Friday, 10 Oct 2025
  • Contact
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms & Conditions
  • DMCA
logo logo
  • World
  • Politics
  • Crime
  • Economy
  • Tech & Science
  • Sports
  • Entertainment
  • More
    • Education
    • Celebrities
    • Culture and Arts
    • Environment
    • Health and Wellness
    • Lifestyle
  • 🔥
  • Trump
  • VIDEO
  • House
  • White
  • ScienceAlert
  • Trumps
  • Watch
  • man
  • Health
  • Season
Font ResizerAa
American FocusAmerican Focus
Search
  • World
  • Politics
  • Crime
  • Economy
  • Tech & Science
  • Sports
  • Entertainment
  • More
    • Education
    • Celebrities
    • Culture and Arts
    • Environment
    • Health and Wellness
    • Lifestyle
Follow US
© 2024 americanfocus.online – All Rights Reserved.
American Focus > Blog > Economy > Health Care Markets Fail So Government Must Intervene? Kenneth Arrow Said No Such Thing
Economy

Health Care Markets Fail So Government Must Intervene? Kenneth Arrow Said No Such Thing

Last updated: April 22, 2025 5:50 am
Share
Health Care Markets Fail So Government Must Intervene? Kenneth Arrow Said No Such Thing
SHARE

We’ve all been subjected to the familiar mantra, the sort of incantation that echoes through the halls of policy debates: Kenneth Arrow demonstrated that markets fail in health care, necessitating government intervention. This phrase has become something of a talisman for advocates on all sides of the health care reform debate.

What follows this incantation varies wildly. Perhaps you’ll hear a case for regulating nurse practitioners, or a defense of physicians dispensing medications, or even an outright call for price controls on pharmaceuticals. Some will advocate for the complete abolition of profit, private health insurance, and, while we’re at it, human nature itself, all in pursuit of a utopian vision of Medicare for All. To many, it seems that health care is a realm where market failures are omnipresent, and government solutions are the holy grail.

However, one must pause to consider: Kenneth Arrow never actually claimed that government intervention is the panacea for all health care woes.

In 1972, Arrow was awarded the Nobel Prize in Economics for his groundbreaking contributions to economic equilibrium theory and welfare economics, which also included the rather unflattering observation that democracy has its shortcomings.

Nine years prior, the American Economic Review published Arrow’s pivotal paper, “Uncertainty and the Welfare Economics of Medical Care.” Although the Nobel committee chose not to highlight this article, Berkeley health economist James C. Robinson noted that Arrow’s 1963 essay is “a good article by a great economist,” and a significant application of risk theory in health economics, which could pave the way for future advancements.

See also  Christine Lagarde discussed leaving ECB early to head WEF, Klaus Schwab says

Indeed, Arrow’s 1963 work remains foundational in health economics, primarily due to its assertion that various market failures impede health care markets from achieving efficiency. As Robinson aptly summarized, the crux of Arrow’s argument is the imperfect and asymmetrical distribution of health care information. Such discrepancies from the ideal of perfect competition often leave consumers and producers unable to make socially optimal choices—or even rationally choose against making them. Arrow observed that both government and market actors frequently attempt to address these issues through various means, including ethical standards.

This is precisely why Arrow’s insights have been appropriated more broadly than perhaps warranted. The health sector is rife with interest groups eager to extract special privileges from the government. What better way to bolster one’s argument than to invoke a Nobel laureate who theorized that health care markets cannot deliver optimal outcomes? Robinson explains that Arrow’s work has been used to justify a plethora of inefficiencies and claims within the health care industry:

[Arrow’s] article…has been seized upon to justify every inefficiency, idiosyncrasy, and interest-serving institution in the health care industry…It has served to lend the author’s unparalleled reputation to subsequent claims that advertising, optometry, and midwifery are threats to consumer well-being, that nonprofit ownership is natural for hospitals though not for physician practices, that price competition undermines product quality, that antitrust exemptions reduce costs, that consumers cannot compare insurance plans and must yield this function to politicians, that price regulation is effective for pharmaceutical products despite having failed in other applications, that cost-conscious choice is unethical while cost-unconscious choice is a basic human right, that what consumers want is not what they need, and, more generally, that the real is reasonable, the facts are functional, and the health care sector is constrained Pareto-efficient.

