as industry incentives shift away from technological advancement and sustainability.

Communities already burdened by transportation pollution, particularly from freight, may bear the brunt of the bill’s impact. By rolling back regulations aimed at reducing emissions from trucks and vehicles, the bill could worsen air quality and health outcomes for vulnerable populations.

Conclusion

In its current form, the “Transportation Freedom Act” prioritizes industry interests over consumer and environmental protection. By limiting regulations, stifling innovation, and weakening environmental standards, the bill poses a threat to public health, consumer choice, and the competitiveness of the domestic auto manufacturing sector. It is essential to consider the long-term consequences of industry-friendly legislation and prioritize policies that promote sustainability, innovation, and consumer welfare.