Unlock the White House Watch newsletter for free
Your guide to what Trump’s second term means for Washington, business, and the world
Intel Faces Shareholder Lawsuit Over Alleged Deal with US Government
A recent shareholder lawsuit has brought Intel’s leadership under scrutiny for allegedly granting a 10 percent stake to the US government out of fear of personal attacks from the Trump administration. The lawsuit, filed in the Delaware Court of Chancery by individual shareholder Richard Paisner, describes the August 2025 transaction as an “unlawful contract” that gave the government $11 billion worth of Intel stock without meaningful consideration.
The lawsuit highlights the unprecedented efforts of the Trump administration to involve the federal government in private enterprises deemed critical to national interests. It claims that Intel’s CEO and board members were influenced by the threat of attacks from President Trump and his supporters, leading them to prioritize personal reputation over shareholder interests.
In August 2025, Trump’s criticism of Intel’s CEO Lip-Bu Tan, citing conflicts of interest, prompted a hasty visit to the White House where Trump later withdrew his comments. Shortly after, it was announced that the US government would acquire a 10 percent stake in Intel, funded by grants under the Biden-era Chips Act and federal grants.
The lawsuit alleges that the deal was made to secure Tan’s position as CEO, rather than acting in the best interest of shareholders. It also calls out Intel’s legal representation, Skadden, for allegedly having conflicts of interest by simultaneously representing the Department of Commerce in a similar deal.
The lawsuit names the US Department of Commerce, Secretary Howard Lutnick, and former Intel board chair Frank Yeary as defendants. Since the deal, Intel’s market capitalization has nearly doubled, reflecting investor confidence in the company’s future under Tan’s leadership.
Tan took over as Intel’s CEO in March 2025 following the abrupt removal of his predecessor, Pat Gelsinger, amid mounting losses in the foundry business. While some analysts anticipated a shift in strategy under Tan’s leadership, he has maintained a focus on advancing chip manufacturing in the US.
Intel has declined to comment on the lawsuit, while the Commerce Department and Skadden have not responded to requests for comment. As the case unfolds, the implications of government intervention in private enterprise and the responsibilities of corporate leadership are brought into question.
Stay tuned for updates on this developing story and subscribe to the White House Watch newsletter for in-depth analysis of the intersection between politics, business, and global affairs.
Additional reporting by Aime Williams
