The controversy surrounding documentary photographer Shirin Abedi’s statement of “Free Palestine” at the German Photographic Society’s (DGPh) award ceremony has sparked a heated debate within the photography community. The incident, which took place during the organization’s annual gala where Abedi received a special mention under the Otto Steinert Prize, has divided opinions among members of the DGPh.

Founded in 1951 as a response to the destruction of Germany’s photography industry after World War II, the DGPh has a long history of honoring individuals and groups who have made significant contributions to the field of photography. With over 1,100 members who are invited to join the organization, the DGPh aims to be an open forum for all those interested in photography.

During her acceptance speech, Abedi made a passionate plea for the liberation of Palestine, citing the ongoing violence and oppression faced by the Palestinian people at the hands of the Israeli government. Her statement, which also touched on issues of colonialism and genocide, has drawn both praise and criticism from the photography community.

Following the ceremony, Thomas Gerwers, the chairman of DGPh’s Art, Market, and Law Section, sent Abedi a letter asking for an apology and accusing her of engaging in political propaganda. Gerwers expressed his disappointment with Abedi’s remarks, stating that the DGPh aims to be a platform for all individuals interested in photography, including Israelis.

The incident has highlighted the growing tensions within the German cultural institutions regarding voices critical of Israeli policies towards Palestinians. In recent years, there has been a crackdown on artists and activists who speak out against Israeli violence, leading to protests and cultural boycotts in Germany.

Ahmed Zidan, from the Freedom of the Press Foundation, has criticized Gerwers’s letter as emblematic of the stifling of pro-Palestine voices within German cultural institutions. Zidan argues that Abedi’s work, which focuses on colonialism and historical injustices, is being undermined by the very institution that awarded her for it.

In response to the backlash, Abedi has defended her statement, citing her concerns about human rights violations and the need for open dialogue within the photography industry. She believes that it is essential for photographers and visual storytellers to engage in discussions about social issues and injustices.

The controversy surrounding Abedi’s speech at the DGPh award ceremony serves as a reminder of the power of art and photography to provoke important conversations about social justice and human rights. As the debate continues within the photography community, it is clear that these issues are not just limited to the images we capture but also the words we speak.