Astronomers Discover Evidence of Dark Stars in the Early Universe

A strange type of star could be powered by dark matter
Artsiom P/Shutterstock
Astronomers have recently uncovered compelling evidence supporting the existence of dark stars, a unique type of massive star in the early universe that is partially fueled by dark matter. This groundbreaking discovery could potentially elucidate the presence of exceptionally large black holes in the ancient cosmos, providing valuable insights into the mysteries of the universe. However, skepticism surrounds this revelation within the astronomical community.
The concept of dark stars was first proposed in 2007 by Katherine Freese and her team at the University of Texas at Austin. They postulated that during the early universe, extensive clouds of hydrogen and helium could have intermingled with a form of self-annihilating dark matter, resulting in the formation of massive, stable stars. These dark stars are distinct in that they lack conventional nuclear fusion processes found in typical stars, yet the energy generated by the dark matter prevents the collapse of the gas clouds into black holes, allowing them to evolve into star-like entities.
Initial evidence supporting the existence of dark stars emerged in 2022 when the James Webb Space Telescope (JWST) detected a series of exceptionally bright objects dating back to a few million years after the big bang. Although initially presumed to be galaxies, Freese and her team identified three of these objects that exhibited characteristics consistent with dark star simulations, such as a spherical shape and comparable light intensity. However, the lack of detailed spectroscopic data hindered a definitive confirmation.
Recent spectroscopic observations conducted by Freese and her colleagues using the JWST have demonstrated a strong alignment with theoretical predictions regarding the appearance of dark stars. Additionally, two new potential dark star candidates have been identified, with one showcasing traces of a peculiar helium variant lacking an electron—a distinctive trait that could serve as a definitive marker for dark stars if validated. Despite these promising findings, Freese acknowledges the limited evidence supporting this claim.
On the contrary, Daniel Whalen from the University of Portsmouth presents an alternative perspective, advocating for the plausibility of supermassive primordial stars as a dark matter-free explanation for the giant early stars observed by the JWST. He underscores the existence of a substantial body of literature on the formation of supermassive primordial stars that could yield signatures akin to those attributed to dark stars.
Freese rebuts these claims, asserting that dark matter remains the sole viable mechanism for the creation of such massive stars. She contends, “There’s really no other way to make them,” emphasizing the pivotal role of dark matter in the genesis of these enigmatic celestial bodies.
Notably, observations from the Atacama Large Millimeter Array (ALMA) in Chile have detected the presence of oxygen in the objects scrutinized by Freese and her team. Freese suggests that this oxygen may indicate the coexistence of dark stars with other stellar entities or companions. Conversely, Whalen interprets the presence of oxygen as evidence contradicting the dark star hypothesis, positing that the formation of dark stars would have been disrupted by supernova explosions from regular stars.
If Freese and her collaborators can substantiate their claims regarding the existence of dark stars, it could potentially resolve the perplexing abundance of large black holes identified by the JWST. By postulating that dark stars serve as precursors for these massive black holes, Freese proposes a plausible explanation for a longstanding astronomical enigma, emphasizing the transformative impact of this discovery on our understanding of the cosmos.