PoliticusUSA champions democracy and independent journalism. Support our mission by becoming a subscriber.
Impeachment: A Political Circus Without a Tent
During Donald Trump’s previous tenure as president, he faced impeachment not once, but twice. Each Senate trial saw impeachment managers presenting a robust case, replete with compelling evidence suggesting that the then-president merited removal from officeāor at the very least, disqualification from future office. However, the outcome was never in doubt; a solid wall of Senate Republicans entered each trial with predetermined conclusions, rendering a conviction all but impossible.
Join me on Substack Live at 11 AM ET as I delve into the intricacies of impeachment and address your queries.
The Voterās Verdict: Indifference to Impeachment
In a rather ironic twist, voters re-elected a president who had been impeached twice, signaling a profound indifference toward the very concept of impeachment. This lack of public disdain or consequence for impeachment without conviction sheds light on why Democrats are increasingly reluctant to pursue the same path again.
āWeāve done this. Weāve been through this circus already,ā Donovan McKinney remarked in a recent interview. āHow many times has Trump been impeached? He got reelected. Heās not going anywhere. We need to figure out another strategy to fight back.ā
Impeachment: A Diminishing Return
Itās clear that many elected Democrats acknowledge that Trump deserves impeachment; however, they’ve also grasped a critical reality: impeachment is ineffective when the presidentās party remains steadfastly loyal. House Democratic Conference Chair Pete Aguilar, D-Calif., articulated this sentiment to Semafor, stating, āHeās been impeached twice, but we donāt have any confidence that House and Senate Republicans would do their jobsā and remove Trump. āAnd so, this is not an exercise that weāre willing to undertake.ā
Democrats find themselves in a bind; their base demands action, yet there is a crucial distinction between effective action and merely doing something for the sake of appearances. Impeachment can only be a meaningful endeavor when both parties engage earnestly. If the president’s party refuses to acknowledge evidence, and the opposition lacks the votes to secure a conviction in the Senate, then impeachment becomes an exercise in futility.
Furthermore, without tangible public or political repercussions, impeachment seems little more than a slap on the wrist. Notably, neither Trump nor Bill Clinton faced significant repercussions from their respective impeachments. If the American electorate does not view impeachment as a serious consequence, it devolves into mere political theaterāan act of reprimand lacking substance.
A Search for Real Solutions
In the quest to address the Trump conundrum, some Democrats cling to the notion that impeachment could hold the key to resolution. However, the reality is stark: impeachment is not the answer. The real solution lies in winning back control during the midterm elections, thereby diminishing Trumpās influence, which primarily stems from a Republican Congress that has chosen to abdicate its responsibilities.
Should Democrats reclaim even a portion of Congress, Trump would swiftly become a political lame duck, his legislative ambitions rendered null. As the nation begins to focus on the 2028 election, the current president could find himself facing a dim political future.
Impeachment may not solve the nationās problems, but your vote certainly can.
What are your thoughts on the Democrats’ reluctance to pursue impeachment again? Feel free to leave your comments below.
