Friday, 31 Oct 2025
  • Contact
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms & Conditions
  • DMCA
logo logo
  • World
  • Politics
  • Crime
  • Economy
  • Tech & Science
  • Sports
  • Entertainment
  • More
    • Education
    • Celebrities
    • Culture and Arts
    • Environment
    • Health and Wellness
    • Lifestyle
  • 🔥
  • Trump
  • VIDEO
  • House
  • White
  • ScienceAlert
  • Trumps
  • Watch
  • man
  • Health
  • Season
Font ResizerAa
American FocusAmerican Focus
Search
  • World
  • Politics
  • Crime
  • Economy
  • Tech & Science
  • Sports
  • Entertainment
  • More
    • Education
    • Celebrities
    • Culture and Arts
    • Environment
    • Health and Wellness
    • Lifestyle
Follow US
© 2024 americanfocus.online – All Rights Reserved.
American Focus > Blog > Economy > Seigniorage – Econlib
Economy

Seigniorage – Econlib

Last updated: June 14, 2025 12:15 pm
Share
Seigniorage – Econlib
SHARE

In my post from June 10 regarding the penny, I noted:

The U.S. government profits quite handsomely from seigniorage—pun intended. While the revenue from this practice has dwindled due to the rising prevalence of credit cards and cryptocurrencies, it’s still a significant sum.

The crown jewel of seigniorage is undoubtedly the $100 bill. The cost to the federal government for printing one is a mere 9.4 cents. Thus, when the government circulates this $100 bill, it rakes in a tidy profit of $99.90. Not too shabby! Even for a $1 bill, which costs 3.2 cents to print, the government nets 97 cents.

In the comments section, Rob Rawlings expressed his confusion:

I’m a bit puzzled by the notion of the government earning seigniorage through the act of printing new notes. Correct me if I’m wrong, but wouldn’t they earn seigniorage when they repurchase their own bonds using newly created electronic money instead of when they print fresh paper notes? When they print these new notes to satisfy an increased demand for cash over electronic money, the associated costs of printing seem like a legitimate expense.

I concurred that while printing costs are real, they are minuscule compared to the face value of a $100 or even a $1 bill.

Rob then elaborated:

If a newly printed note is exchanged with a bank for an equivalent amount of base money, then where is the “net seigniorage”? It seems that the seigniorage occurred previously when the government created new base money by buying back bonds.

In my response, I inadvertently overlooked Rob’s insightful second sentence. I believe he is correct. The essential takeaway is that seigniorage exists, and he accurately pinpointed its location.

See also  Is it possible to achieve a perfect credit score of 850?

I realize now that I may have erred by introducing the term “net seigniorage,” as highlighted by my monetary theory and policy expert, Jeff Hummel, who provided the following insight:

It seems we have a difference in definitions. If you wish to define net seigniorage in your particular way, that’s perfectly fine and sometimes informative. However, the conventional view of seigniorage is that it acts like a tax (a tax on real cash balances), similar to explicit taxes and government borrowing, which are the other two primary revenue-generating methods for governments. Both of these mechanisms incur collection costs that could theoretically be netted out. Regardless of whether a new dollar is created through a coin, bill, or electronically as non-interest-bearing bank reserves, the ultimate burden on the government’s subjects (through a future decline in real cash balances) remains a dollar.

I find myself largely in agreement with Jeff. However, I’d like to be a touch pedantic and note that the burden of a tax isn’t merely the revenue collected (except in the case of a lump-sum tax). It also includes the deadweight loss incurred from people economizing on their real cash balances.

Upon reflection, some readers might mistakenly interpret my comments as advocating for the federal government to churn out more $100 bills. I am not.

Rather, I am making a more nuanced observation. Let’s assume the Federal Reserve has established an optimal monetary policy—though definitions of “optimal” will vary widely among experts like Scott Sumner and John Taylor. For the sake of argument, let’s hypothesize that this optimal policy presupposes no additional demand for U.S. currency from overseas. In other words, it assumes that whatever U.S. currency is currently held abroad is sufficient and that no further demand will materialize.

See also  “John Gibson’s a Cloud Powerhouse – Crushing It with SMBs”

However, what if additional demand does exist? In that scenario, the initial optimal monetary policy would no longer suffice. The optimal course of action would then be to print more $100 bills.

Note 1: Acknowledgments to Rob Rawlings for his thought-provoking points and to Jeff Hummel for aiding my understanding of the matter.

Note 2: Out of sheer whimsy, I instructed ChatGPT to illustrate a $100 bill, exaggerating the size of Ben Franklin’s head. Regardless of its dimensions, I think Franklin’s expression bears a certain resemblance to Jack Benny.

TAGGED:EconlibSeigniorage
Share This Article
Twitter Email Copy Link Print
Previous Article Do You Have To Take Out Required Minimum Distributions If You’re Working Full-Time? Suze Orman Breaks It Down Do You Have To Take Out Required Minimum Distributions If You’re Working Full-Time? Suze Orman Breaks It Down
Next Article Law Enforcement Looking For 57-Year-Old Man in Connection to Minnesota Shootings Law Enforcement Looking For 57-Year-Old Man in Connection to Minnesota Shootings
Leave a comment

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Popular Posts

3thix partners with Avalanche on web3 gaming ad data

3thix Partners with Avalanche to Launch Decentralized Ad-Tech Layer Web3 finance company 3thix has announced…

October 3, 2024

Peters signals progress on India trade deal negotiations

By Blessen Tom of RNZ Foreign Affairs Minister Winston Peters has suggested that New Zealand…

December 6, 2024

Can You File A Salmonella Claim Without Legal Assistance?

Ensuring the safety and cleanliness of the food we consume is essential to prevent food-borne…

April 8, 2025

Jamal Murray says he was “tested” for various illnesses before Game 6 masterclass

Denver Nuggets' Jamal Murray Delivers Heroic Performance in Game 6 to Force a Game 7…

May 15, 2025

Stocks that got hit the most from Trump’s tariffs before Mexico reprieve

The recent actions of President Donald Trump have sent shockwaves through the U.S. stock market,…

February 4, 2025

You Might Also Like

Market analysts react to Trump-Xi meet
Economy

Market analysts react to Trump-Xi meet

October 31, 2025
29 truck carrier files Chapter 11
Economy

29 truck carrier files Chapter 11

October 31, 2025
Trust Government Statistics, Not Government
Economy

Trust Government Statistics, Not Government

October 31, 2025
Jefferies Raises BP Price Target to 420 GBp, Maintains Hold Rating
Economy

Jefferies Raises BP Price Target to 420 GBp, Maintains Hold Rating

October 31, 2025
logo logo
Facebook Twitter Youtube

About US


Explore global affairs, political insights, and linguistic origins. Stay informed with our comprehensive coverage of world news, politics, and Lifestyle.

Top Categories
  • Crime
  • Environment
  • Sports
  • Tech and Science
Usefull Links
  • Contact
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms & Conditions
  • DMCA

© 2024 americanfocus.online –  All Rights Reserved.

Welcome Back!

Sign in to your account

Lost your password?