It seems that the Democrats have come to a striking realization: the brand of ‘wokeness’ is fast becoming a political pariah, particularly for those eyeing the 2028 presidential race. As whispers of candidacies grow louder, many party members are distancing themselves from the very ideologies that once defined their platform.
The real challenge awaits as the election approaches and the electorate starts to engage. How will the Democratic candidates navigate the minefield of issues like transgender participation in sports or immigration reform without alienating their base? The potential for backlash is palpable.
These politicians find themselves in a precarious position: they’ll face skepticism from conservatives and feelings of betrayal from their progressive supporters. Quite the conundrum, wouldn’t you say?
Politico reports:
The Great Un-Awokening
Ambitious Democrats are currently experiencing what could be described as a slow-motion Sister Souljah moment, seeking a way out of the political wilderness. Potential 2028 candidates, especially those from traditionally blue states, are attempting to pivot back from the leftward tilt on social issues that some believe cost them dearly in the last election.
For instance, Maryland’s Governor Wes Moore recently vetoed a reparations bill, while California’s Governor Gavin Newsom criticized the participation of transgender athletes in female sports as “unfair.” Additionally, Rahm Emanuel has urged fellow Democrats to recalibrate towards the political center.
On issues of diversity, equity, and inclusion, some party members are signaling a departure from their previous stances. Former Transportation Secretary Pete Buttigieg notably removed his pronouns from his social media profiles months ago, expressing concerns over the party’s messaging around these topics.
“Is it about genuinely caring for people’s diverse experiences and ensuring nobody is mistreated because of them, which I will always champion?” he pondered during a forum at the University of Chicago earlier this year. “Or is it about forcing people into training sessions reminiscent of ‘Portlandia,’ which I’ve also endured?”
This entire strategy is poised to collapse under the weight of a few simple questions. For example, how will candidates respond when asked, “What defines a woman?” or “Was Trump correct to prioritize border security?” And let’s not even begin to explore the inevitable inquiries about President Biden’s actions and knowledge during his administration.
