Guest contribution by Martel Maxim. Originally published at JoeHoft.com – republished with permission.
Colorado’s Legal Battle: A Small Win for Tina Peters Against the DOJ
In a notable development today, the Colorado legal establishment, allegedly entwined with globalist interests, faced a setback as they failed to dismiss a Department of Justice (DOJ) inquiry concerning Tina Peters. This outcome is being celebrated as a significant triumph for the pursuit of justice. Prior to this ruling, Colorado’s Attorney General, Phil Weiser, often labeled as an Insurgent Marxist by critics, made valiant yet ultimately futile attempts to prevent the case from being examined. His last-minute justifications resembled excuses from a grade schooler trying to explain why homework wasn’t turned in—unconvincing and quite transparent.
Judicial Proceedings: A Delayed Decision
During the hearing today, the judge opted not to side with the usual narrative that tends to silence dissenting voices like Peters. Instead, he postponed the decision for a week, allowing both parties to gather more compelling evidence. Central to the hearing is the DOJ’s inquiry into whether the case is “more oriented toward inflicting political pain than pursuing actual justice or legitimate governmental objectives.” This line of questioning echoes the sentiments of Executive Order 14147, aimed at curtailing the weaponization of federal power.
Next week, the DOJ will have the chance to present substantial evidence suggesting that the prosecution of Clerk Peters was less about justice and more about political vendetta. The original trial saw remarkable efforts by the judge and prosecutor to obscure alleged perjury by witness Gerald Wood, but evidence leaked through various channels undermined their efforts, leading the jury to dismiss three related charges against Peters.
Unveiling the Truth: Evidence Concealed
Regrettably, similar exculpatory evidence relating to the remaining seven charges was successfully hidden from the jury. In an equitable trial, it stands to reason that Peters would have been exonerated entirely. The intent to inflict pain on her character and reputation is glaringly evident, aimed at covering up the systemic failures within the election process.
The trial proceedings were extensively recorded, revealing a clear violation of Peters’ civil rights, which were weaponized against her throughout the trial that culminated in a nine-year prison sentence. Detailed accounts of these civil rights violations can be found in her Writ of Habeas Corpus submitted in Colorado.
The Allegations: Upholding Integrity or Breaking Laws?
So, what were the alleged “crimes” committed by Clerk Peters? Simply put, she upheld her oath by safeguarding election records that the Colorado Secretary of State, Jena Griswold, had unlawfully destroyed. This destruction included crucial documentation from the 2020 General and 2021 Municipal Elections in Mesa County. One might ponder who should truly be facing legal consequences here, and that critical discussion was notably absent from Peters’ trial.
Furthermore, let’s not overlook the “Password Gate” scandal, where Secretary Griswold allegedly disclosed over 600 active election passwords statewide without repercussions, contrasting sharply with the prosecution’s focus on an expired password linked to Peters, which she never authorized to be shared. The hypocrisy is glaring when considering the DOJ’s own question regarding the legitimacy of the prosecution’s motives.
Political Message or Justice? The Real Agenda
In their rush to make an example of Peters before the upcoming November 2024 Presidential Election, the prosecution disregarded evidence and witnesses that could have cleared her name. They painted her as someone seeking fame and fortune, dismissively labeling her a “Charlatan and Snake Oil Salesman.” Meanwhile, DA Rubinstein openly admitted the intent behind Peters’ incarceration was to serve as a warning to other election officials against questioning electoral integrity—a blatant admission of the infringement on her First Amendment rights.
Ultimately, it is evident that Peters’ trial, conviction, and sentencing were primarily designed to inflict political pain rather than pursue justice. This serves as a warning to other election officials about the consequences of exposing potential fraud in their jurisdictions, particularly with the 2024 Presidential Election looming. The case against Peters is rife with opportunities for the DOJ to expose the truth, and the forthcoming hearings may very well tip the scales against AG Weiser.
The Bigger Picture: A Dam of Lies
One might wonder why figures like AG Weiser, SOS Griswold, and DA Rubinstein are so fervently invested in maintaining the facade of the status quo. The answer lies in the complex layers of deception that bind them to Peters’ case. Like a dam of lies, once it starts to crack, the collapse is inevitable. Their desperation is palpable; they won’t even grant Peters bail while her appeal is pending, despite her being an individual with no prior offenses. To delve deeper into Tina’s backstory, visit https://tinapeters.us/ and watch the one-hour documentary “Selection Code” linked on her homepage.
In addition, this Thursday at 11:00 AM Eastern Time, Steve Stern from https://sternamerican.com/ will host a global engagement event aiming to raise awareness for Tina, featuring numerous prominent podcasters. The livestream can be viewed HERE.
The manipulation of electoral processes is critical to maintaining power, and the corrupt leadership in Colorado is at the center of this cover-up. They cannot afford any significant breaches in their narrative, but today’s developments hint at emerging cracks. With the DOJ poised to present compelling evidence in the upcoming hearing, the stability of their dam of lies may soon be tested.
