The Universal School Meals Program Act of 2022, introduced by Sen. Bernie Sanders and Rep. Ilhan Omar, would provide free breakfast, lunch, and dinner to all students in public and nonprofit private schools. The bill has the backing of nearly 100 Democratic co-sponsors in the House and Senate.
If Democrats maintain control of Congress and win the White House in the 2024 election, the bill could become law, making free school meals a reality for millions of students across the country.
“This is not a radical idea,” Sanders said in a statement. “It is common sense. No child in this country should go hungry while they are in school. It is a moral imperative that we provide all students with the nutrition they need to learn, grow, and thrive.”
But the future of free school meals could be in jeopardy if Republicans take control of Congress or the White House. GOP leaders have been vocal about their opposition to universal free school meals, arguing that the cost is too high and that the program should be limited to students from low-income families.
“We cannot afford to provide free meals to every student in this country,” said House Minority Leader Kevin McCarthy. “We need to focus our resources on those who need it most, not on universal handouts that will only increase government spending and dependency.”
As the 2024 election approaches, the debate over free school meals is likely to intensify. Advocates for the policy are hopeful that the momentum created by the COVID-19 pandemic will push lawmakers to act in the best interest of students and their families.
“We have seen the benefits of free school meals firsthand, and we cannot go back to the old way of doing things,” said Bylander. “It is time for our leaders to step up and ensure that every child has access to the nutrition they need to succeed in school and in life.”
The Universal Meals Program Act of 2023, introduced by Sen. Bernie Sanders and Rep. Ilhan Omar, aimed to provide all students with free breakfast and lunch at school. While the bill has garnered support from many Democrats in Congress, it has yet to gain any Republican backing. The chances of such a policy passing seem more promising under a Harris administration than a Trump administration, as evidenced by the lack of support from the GOP.
For the policy to be implemented, Democrats would need to have control of both chambers of Congress or include it in a larger budget package. This federal policy would allow states that already offer free meals to claim additional federal funding, reducing their reliance on state resources.
The Trump administration has not expressed much interest in school meals, and past Republican efforts to eliminate or reduce the community eligibility provision suggest that a free meals policy would face significant obstacles under a second Trump term. Advocates like Bylander argue that eliminating this provision would have a devastating impact on children who rely on school meals for their daily nutrition.
Instead of scaling back existing programs, Bylander and others advocate for expanding the community eligibility provision to cover entire states, ensuring that all students have access to free meals regardless of their family income. The attention brought to this issue during the election season has generated momentum and support at all levels of government.
Sabella, another advocate for free school meals, is hopeful that this momentum will lead to positive changes in the future. She emphasizes the importance of providing children with the nutrition they need to thrive. With the ongoing discussions and support for free school meals, there is optimism that progress can be made in ensuring all students have access to nutritious meals at school.