Friday, 31 Oct 2025
  • Contact
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms & Conditions
  • DMCA
logo logo
  • World
  • Politics
  • Crime
  • Economy
  • Tech & Science
  • Sports
  • Entertainment
  • More
    • Education
    • Celebrities
    • Culture and Arts
    • Environment
    • Health and Wellness
    • Lifestyle
  • 🔥
  • Trump
  • VIDEO
  • House
  • White
  • ScienceAlert
  • Trumps
  • Watch
  • man
  • Health
  • Season
Font ResizerAa
American FocusAmerican Focus
Search
  • World
  • Politics
  • Crime
  • Economy
  • Tech & Science
  • Sports
  • Entertainment
  • More
    • Education
    • Celebrities
    • Culture and Arts
    • Environment
    • Health and Wellness
    • Lifestyle
Follow US
© 2024 americanfocus.online – All Rights Reserved.
American Focus > Blog > Politics > Danish Scientist Bribed by Dr. Fauci to Say COVID Did NOT Come From a Wuhan Lab May Flee the Country Before He Is Called to Testify in DOJ Investigation |
Politics

Danish Scientist Bribed by Dr. Fauci to Say COVID Did NOT Come From a Wuhan Lab May Flee the Country Before He Is Called to Testify in DOJ Investigation |

Last updated: June 12, 2025 6:00 am
Share
Danish Scientist Bribed by Dr. Fauci to Say COVID Did NOT Come From a Wuhan Lab May Flee the Country Before He Is Called to Testify in DOJ Investigation |
SHARE

Dr. Tony Fauci and Dr. Kristian Andersen, who allegedly altered his stance on the origins of COVID-19 after receiving funding.

Legal eagles within the Bondi Justice Department have embarked on an investigation into one of the Centers for Research in Emerging Infectious Diseases (CREID) grants awarded to Scripps Research Institute scientist Kristian Andersen by Dr. Tony Fauci in 2020.

Andersen appears to be preparing for an escape, reportedly seeking a newly created position at the University of Oslo, perhaps to avoid scrutiny as the investigations unfold.

Dr. Kristian Andersen may have reason to be anxious.

In a questionable turn of events in 2020, Dr. Tony Fauci allegedly influenced Andersen to change his public position regarding the COVID-19 lab leak theory. Following a conversation with Fauci on February 1, 2020, Andersen received a substantial $1.88 million grant, in addition to $16.5 million in funding from NIAID, which some might call Fauci’s personal slush fund.

As previously reported by in 2023 and 2024…

On January 31, 2020, the Danish-born and British-educated scientist Kristian Andersen emailed Dr. Fauci, expressing concerns that the virus appeared to be lab-engineered.

In that email (emphasis added):

“[O]ne has to look really closely at all the sequences to see that some of the features (potentially) look engineered . . . . Eddie [Holmes], Bob [Garry], Mike [Ferguson], and myself all find the genome inconsistent with evolutionary theory.”

Source: Oversight Committee Final Report, p. 10

However, by February 4, 2020, after his conversation with Fauci, Andersen had a change of heart, declaring the lab leak theory to be a baseless conspiracy.

Kristian Andersen stated, “The main crackpot theories going around at the moment relate to this virus being somehow engineered… and that is demonstrably false.”

See also  Trump turns up the pressure on Indiana Republicans to redistrict
Source: Oversight Committee — Letter to Anderson

So what transpired between January 31 and February 4, 2020?

It seems Dr. Anthony Fauci had a chat with Dr. Kristian Andersen, persuading him to publicly assert that the COVID-19 virus was not of laboratory origin, accompanied by the enticing offer of a hefty grant from the NIH.

The New York Times later reported on Andersen’s initial email to Fauci in a June 2021 article.

Over the past year, Dr. Andersen has been one of the most vocal advocates of the theory that the coronavirus originated from a natural spillover from animals to humans outside of a lab. However, in his January 2020 email to Fauci, he had not yet arrived at that conclusion. He expressed to Fauci, the top infectious disease expert in the government, that some features of the virus led him to suspect it might have been engineered, and noted that he and his colleagues were planning to investigate further by analyzing the virus’s genome.

They published their findings in a scientific journal on March 17, 2020, concluding that a laboratory origin was very unlikely. Since then, Andersen has reiterated this perspective in interviews and on Twitter, placing him in the middle of the ongoing debate about whether the virus might have leaked from a Chinese lab.

When the email exchange with Fauci was made public, the media frenzy around Dr. Andersen escalated, prompting him to deactivate his Twitter account. He did respond to inquiries from The New York Times about the email and the ensuing controversy, which has been edited for brevity.

As previously noted by in March 2023, Dr. Andersen changed his narrative just four days after conversing with Fauci.

