Ā
In an unexpected twist, former President Donald Trump is positioning himself to take credit for ending multiple international conflictsāthis time hinting at yet another āvictoryā in the form of a ceasefire in Gaza. Despite this apparent success, left-wing critics remain undeterred, promptly flooding social media with complaints. One can almost feel their discontent; without wars to bemoan, what else is there left to complain about?
However, it’s important to note that Grok is known for its liberal slant, which may affect its portrayal of Trumpās efforts in a less-than-flattering manner, rather than acknowledging his so-called historical prowess in conflict resolution.
|
Conflict |
Description |
Trumpās Claimed Role |
Current Status & Expert Assessment |
|---|---|---|---|
|
Israel-Iran (12-Day War) |
June 2025: Israel targeted Iranian nuclear facilities, leading to retaliation from Iran. The conflict lasted 12 days and resulted in approximately 500 casualties. |
Trump claimed that U.S. airstrikes prompted a ceasefire and dubbed it an āofficial end.ā |
The ceasefire is holding, yet tensions remain high, evidenced by ongoing proxy attacks. Experts, such as those at the McCain Institute, acknowledge Trump’s role in de-escalation but note that U.S. actions initially heightened tensions.Ā |
|
India-Pakistan (Kashmir Flare-Up) |
May 2025: Cross-border military strikes occurred following the killings of tourists in Kashmir, resulting in around 43 deaths over four days. |
Trump facilitated a āfull ceasefireā through mediated talks and trade negotiations. |
A ceasefire is in place, but the underlying disputes remain unresolved. Pakistan praises Trumpās efforts, while India denies U.S. involvement, crediting its military pressure instead. The Carnegie Endowment attributes some credit for de-escalation to Trump. |
|
DRC-Rwanda (Eastern Congo Conflict) |
This conflict has persisted since the 1990s, with a 2025 escalation involving M23 rebels, backed by Rwanda, resulting in over 140 civilian deaths. |
A peace deal brokered in June with Qatarās assistance aimed to conclude the ā30-year war.ā |
Fighting continues, with both sides accusing each other of violations. According to the UN, ongoing violence is disconnected from peace talks. The International Crisis Group describes the attempts at peace as āpremature.ā |
|
Cambodia-Thailand (Border Skirmish) |
July 2025: Border skirmishes led to five days of clashes, resulting in dozens of deaths and thousands displaced. |
Trump threatened trade sanctions (36% tariffs) to enforce a ceasefire. |
A ceasefire was agreed upon in Malaysia, co-mediated by the U.S. and China. While the ceasefire holds, broader resolution remains elusive, with a University of Michigan analyst remarking that trade conditions were pivotal. |
|
Serbia-Kosovo (Balkan Tensions) |
This simmering conflict dates back to Kosovoās independence in 2008, with heightened rhetoric in 2025 but no active war. |
Trump allegedly helped prevent a ānew warā through economic normalization and tariff threats. |
While no war has occurred, tensions remain high. The U.S. suspended dialogue with Kosovo in September 2025. Experts from the Atlantic Council state that evidence of conflict is lacking. |
|
Egypt-Ethiopia (Nile Dam Dispute) |
Non-military conflict over the Grand Ethiopian Renaissance Dam has spanned 12 years, involving no direct combat. |
Trump attempted to mediate talks with warnings to Egypt about the dam’s potential destruction. |
Discussions are stalled, and no deal has been finalized. Ethiopia has remarked that U.S. comments might incite war. The AP states that there is no actual conflict to be resolved as of yet. |
|
Armenia-Azerbaijan (Nagorno-Karabakh) |
A long-standing conflict erupted again in 2025 following a prior war in 2020. |
Trump issued a joint declaration for peace in August. |
A declaration has been signed, although it does not constitute a final treaty. Fighting has ceased for the moment, but the conflict remains unresolved. The Atlantic Council notes that this declaration does not conclude hostilities. |
|
Israel-Hamas (Gaza War) |
From October 2023 to October 2025, approximately 67,000 Palestinians died following Hamas’s assaults.Ā |
A ceasefire has been negotiated through talks in Egypt, involving U.S. representatives. |
The pact was announced on October 8, 2025, albeit fragile, with hostages and humanitarian aid exchanges in discussion. Axios remarked that it came ātwo years lateā and remains unresolved. |
As we witness this political chess game unfold, one canāt help but anticipate the impending return of discussions about the climate crisis. Just when we thought environmental concerns were sidelined, we’re likely to be bombarded with warnings about fossil fuels and an imminent apocalypse if society doesnāt revert back to medieval living standards.
