Friday, 31 Oct 2025
  • Contact
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms & Conditions
  • DMCA
logo logo
  • World
  • Politics
  • Crime
  • Economy
  • Tech & Science
  • Sports
  • Entertainment
  • More
    • Education
    • Celebrities
    • Culture and Arts
    • Environment
    • Health and Wellness
    • Lifestyle
  • 🔥
  • Trump
  • VIDEO
  • House
  • White
  • ScienceAlert
  • Trumps
  • Watch
  • man
  • Health
  • Season
Font ResizerAa
American FocusAmerican Focus
Search
  • World
  • Politics
  • Crime
  • Economy
  • Tech & Science
  • Sports
  • Entertainment
  • More
    • Education
    • Celebrities
    • Culture and Arts
    • Environment
    • Health and Wellness
    • Lifestyle
Follow US
© 2024 americanfocus.online – All Rights Reserved.
American Focus > Blog > The White House > Fighting Overcriminalization in Federal Regulations – The White House
The White House

Fighting Overcriminalization in Federal Regulations – The White House

Last updated: May 9, 2025 10:25 pm
Share
Fighting Overcriminalization in Federal Regulations – The White House
SHARE

By the authority vested in me as President by the Constitution and the laws of the United States of America, it is hereby ordered:

Section 1.  Purpose.

The regulatory landscape in the United States has reached a tipping point of absurdity. With the Code of Federal Regulations ballooning to over 48,000 sections and 175,000 pages, it is a Herculean task for any citizen to read, let alone comprehend, the legal labyrinth laid before them. The stakes are high; many regulations could lead to criminal charges for infractions that individuals may not even know exist. Estimates suggest that there could be hundreds of thousands of potential regulatory offenses hidden within this convoluted legal framework. The problem is compounded by the fact that many of these offenses are classified as “strict liability,” meaning that ignorance of the law is no defense—guilt is determined without regard to intent.

This state of affairs is not just ludicrous; it is fundamentally unjust. It grants the executive branch the dual role of lawmaker and enforcer, which opens the door to potential misuse of power. This regulatory quagmire favors large corporations that can afford the luxury of legal expertise, effectively sidelining the average American who may unknowingly stumble into criminality.

The aim of this order is to reduce the regulatory burden on citizens and ensure that no American is ensnared in the web of regulations without a fair chance to understand them.

Sec. 2.  Policy.

It is the policy of the United States that:

  • (a) The criminal enforcement of regulatory offenses is generally discouraged.
  • (b) Prosecutions should primarily target those individuals who are aware, or should reasonably be aware, of the regulations and willfully choose to disregard them, especially if such actions pose significant public risks.
  • (c) Strict liability offenses are “generally disfavored.” United States v. United States Gypsum, Co., 438 U.S. 422, 438 (1978). Where enforcement is necessary, agencies are encouraged to pursue civil rather than criminal actions, or administrative enforcement where due process and the right to a jury trial permit.
  • (d) Agencies that create regulations subject to criminal enforcement must clearly delineate the behaviors that could lead to such penalties, including the relevant statutes and the mental state required for conviction.

Sec. 3.  Definitions.

For the purposes of this order:

  • (a) “Agency” refers to what is defined as an “Executive agency” in section 105 of title 5, United States Code;
  • (b) “Criminal regulatory offense” denotes a federal regulation that carries a criminal penalty;
  • (c) “Mens rea” indicates the mental state that must be established to convict someone of a crime.

Sec. 4.  Report on Criminal Regulatory Offenses.

(a) Within one year of this order, agency heads, in consultation with the Attorney General, must submit to the Director of the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) a report that includes:

  • (i) A comprehensive list of all criminal regulatory offenses enforceable by the agency or the Department of Justice;
  • (ii) An outline of potential penalties for each offense and the applicable mens rea standards.

(b) In tandem with the above report, each agency must publicly post this information on its website.

(c) Agency heads are required to update this report regularly, at least once a year.

(d) Criminal enforcement of any regulatory offense not included in the report is strongly discouraged. When considering referrals to the Department of Justice or internal investigations, agency heads should take into account whether the offense is listed in their public report, and the Attorney General should similarly weigh this before pursuing any criminal actions.

Sec. 5.  Promoting Regulatory Transparency.

(a) Following the issuance of this order, all future notices of proposed rulemaking (NPRMs) and final rules published in the Federal Register that might lead to criminal regulatory offenses should explicitly indicate that they are subject to criminal penalties and cite the relevant authorizing statute. Agencies are encouraged to draft these statements in collaboration with the Department of Justice.

(b) The regulatory text in all NPRMs and final rules with potential criminal consequences published thereafter should clearly outline the mens rea requirement for each offense, backed by references to the applicable statutes.

