The Union of Concerned Scientists (UCS) is dedicated to using rigorous, fact-based science to advocate for policies that promote a safer and healthier world for all. In a time where science is being attacked and disregarded in policymaking, it is crucial to recognize the importance of scientific expertise in shaping responsible decisions for our collective security.
One of the pressing issues that UCS is currently addressing is the potential resumption of nuclear testing in the United States. This outdated practice, reminiscent of the 20th-century arms race, poses significant risks and threatens global stability. The US conducted over a thousand nuclear weapons tests from 1945 to 1992, more than any other nation. Despite this history, there are discussions in Washington about restarting nuclear testing, a move that could have catastrophic consequences.
As a senior scientist at UCS, I recently provided testimony in support of a Nevada state resolution (AJR13) urging the federal government to maintain the current moratorium on nuclear testing at the Nevada National Security Site. My expertise in materials science and physics related to nuclear weapons design and stewardship allowed me to emphasize the scientific evidence against resuming nuclear testing.
Modern scientific capabilities, including non-nuclear laboratory experiments and advanced computational tools, have rendered explosive nuclear testing unnecessary. The US national laboratories and the Nevada National Security Site possess superior scientific resources that can simulate nuclear weapon conditions with precision and accuracy. These tools have been instrumental in certifying the safety and reliability of the US nuclear stockpile for over two decades, making a return to testing both strategically unwise and environmentally hazardous.
Furthermore, resuming nuclear testing would jeopardize US security by potentially enabling other nations to catch up in testing expertise and sophistication. It would also undermine the longstanding global norm against nuclear testing, except for in the case of North Korea. The environmental and health risks associated with underground nuclear tests, as evidenced by past incidents in Nevada, further underscore the dangers of such a reckless decision.
In conclusion, there is no scientific or military justification for the US to resume nuclear testing. Doing so would only increase risks to the region, encourage further testing by adversaries, and erode US credibility in future arms control agreements. It is imperative that we prioritize scientific evidence and responsible policymaking to safeguard our collective future.
By joining the UCS Science Network, individuals can contribute their expertise to advocate for informed and sustainable policies that benefit society as a whole. Let us stand together in defense of science and the pursuit of a safer, healthier world for generations to come.
