Paris Jackson has intensified her criticisms aimed at the two individuals managing her late father Michael Jackson’s estate, likening them to the “Wizard of Oz” in her ongoing battle over financial matters, as reported exclusively by Us Weekly. The estate executors countered by stating they have expended more than $65 million to support Paris.
On Friday, October 3, Paris, aged 27, filed legal documents opposing the executors’ petition for approval of fees for external law firms.
Her attorney asserted, “The executors acknowledge that they made six-figure extra-contractual payments in 2018, and they potentially disbursed millions more in undisclosed gifts over the last seven years.”
“This behavior, stemming from their self-assurance and entitlement, is unacceptable, yet the Executors have not shown any indication to the contrary,” her lawyer continued. “Instead, much like the Wizard of Oz, they insist that the Court place blind trust in them, refusing to permit scrutiny of their actions.”
The filing further noted, “The only justification the Executors have provided to rationalize these payments is a vague claim that sending gratuities to musical attorneys is ‘not unusual.’”
Her lawyer argued that the executors have made “no effort to substantiate this self-serving claim, provided no justification for the amounts disbursed, and have neglected to address payments for supposedly unbilled work.” Paris asserted that the executors lacked the authority to oppose her petition, especially since her evidence was derived from the executors’ own court submissions.
Paris Jackson Peter White/Getty Images
In her legal motion, she asserted her right to question the case. “It should be clear that Executors are not shielded from accountability in light of misconduct revealed in their filings,” her lawyer pointed out. She accused the executors of filing a recent motion intended to delay the discovery phase where she could request specific documents and information.
Paris stated that the executors lacked the authority to grant the “extra-contractual gifts” and did not properly assess the 2018 gifts based on any criteria, and initially failed to disclose the gifts in their filings. Her attorney remarked, “This situation presents significant issues even if the extra-contractual payments could hypothetically be justified, which they cannot.”
She maintained that her inquiries are legitimate and requested the immediate dismissal of the executors’ attempt to halt her petition.
In their response, the estate stated they have allocated over $65 million for Paris’s expenses.
On Thursday, October 9, the estate executors, John Branca and John McClain, disclosed the benefits Paris has received since her father’s passing in 2009 at age 50.
“Few individuals have profited more from the Executors’ decisions than [Paris], who has received approximately $65 million in benefits from the Estate. She would not have received that amount had the executors adhered to a standard approach for an estate of this nature back in July 2009.”
As Us previously reported, Paris expressed that she has significant concerns regarding the requested amounts, claiming these figures varied across different invoices for work rendered in 2018. She also alleged the executors authorized excessively large bonuses to law firms, which she believes should not be permitted. The executors, who consistently submit accounting reports to the court, requested a judge to halt Paris’s actions, asserting their expenses were justified and essential for the estate’s operations.
In their submission, the executors contended that Paris’s claim regarding the payment of approximately $600,000 in bonuses (which would be refunded if not approved) during a year when the Estate accrued nearly $300 million is not a credible reason to greatly hinder the Executors’ capacity to manage the Estate’s business operations.
An attorney for the executors remarked, “The Executors welcome scrutiny of their actions. They always have. And why wouldn’t they? The Court has stated that the executors’ business acumen has transformed an estate that initially had ‘nothing but debt and substantial ongoing obligations’ into a $2 billion asset—an estate now recognized as a formidable entity in the music industry.”
A judicial ruling is still pending.
As previously covered by Us, Paris criticized the executors in documents submitted in August. “As disheartening as it is to articulate publicly, the current records imply a collective of close-knit, well-compensated attorneys is taking advantage of the executors’ lack of oversight to siphon funds from the Estate, quite openly,” Paris’s lawyer claimed.
In another filing, Paris’s legal team stated, “These unusual payments pose serious and substantial concerns regarding the Executors’ capability to effectively supervise legal counsel, particularly by refraining from extravagant, six-figure gifts to themselves and their associates.”
The executors have dismissed Paris’s assertions.
A lawyer representing the estate, Jonathan Steinsapir, previously stated to Us, “The remarkable turnaround and accomplishments of Michael Jackson’s estate for the benefit of his children speak volumes. The business decisions of the Estate’s executors have generated billions for Michael’s heirs, who have utilized that same judgment to secure fair payment for a top-tier legal team that has aided them in achieving these outstanding results, all while countering unfounded accusations against Michael from opportunists looking to profit at the estate’s expense.”
The estate’s attorney added, “The allegations put forth by this new team of attorneys for Paris—who lack significant experience in the entertainment sector—are baseless and slanderous.”
“We are confident that the Court will dismiss these claims and once more affirm the estate’s records, as has occurred multiple times over the past sixteen years,” concluded Steinsapir.
Branca and McClain have served as Michael’s estate executors since the iconic performer’s death in 2009 at the age of 50. Paris, along with her brothers Prince Jackson and Bigi Jackson, are the beneficiaries of Michael’s estate, which also provides for their grandmother, Katherine Jackson, in accordance with his wishes.