(c) Strict liability offenses in criminal regulations are discouraged. Any proposed or finalized regulatory offense that imposes strict liability will be regarded as a “significant regulatory action” and should be submitted for review to the Administrator of the Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs under Executive Order 12866 of September 30, 1993 (Regulatory Planning and Review), or any subsequent process.

Sec. 6.  Default Mens Rea for Criminal Regulatory Offenses.

(a) Each agency head, in consultation with the Attorney General, will review their statutory authorities to determine if a universal mens rea standard can be established for criminal regulatory offenses, which would apply unless stated otherwise in specific regulations.

(b) Within 30 days following the report mentioned in section 4(a), agency heads must submit to the Director of OMB a summary of their findings and assess whether the mens rea standards are suitable. If appropriate, they should propose changes to adopt a general mens rea standard, justifying any deviations from this standard for specific offenses.

Sec. 7.  Agency Referrals for Potential Criminal Enforcement.

Within 45 days of this order, agencies must publish guidance in the Federal Register detailing their approach to addressing criminally liable regulatory offenses. This guidance should clarify that when deciding whether to refer alleged violations to the Department of Justice, agencies must consider various factors, including:

  • (a) The actual or potential harm caused by the alleged offense;
  • (b) The potential benefits the alleged offender might gain from the violation;
  • (c) Whether the offender possessed any specialized knowledge or licensing relevant to the regulation;
  • (d) Any evidence regarding the offender’s awareness of the unlawfulness of their actions and their knowledge of the regulation in question.

Sec. 8.  Effect on Immigration Enforcement and National Security Functions.

This order does not impact the enforcement of immigration laws or regulations connected to national security or defense.

Sec. 9.  General Provisions.

(a) This order should not be interpreted as diminishing the authority granted to any executive department or agency, or its head;

(b) This order will be implemented in line with applicable laws and contingent on available appropriations.

(c) This order is not intended to confer any rights or benefits that may be enforceable by any party against the United States or its entities, officers, employees, or agents.

DONALD J. TRUMP

    May 9, 2025.

See also  President Donald J. Trump Strengthens Probationary Periods to Improve the Federal Service – The White House
TAGGED:FederalfightingHouseOvercriminalizationRegulationsWhite
Share This Article
Twitter Email Copy Link Print
Previous Article JS Mobility: Tesla denied ‘Robotaxi’ trademark, Aurora loses a co-founder, and tariffs start to take a toll JS Mobility: Tesla denied ‘Robotaxi’ trademark, Aurora loses a co-founder, and tariffs start to take a toll
Next Article A Bronze Tribute to Motherhood Rises in Prospect Park A Bronze Tribute to Motherhood Rises in Prospect Park
Leave a comment

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Popular Posts

Four major threats to vaccine access in the U.S., experts warn

The politicization of vaccines has become a growing concern for public health experts, including former…

June 20, 2025

Inside HGTV’s Financial Struggles, Viewership Loss Before Cancellations

HGTV has been facing financial challenges behind the scenes, leading to the decision to pull…

July 30, 2025

The 30-year fight over how many numbers we need to describe reality

Phoebe Watts/NASA The discussion had its genesis one summer day in 1992 at CERN's cafeteria…

October 15, 2025

Treasury Secretary says individual investors trust President Trump

Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent recently highlighted the confidence that individual investors have in President Donald…

April 29, 2025

Man Accused Of Boulder Terror Attack Charged With Federal Hate Crime

A man named Mohammed Sabry Soliman has been charged with a federal hate crime for…

June 3, 2025

You Might Also Like

House of horrors stepmom Kimberly Sullivan wants stepson’s identity revealed — which his biological mom slams as ‘appalling’
World News

House of horrors stepmom Kimberly Sullivan wants stepson’s identity revealed — which his biological mom slams as ‘appalling’

October 31, 2025
Trump greets hundreds of trick-or-treaters at White House Halloween
World News

Trump greets hundreds of trick-or-treaters at White House Halloween

October 30, 2025
President Donald J. Trump Strengthens Probationary Periods to Improve the Federal Service – The White House
The White House

The Republic of Korea Joins First Lady Melania Trump’s Fostering the Future Together – The White House

October 30, 2025
Federal Reserve Cuts Key Rate Yet Powell Says Future Reductions Are Not Locked In
World News

Federal Reserve Cuts Key Rate Yet Powell Says Future Reductions Are Not Locked In

October 30, 2025
logo logo
Facebook Twitter Youtube

About US


Explore global affairs, political insights, and linguistic origins. Stay informed with our comprehensive coverage of world news, politics, and Lifestyle.

Top Categories
  • Crime
  • Environment
  • Sports
  • Tech and Science
Usefull Links
  • Contact
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms & Conditions
  • DMCA

© 2024 americanfocus.online –  All Rights Reserved.

Welcome Back!

Sign in to your account

Lost your password?