Friday, 31 Oct 2025
  • Contact
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms & Conditions
  • DMCA
logo logo
  • World
  • Politics
  • Crime
  • Economy
  • Tech & Science
  • Sports
  • Entertainment
  • More
    • Education
    • Celebrities
    • Culture and Arts
    • Environment
    • Health and Wellness
    • Lifestyle
  • 🔥
  • Trump
  • VIDEO
  • House
  • White
  • ScienceAlert
  • Trumps
  • Watch
  • man
  • Health
  • Season
Font ResizerAa
American FocusAmerican Focus
Search
  • World
  • Politics
  • Crime
  • Economy
  • Tech & Science
  • Sports
  • Entertainment
  • More
    • Education
    • Celebrities
    • Culture and Arts
    • Environment
    • Health and Wellness
    • Lifestyle
Follow US
© 2024 americanfocus.online – All Rights Reserved.
American Focus > Blog > Environment > Weaponising solar geoengineering
Environment

Weaponising solar geoengineering

Last updated: February 4, 2025 8:02 am
Share
Weaponising solar geoengineering
SHARE

Solar Geoengineering: Risks and Consequences

A coalition of more than 500 academics from over 60 countries has signed an open letter supporting the initiative of solar radiation modification (SRM). However, there is growing concern among experts about the potential risks associated with deploying this technology as a climate policy option.

Radiation Concerns
Frank Biermann, a professor of global sustainability governance at Utrecht University, expressed his deep concern about the recent developments in solar radiation modification. He highlighted the unknown risks of SRM deployment, the lack of global governance mechanisms to handle such planetary-scale intervention technologies, and the potential delay or derailment of efforts to mitigate climate risks by reducing greenhouse gas emissions.

The Royal Society of Chemistry’s scientific assessment and other reports have indicated that implementing SRM, such as Stratospheric Aerosol Injection (SAI), could lead to negative consequences like heatwaves, droughts, ozone depletion, and disruptions to weather and climate patterns. These impacts could have severe effects on human health, marine and terrestrial species, and ecosystems.

Halted Deployment
The deployment of SAI could also disrupt hydrological cycles, influence extreme weather events, and pose significant health risks due to the inhalation of suspended particles. Moreover, the sudden halt of SAI could lead to a rapid temperature increase, known as the “termination shock,” which would be challenging to manage.

Geopolitical Risks
There are concerns about the geopolitical dynamics surrounding the research, development, and deployment of Solar Geoengineering (SG) technologies. Decision-making may not be solely guided by climate risk management but also influenced by factors like security, control, and economics. The lack of a comprehensive multilateral governance framework leaves the world vulnerable to the unchecked consequences of SG.

See also  Why Data Centers and Nuclear Plants Can’t Just ‘Go It Alone’

Weaponization Threat
The weaponization of SG technology could deepen global inequality, escalate conflicts, and be used as a strategic tool in negotiations or conflicts. There is a risk of unilateral SG initiatives being perceived as threats to national security, leading to destabilizing actions.

Tempting Measures
The US is currently the only nation with the capacity for unilateral SG deployment, raising concerns about potential radical measures under new administrations. The risks posed by framing SG as a solution to climate change or narrowing the issue to temperature alone are highlighted as tempting but potentially dangerous approaches.

Public Participation
Evaluating SG in relation to climate risks, comparing alternative approaches like degrowth or fossil fuel phase-outs, and considering geopolitical, ethical, and social risks alongside environmental ones are crucial. Public participation throughout the decision-making process is essential to identify risks and determine appropriate actions.

Conclusion
The risks and consequences of solar geoengineering are complex and far-reaching. As discussions around SG continue, it is vital to consider the potential impacts on climate, environment, geopolitics, and society. Responsible research, governance, and public participation are key to navigating the challenges posed by SG technologies.

About the Author
Monica Piccinini is a freelance writer focusing on environmental, health, and human rights issues. She is a regular contributor to The Ecologist and brings a critical perspective to complex topics like solar geoengineering.

TAGGED:geoengineeringsolarWeaponising
Share This Article
Twitter Email Copy Link Print
Previous Article Bonobos Can Tell When a Human Doesn’t Know Something Bonobos Can Tell When a Human Doesn’t Know Something
Next Article Estee Lauder to cut up to 7,000 jobs as sales slide Estee Lauder to cut up to 7,000 jobs as sales slide
Leave a comment

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Popular Posts

Why Max Greenfield Is Genuinely Not Sad About The Neighborhood Ending

After eight successful seasons, the beloved sitcom "The Neighborhood" is coming to an end. However,…

April 11, 2025

Why Progressive Stock Tumbled by Almost 6% Today

The insurance company released its earnings report for the third quarter. It fell short of…

October 17, 2025

Mailed self-sample kits boosted cervical cancer screening

Receiving a sample collection kit by mail has proven to be a game-changer for people…

June 24, 2025

“People Are Gonna Go Hungry” – AOC on the Verge of Tears After House Passes President Trump’s ‘Big Beautiful Bill’ (VIDEO) |

In a display of palpable frustration, Representative Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (NY) expressed her dismay following the…

July 3, 2025

Ranking Pittsburgh Penguins’ all-time Top 5 strongest NHL draft classes

The Pittsburgh Penguins are facing a crucial juncture as they gear up for the 2025…

June 23, 2025

You Might Also Like

China Has the Most to Gain from New Nuclear Tests
Environment

China Has the Most to Gain from New Nuclear Tests

October 31, 2025
Guest Idea: How Communities Can View Real-Time Satellite Images to Respond to Natural Disasters
Environment

Guest Idea: How Communities Can View Real-Time Satellite Images to Respond to Natural Disasters

October 31, 2025
Trump officials say, ‘Alaska is open for business. No one’s buying.
Environment

Trump officials say, ‘Alaska is open for business. No one’s buying.

October 31, 2025
Waitrose ‘relies on animal welfare myths’
Environment

Waitrose ‘relies on animal welfare myths’

October 31, 2025
logo logo
Facebook Twitter Youtube

About US


Explore global affairs, political insights, and linguistic origins. Stay informed with our comprehensive coverage of world news, politics, and Lifestyle.

Top Categories
  • Crime
  • Environment
  • Sports
  • Tech and Science
Usefull Links
  • Contact
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms & Conditions
  • DMCA

© 2024 americanfocus.online –  All Rights Reserved.

Welcome Back!

Sign in to your account

Lost your password?