On October 8, 2025, Israel and Hamas formally agreed to initiate steps to end the two-year conflict in Gaza. The Israeli Cabinet convened the next day to endorse this agreement following extensive negotiations held in Sharm el-Sheikh, Egypt. This deal, a complex 20-point plan, mandates that Hamas release 20 living hostages and 28 deceased ones within 72 hours in exchange for Israelās commitment to release 250 prisoners sentenced to life and approximately 1,700 Gazans who were detained post-October 7, 2023.
The governance of Gaza is set to transition to a technocratic Palestinian committee, overseen by a āBoard of Peaceā led by President Trump, which also includes former British Prime Minister Tony Blair. Hamas members that disarm will be granted amnesty, while options for safe exit will be provided to those wishing to leave. Humanitarian aid is expected to flow into Gaza beginning Monday, with expectations from Trump that hostages will be freed shortly thereafter, with a signing ceremony scheduled in Egypt.
Trumpās peace initiative advocates for a comprehensive ceasefire, the unconditional release of all hostages, large-scale humanitarian assistance, and reconstruction efforts in Gaza aimed at fostering long-term stability.
This plan appears to be generating a surprisingly positive response globally, including from nations typically critical of U.S. foreign policy. A joint statement from foreign ministers representing countries like Qatar, Jordan, the UAE, and Saudi Arabia commended Trump’s leadership, expressing confidence in his peace-making abilities and welcoming his commitment against West Bank annexation.
Leaders from the European Union, UK, Canada, and beyond also issued supportive statements, labeling this initiative as a historic chance to pursue peace and advance a two-state solution. British Prime Minister Keir Starmer characterized the U.S. effort as “profoundly welcome,” while French President Emmanuel Macron expressed optimism in light of Trump’s endeavors. European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen has also expressed support for Trumpās commitment to ending the Gaza conflict.
Notably, praise came from countries like India, Japan, and even China and Turkey, usually critical of the U.S., which viewed Trumpās approach as a constructive effort toward resolving tensions. Turkish President Erdogan acknowledged Trumpās political will, while Israeli President Herzog lauded him as a leader deserving of a Nobel Peace Prize.
The Palestinian Authority also expressed gratitude for Trumpās dedicated efforts and reaffirmed its belief in U.S. leadership for achieving peace.
This negotiation marks what could be considered the seventh conflict Trump has purportedly resolved while in office. Still, one can almost guarantee that critics on the left will find reasons to belittle his achievements. Laughter erupted at his suggestion of a Nobel Prize nomination, despite a number of international leaders backing him for the honor.
In a surprising twist, Maria Corina Machado, the 2025 Nobel Peace Prize laureate, aligned with Trumpās supporters, suggesting he should have been the rightful recipient of the award. It appears the left might now label her as a āTrumptard,ā unable to recognize her previous advocacy for democracy in Venezuela, which she has now linked to Trumpās influence.Ā
Machado declared her Nobel Prize dedication to Trump, recognizing his significant support of Venezuela’s quest for freedom. She emphasized the vital allies neededāTrump and other democratic nationsānecessary for achieving liberty and democracy. This acknowledgment is remarkable, especially as Trump previously campaigned for the Nobel Prize, criticizing the committee for overlooking him.
Even before the Israel-Hamas deal is officially cemented, multiple Muslim-majority nations are signaling interest in joining the Abraham Accords, a significant peace agreement brokered by Trump in 2020 that normalized relationships between Israel and various Arab nations, including the UAE and Bahrain. With this Gaza peace deal generating momentum, the administration is eager to escalate normalization discussions with Saudi Arabia, Indonesia, and other nations, marking a renewed diplomatic initiative since the accords’ inception.
Trump’s tenure underscored a contrast with previous administrations: under Obama, Russia annexed Crimea and the ISIS threat proliferated, while Trump dismantled ISISās might from 2017 to 2019 through decisive military action. Conversely, Biden’s administration is grappling with new crises, including Russia’s aggression in Ukraine and renewed attacks from Hamas in Israel. Throughout this period, Iranian forces have continued to support factions like Hezbollah and Hamas, taking advantage of the geopolitical shifts. Bidenās approach allowed militant groups to attack U.S. and allied interests, while Trump consistently indicated that peace is only achievable through strength.
