Unlock the Editor’s Digest for free
Roula Khalaf, Editor of the FT, selects her favourite stories in this weekly newsletter.
Goldman Sachs’ Potential Losses Drop Significantly in Fed Stress Test
Goldman Sachs saw a drastic reduction in potential losses in an economic shock scenario under the Federal Reserve’s stress test this year. The bank stood to lose just $300 million, a stark contrast to the $18 billion forecasted the previous year. This dramatic decrease played a significant role in the bank’s ability to provide shareholders with substantial payouts.
The decline in estimated losses can be attributed to Goldman’s efforts in recent years to minimize risk-taking, resulting in the need to allocate more capital to mitigate volatility. Additionally, technical changes to the Fed’s stress test made it more favorable for Wall Street’s major banks, leading to a wave of dividend increases and share buybacks for investors.
While several banks benefited from the easier test criteria, Goldman emerged as the clear winner. The bank announced a 33% increase in its dividend to $4 per share, citing the lower estimated losses as a key factor in reducing its capital requirement to 10.9% of assets, the lowest level since the current Fed regime was implemented in 2020.
The Fed’s stress test this year simulated a scenario where the economy declined by 7.8% in a year, with unemployment reaching 10%, and significant drops in home and commercial property prices. The exclusion of private equity investments from the market shock scenario proved particularly beneficial for Goldman, given its direct exposure in this area compared to its peers.
The Fed also adjusted its models to place greater emphasis on gains and losses from market hedging. Improved results in trading loss scenarios were attributed to atypical client behavior, such as pre-election trading, and changes in how hedges are assessed and valued.
Despite the positive outcome for Goldman, the projected trading losses were still considerably lower than those of other banks. Morgan Stanley and JPMorgan, for example, faced $7 billion and $10.2 billion in losses, respectively. The lack of transparency in the Fed’s calculation models has long been a source of frustration for US banks, with calls for more clarity and consistency in the stress test process.
Goldman Sachs’ ability to significantly reduce its capital requirement provides the bank with greater flexibility in funding its operations and returning capital to shareholders. CEO David Solomon emphasized the bank’s focus on reducing capital intensity and strengthening its business resilience in response to the stress test results.
Overall, the Fed’s stress tests serve as a crucial regulatory tool to ensure banks maintain adequate capital levels to withstand market shocks. Goldman’s success in navigating the latest test underscores its commitment to risk management and financial stability in a challenging economic environment.
