The Senate Energy and Natural Resources Committee recently approved bipartisan energy permitting legislation sponsored by Chair Joe Manchin (I-WV) and Ranking Member John Barrasso (R-WY). The legislation aims to speed up transmission buildout for renewable energy while also including provisions that benefit fossil fuel and mining companies. However, there are concerns that the bill may have negative impacts on public lands, frontline communities, and fail to adequately address the climate crisis.
The bill includes important provisions related to energy transmission, such as requiring FERC to establish a process for cost allocation for transmission projects spanning multiple planning regions. This is crucial for the clean energy transition and improving the reliability of the electric grid. The bill also streamlines FERC’s authority to permit interstate transmission projects that are in the public interest, helping to modernize the grid and promote renewable energy.
Despite these positive aspects, there are several problematic provisions in the bill. For example, it shortens the time allowed to file a court challenge to an energy permitting decision, potentially limiting accountability. Additionally, the bill includes provisions that would expand drilling on public lands, increase mining companies’ access to public lands for toxic waste storage, and override careful planning for offshore drilling.
Furthermore, the bill includes a provision that would expedite approvals for LNG exports, potentially harming communities and the environment. It also mandates broad categorical exclusions for energy-related permitting decisions under NEPA, undermining the law’s intent to consider environmental impacts and public input.
While the bill has gained momentum, there are concerns about its overall impact on environmental justice and the transition to clean energy. Smarter legislative proposals, such as the Clean Electricity and Transmission Acceleration Act, Public Lands Renewable Energy Development Act, and the Environmental Justice for All Act, could achieve similar goals without the harmful provisions included in the Manchin/Barrasso bill.
In conclusion, while the bill aims to facilitate energy transmission, there are significant concerns about its potential negative impacts on the environment and communities. It is essential to prioritize a just and equitable transition to clean energy, rather than reverting to outdated approaches that prioritize fossil fuels.
