Scott Adams has recently shared his insights on the forthcoming ‘No Kings’ protests, forecasting their utter ineffectiveness largely due to their apparent lack of substance beyond anti-Trump sentiments.
Adams notes that, given Trump’s recent diplomatic maneuvers in the Middle East, the protests are devoid of meaningful messaging.
He articulates his thoughts:
It seems they’re gearing up for the ‘No Kings’ protests this weekend. The premise is to reject any form of authoritarianism. But does anyone think that sentiment carries the same enthusiasm now as it did just a week ago?
Trump’s assertive leadership style has yielded results we’ve all witnessed. So, we have a rally protesting something that demonstrably works right in front of our eyes. Are they truly protesting a method that we observed to be effective? By ‘bullying’ those who required a firm hand to guide them?
The message behind this ‘No Kings’ endeavor appears vague. It exists merely to show that they oppose Trump. Can anyone articulate what tangible change this protest aims to foster? What are they really doing, aside from saying, “Look, we’re battling Trump”? Their peaceful protests merely labeled as ‘No Kings’. But what do they hope to achieve? Is there genuine hope that marching with signs will influence Trump’s decisions? Have they been neglecting their news feed? Don’t they see Trump’s accomplishments?
The question stands—what will these protests actually achieve? They seem to lack any true objectives or accomplishments. Such a movement almost feels devoid of purpose, doesn’t it?
Moreover, Adams insinuates that underlying these protests may be financial motives for the sponsors of such demonstrations.
Watch the entire commentary below:
NEW: @ScottAdamsSays boldly predicts that the upcoming “No Kings” protests will *FAIL MISERABLY* for Democrats.
“They claim they’re ‘fighting Trump’ — but what does that entail? A bunch of elderly folks marching with signs handed to them? Is that really their fight? Best of luck with that!” pic.twitter.com/HXLJShjn2w
— Jason Cohen (@JasonJournoDC) October 15, 2025
In summary, Adams succinctly captures the essence of the situation. The protesters’ message is essentially an expression of animosity towards Trump, a sentiment already widely recognized. Yet, they lack a clear purpose. This appears to serve merely as another outlet for the displeased left, demonstrating their frustration without any substantial direction.
Mike LaChance has been reporting on higher education and politics for Legal Insurrection since 2012. His contributions span various platforms, including Gateway Pundit, Daily Caller, Breitbart, the Center for Security Policy, Washington Free Beacon, and Ricochet. He has also penned articles for American Lookout, Townhall, and Twitchy.
You can email Mike LaChance here, and read more of Mike LaChance’s articles here.