See also  PetMeds And Dutch Team Up For Veterinary Care And Prescriptions

It would probably astonish the average health economist to learn that Arrow also suggested that government intervention can exacerbate issues; that numerous problems existing in 1963 stemmed from nonmarket interventions; that the government should not restrict medical school admissions or subsidize medical education; that government actions can make health care less accessible by inflating prices; that insurance encourages price inflation; that maximizing health insurance benefits requires “maximum possible discrimination of risks”; and that preexisting conditions are uninsurable, rendering attempts to cover them “probably pointless.” Ideologues and rent-seeking factions tend to quote Arrow more than they engage with his work, read it more than they comprehend it, and distort it more than they genuinely appreciate it.

Furthermore, it might surprise them to know that Arrow wasn’t particularly engrossed in the sector his research so profoundly influenced. By 1999, the health sector had eclipsed all other sectors in terms of congressional lobbying expenditures, a position it has maintained ever since. Such financial clout allows the industry to shape the regulations, tax policies, and subsidies that Arrow’s work helped to stimulate. In 2016, while advocating for a Canadian-style health system in the U.S., Arrow shrugged, stating, “Of course, [Nobel Prize-winning economist] George Stigler would say that there could be regulatory capture, but so far it doesn’t seem to have happened really.”

When the theoretical and the practical collide, what is a social scientist to do?

Click here to read Arrow in his own words. For a deeper dive into how Arrow’s 1963 work diverges from the interpretations of ideologues and special interest groups, check out Kenneth Arrow’s 1963 Article on Health Care Doesn’t Say What You Think.

See also  Preterm infant care faces crisis from baby formula liability suits

 


Michael F. Cannon (MA, JM) is the director of health policy studies at the Cato Institute.

TAGGED:ArrowcareFailGovernmentHealthInterveneKennethMarkets
Share This Article
Twitter Email Copy Link Print
Previous Article Vance’s trolling audition to be Trump’s heir Vance’s trolling audition to be Trump’s heir
Next Article Vatican Releases Images of The Late Pope Francis in Open Coffin Vatican Releases Images of The Late Pope Francis in Open Coffin
Leave a comment

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Popular Posts

Meghan Markle Accused Of Stealing The Spotlight From Kate Middleton

Kate Middleton Shares Cancer Update on Social Media On Monday, September 9, Kate Middleton took…

September 11, 2024

If Your Work/Life Balance is Out of Tune Here’s What to Do

Finding a healthy work-life balance is essential for overall well-being and productivity. It's easy to…

September 16, 2024

How to Decorate a Mantel in 5 Easy Steps, According to Design Pros

From vintage sterling silver boxes to hand-glazed ceramic candle holders, these personal touches add character…

April 16, 2025

The 17-year-old rodeo star | Star News

Zoe Johnston’s passion for horse riding began at the tender age of three, thanks to…

June 10, 2025

3 New Hulu Movies With at Least 90 Percent on Rotten Tomatoes (October 2025)

Choosing a movie to stream can be a daunting task—there are countless incredible films out…

October 9, 2025

You Might Also Like

Gold, Silver, and U.S. Stocks Are All at Record Highs. What Gives?
Economy

Gold, Silver, and U.S. Stocks Are All at Record Highs. What Gives?

October 10, 2025
Speaker Mike Johnson Reveals Democrats Plan to Keep Government Closed Until AFTER “No Kings” Protest in DC – “I Have Had it With These People… They Can’t Face Their Rabid Base” (VIDEO) | The Gateway Pundit | by Jordan Conradson
Politics

Speaker Mike Johnson Reveals Democrats Plan to Keep Government Closed Until AFTER “No Kings” Protest in DC – “I Have Had it With These People… They Can’t Face Their Rabid Base” (VIDEO) | The Gateway Pundit | by Jordan Conradson

October 10, 2025
Meme stock resurgence prompts return of central meme investment fund
Economy

Meme stock resurgence prompts return of central meme investment fund

October 10, 2025
Sugar Prices Retreat on a Forecast for a Global Sugar Surplus
Economy

Sugar Prices Retreat on a Forecast for a Global Sugar Surplus

October 10, 2025
logo logo
Facebook Twitter Youtube

About US


Explore global affairs, political insights, and linguistic origins. Stay informed with our comprehensive coverage of world news, politics, and Lifestyle.

Top Categories
  • Crime
  • Environment
  • Sports
  • Tech and Science
Usefull Links
  • Contact
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms & Conditions
  • DMCA

© 2024 americanfocus.online –  All Rights Reserved.

Welcome Back!

Sign in to your account

Lost your password?