See also  Musk’s decision to limit political spending leaves some Republicans cold

However, The New York Times conveniently left out that after his February 1 conversation with Fauci, Dr. Andersen received a $1.88 million grant and $16.5 million in NIAID funding, which many would deem highly suspicious.

Dr. Andrew Huff testified about this in 2022, revealing it in a legal report crafted by the Renz Law Group.

Dr. Huff disclosed that Andersen’s funding at the Scripps Research Institute surged from $393,079 monthly to $800,139 after he retracted his stance on the COVID lab leak theory.
(page 56)

Screenshot

This was highlighted by Mises Caucus on social media.

The man on the left is Kristian Andersen, a British scientist who emailed Fauci 1/31/20, saying the virus looks lab-made. The man on the right is Kristian Andersen, the guy who Fauci called on 2/1/20 and ordered to publicly say it wasn’t lab-made, which he did. Fauci then gave… https://t.co/UDzIhNb37k pic.twitter.com/LY7ttS23kJ

— Mises Caucus (@LPMisesCaucus) March 1, 2023

According to Zero Hedge, Andersen is feeling the heat from the latest investigation.

During a sworn deposition, Andersen claimed he also briefed the CIA and FBI, although the timing and specifics of those discussions remain murky.

As the pressure mounts on Andersen, he is reportedly looking to relocate outside the United States, apparently finding a new position at the University of Oslo. This would represent a significant drop in prestige, as the Scripps Research Institute is considered one of the foremost scientific establishments globally.

Despite multiple requests for comment, Andersen has not responded.

The DOJ might want to keep a watchful eye on this individual’s passport for a little while. It seems there’s a growing possibility that Kristian Andersen may have to confront the consequences of his actions after all.

See also  ‘9-1-1: Nashville’ Delivers a Thrilling Country Hunk Spinoff That’s as Absurd as Franchise Fans Will Expect: TV Review

TAGGED:BribedCalledCountryCOVIDDanishDOJFaucifleeinvestigationLabScientistTestifyWuhan
Share This Article
Twitter Email Copy Link Print
Previous Article ‘The Simpsons’ Bosses Reflect on the Shows Enduring Legacy ‘The Simpsons’ Bosses Reflect on the Shows Enduring Legacy
Next Article Cristiano Ronaldo-led Al-Nassr ready to make big-money offer for Italian coach to replace Stefano Pioli: Reports Cristiano Ronaldo-led Al-Nassr ready to make big-money offer for Italian coach to replace Stefano Pioli: Reports
Leave a comment

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Popular Posts

Maison Rabih Kayrouz Fall 2025 Ready-to-Wear Collection

Rabih Kayrouz: A Continuum of Elegance Rabih Kayrouz believes that fashion is not confined to…

April 10, 2025

13 Luxe-Looking Fall Dresses That Slim the Figure — From $20!

Fall is the perfect season to indulge in our favorite comfort foods while still looking…

October 26, 2024

‘Dilbert’ creator Scott Adams reveals President Trump called him after cancer diagnosis

President Trump Reaches Out to Scott Adams After Cancer Diagnosis Scott Adams, the creator of…

May 22, 2025

These Stocks Got a Boost From OpenAI’s DevDay Buzz

OpenAI ChatGPT creator OpenAI has become the world's most valuable private startup Shares of Figma,…

October 8, 2025

May Birthstone: The Color, Symbolism, & Meaning

Emeralds are a stunning gemstone that holds special significance for those born in May. Known…

September 10, 2024

You Might Also Like

The New Scientist Book Club’s verdict on Our Brains, Our Selves: A mix of praise and misgivings
Tech and Science

The New Scientist Book Club’s verdict on Our Brains, Our Selves: A mix of praise and misgivings

October 31, 2025
Democrats plot messaging blitz ahead of Obamacare hikes
Politics

Democrats plot messaging blitz ahead of Obamacare hikes

October 31, 2025
Heritage president backs Tucker Carlson after interview with Holocaust-denier Nick Fuentes
Politics

Heritage president backs Tucker Carlson after interview with Holocaust-denier Nick Fuentes

October 30, 2025
Trump turns up the pressure on Indiana Republicans to redistrict
Politics

Trump turns up the pressure on Indiana Republicans to redistrict

October 30, 2025
logo logo
Facebook Twitter Youtube

About US


Explore global affairs, political insights, and linguistic origins. Stay informed with our comprehensive coverage of world news, politics, and Lifestyle.

Top Categories
  • Crime
  • Environment
  • Sports
  • Tech and Science
Usefull Links
  • Contact
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms & Conditions
  • DMCA

© 2024 americanfocus.online –  All Rights Reserved.

Welcome Back!

Sign in to your account

Lost your password?