In a dramatic turn of events, FBI Director Kash Patel has initiated a sweeping investigation dubbed the “Grand Criminal Conspiracy.” This ambitious probe targets the alleged weaponization of federal agencies over the past decade, cleverly sidestepping the statute of limitations to pursue long-dormant injustices.
A report from JustTheNews reveals that figures from the Obama administration, including Barack Obama himself, John Brennan, James Clapper, and James Comey, are under scrutiny. The investigation suggests a coordinated effort to undermine political opponents, protect Democratic allies, and influence presidential elections spanning from 2016 to 2024.
The plot thickens as jurisdiction may shift to Florida, all thanks to Special Counsel Jack Smith’s controversial raid on Mar-a-Lago.
Previously, hinted that explosive disclosures could emerge in the coming days, potentially revealing the extent to which federal agencies collaborated to skew the political landscape against Donald Trump and mislead the American public.
In a recent interview with Sean Hannity, Solomon articulated that under Kash Patel’s direction, the FBI has formally opened this grand conspiracy investigation. This initiative aims to unearth years of unprecedented misuse of governmental power against President Trump.
Sean Hannity:
According to a groundbreaking report from JustTheNews.com, the FBI is now actively investigating years of federal overreach—kicking off with the infamous Russia collusion narrative and extending all the way to Jack Smith’s actions. The implications for the elections of 2016, 2020, and 2024 are profound.
Sean Hannity:
You’ve penned an extensive investigative piece detailing how the FBI, under Patel’s leadership, has transitioned to this grand conspiracy case focused on weaponization.
We have consistently highlighted FISA abuses and the glaring double standards surrounding classified information. Your report suggests that, from the genesis of the Russia hoax to Jack Smith’s subsequent actions, we are witnessing a pattern of governmental misuse against Donald Trump, indicative of a larger, ongoing conspiracy rife with legal violations.
Furthermore, this investigation circumvents the statute of limitations, implicating figures like Comey, Clapper, and Brennan. Please elaborate.
John Solomon:
Absolutely—Barack Obama was also involved in early meetings. The FBI has systematically organized a timeline of the last decade’s weaponization, incorporating the valuable findings of James Comer’s Oversight Committee.
They’ve identified a repeating cycle: whenever a Democrat faces legal scrutiny—say, Hillary Clinton over her emails or Hunter Biden regarding his taxes—they often evade accountability despite overwhelming evidence. Meanwhile, Republicans like Trump find themselves falsely accused of collusion and other baseless charges.
What we have here is a criminal conspiracy. By framing it as such, the standard five-year statutes for individual crimes are rendered moot. If an event transpired in 2016 and was part of an ongoing conspiracy—which continued with the raid on Trump’s Mar-a-Lago—it can be prosecuted under the broader conspiracy umbrella, rather than as isolated incidents.
Moreover, venue changes become possible.
John Solomon:
Consider the difficulties John Durham encountered when seeking prosecutions in Washington D.C.—jurors were reluctant to convict, even in the face of apparent wrongdoing.
In this case, shifting the grand jury to Florida—where the Mar-a-Lago raid took place—could yield a more impartial jury pool.
This strategy provides Florida Attorney General Pam Bondi with significant leeway to pursue historic accountability for the many issues that Chairmen Comer, Johnson, Grassley, and Jordan have brought to light, thus revealing them to the American populace.
Sean Hannity:
Can you delve deeper into what this might involve—who could be appointed as special counsel, the potential duration of the investigation, and its scope?
We’ve frequently discussed how entrenched bureaucracies have exploited their power, from the 51 intelligence agents oblivious to Hunter’s laptop to the exaggerated claims surrounding Russia. The discrepancies in how Trump, Biden, and Clinton have been treated regarding classified documents are glaring.
There’s a lot to unpack here.
John Solomon:
Indeed, there are several critical points.
First, thanks to the diligent efforts of Chairmen Comer, Jordan, Johnson, and Grassley, much of the evidence is already accessible to the Justice Department, eliminating the need for extensive inquiries.
However, there are two classified pieces of intelligence Trump could potentially declassify, which would significantly accelerate the investigation’s progress.
One involves new classified evidence received by the FBI shortly after Comey cleared Clinton of wrongdoing regarding her emails, which suggested further criminality. This evidence remains buried in a classified annex within the Justice Department’s investigations.
If Trump were to declassify this, it could propel the investigation forward at an unprecedented pace.
The second piece of intelligence indicates that, during the early stages of the Russia collusion investigation, an intelligence intercept revealed that Clinton had approved a scheme to frame Trump with a fabricated scandal. Rather than pursuing this critical evidence, the FBI instead launched an investigation based on the very allegations that were unsubstantiated.
John Solomon:
Should Trump declassify these two key pieces of intelligence, a special prosecutor would have a head start. This inquiry could potentially be wrapped up within a few years.
The appointment of a special counsel isn’t restricted to Justice Department personnel; a Senate-confirmed individual, such as Lee Zeldin, could effectively lead this effort.
Sean Hannity:
Given his legal background, he seems like an excellent candidate.
John Solomon:
He’s not just a lawyer; he’s also a prosecutor, which makes him a strong choice.
