CNN’s Van Jones recently participated in a roundtable discussion for The New York Times, where he highlighted the growing influence of digital media in shaping political outcomes. Jones emphasized that the mainstream media and political class have failed to grasp the significance of digital platforms, particularly in Donald Trump’s victory.
Jones pointed out that digital media serves as the modern equivalent of door-knocking, reaching audiences in a 24-hour digital surround sound that bypasses traditional news outlets like CNN. He shared an anecdote about his teenage son’s influencers, who are unknown to him but have significant followings on platforms like Twitch, Kick, and Rumble. Jones acknowledged that the mainstream media has become fringe, while fringe platforms have gained mainstream prominence.
Furthermore, Jones acknowledged Donald Trump’s strategic use of digital media and influencers like Charlie Kirk and Elon Musk in his election campaign. He admitted that Trump had outsmarted the entire political class and leveraged a massive media ecosystem that propelled him to power. Jones emphasized that Trump’s success was not due to stupidity but rather a keen understanding of digital media and the support of influential figures like Musk.
In a separate interview with Chris Cillizza, Jones reiterated his admiration for Trump’s political acumen and highlighted the former president’s significant achievements in building a loyal following and media empire. He emphasized that Trump’s power and influence surpass that of any other individual in recent history, leaving critics and political analysts looking foolish in comparison.
Overall, Jones’ comments underscore a growing realization among Democrats that their monopoly on the truth is no longer sustainable. The decline of legacy media and the rise of digital platforms have reshaped the political landscape, challenging traditional narratives and power structures. As Democrats come to terms with this new reality, they must adapt to the evolving media landscape or risk becoming irrelevant in shaping public opinion and electoral outcomes.
