Democrats Take Action Amid Kimmel Controversy, But Strategy Remains Elusive
In a surprising twist, Democrats initiated investigations, requested subpoenas, and called for the resignation of the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) chair on Thursday, following the suspension of late-night comedian Jimmy Kimmel. This rapid response showcased a party eager to assert itself, yet struggling to gain a coherent stance in a politically fragmented environment.
The challenge lies in translating this newfound unity into a viable electoral strategy. With pivotal midterm elections on the horizon, Democrats find themselves divided over the messaging surrounding threats to democracy. This internal conflict was apparent in their responses to Kimmel’s suspension, as some members advocated for a recalibration of communication tactics.
During a press conference on Capitol Hill aimed at unveiling legislation designed to safeguard free speech, Senator Chris Murphy (D-Conn.) criticized former President Donald Trump for allegedly “attempting to dismantle our democracy” and likened him to “self-proclaimed autocrats.” In contrast, Rep. Maxwell Frost (D-Fla.) issued a stark warning, asserting, “fascism is not just coming; it is already here.” Meanwhile, Michigan state Senator Mallory McMorrow, gearing up for a high-profile Senate primary, cautioned that such language might be “too abstract for the average voter,” urging her colleagues to simplify their messaging to resonate with everyday concerns.
“What we observed in 2024 was a disconnect: when we discuss ‘fascism’ or ‘democracy’ in grand terms, it becomes overwhelming,” McMorrow remarked. “People often feel paralyzed, asking themselves, ‘What can I do about this?’” A Democratic House member, speaking on condition of anonymity, echoed her sentiments, emphasizing the importance of framing. “Saying, ‘they’re stripping away your speech and silencing you’ carries more weight than a vague statement about ‘democracy being at risk,’” he added.
The Kimmel incident, particularly in the context of the already charged political climate following the assassination of conservative activist Charlie Kirk, has sparked intense debate. Kimmel’s comments, which seemingly aligned the alleged perpetrator with the MAGA movement, prompted ABC to suspend him after FCC Chair Brendan Carr threatened repercussions against the network, stating, “we can take this the easy way or the hard way.”
“This is clearly part of a broader attack on free speech,” former Transportation Secretary Pete Buttigieg told POLITICO. “If the voices of comedians, academics, and journalists are stifled, we are no longer a free society.”
House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries joined the fray, releasing a statement condemning the FCC’s actions as a “corrupt abuse of power.” However, veteran Democratic strategist David Axelrod cautioned against losing sight of the main issues. “We must remember that the primary focus should be the economic struggles people face in their daily lives,” he stated. “That said, we cannot ignore the implications of this free speech crisis.”
Trump, for his part, celebrated Kimmel’s suspension during a press conference in the UK, attributing it to the comedian’s poor ratings rather than any political maneuvering. “He made a terrible remark about a respected individual like Charlie Kirk,” Trump stated. “You can call it free speech if you want, but he was let go due to a lack of talent.”
Even among those sympathetic to Trump, some comedians and podcasters have expressed concerns regarding Kimmel’s suspension. Tim Dillon, who previously interviewed Trump ally JD Vance, remarked on Instagram, “I oppose Kimmel’s removal and the violence against individuals for their opinions. See how simple it is?” One host of the Flagrant podcast, who engaged with Trump in 2024, stated, “Honestly, the attack on free speech has never been this pronounced.”
Democrats perceive this situation as a potential opportunity to connect with moderate voters. Tim Hogan, a senior adviser for the Democratic National Committee, noted, “Many individuals are drifting away from Trump’s coalition and recognize that anyone could be a target for their words. This isn’t just an abstract concept; it’s a direct assault on your right to free expression.”
North Carolina state Senator Graig Meyer urged his party to approach this narrative creatively, suggesting they frame it as “Republicans wanting to take away your laughter.” He emphasized, “The left often struggles with culturally embedded storytelling, while Republicans excel at it. This is a chance to reshape the narrative surrounding Trump and show that Democrats are willing to fight back.”
The whirlwind of events challenges a party still navigating the aftermath of the last presidential election, where leaning on democracy as a campaign theme failed to yield results. In 2024, despite framing their message against Trump, Democrats lost the popular vote. Vice President Kamala Harris held one of her final campaign rallies at the same location where Trump had rallied his supporters prior to the Capitol insurrection.
Several national Democrats privately acknowledged that issues surrounding Kimmel and free speech are unlikely to dominate midterm discussions. “Polls consistently show that threats to democracy rank low among swing voters’ priorities,” one strategist shared under the condition of anonymity. “I doubt this will feature prominently in television ads next fall. However, we must champion these causes for the sake of the nation, not merely for electoral gain. If we don’t advocate for what’s right now, we may jeopardize our ability to contest future elections.”
Reported contributions by Adam Wren and Cassandra Dumay.
