Friday, 31 Oct 2025
  • Contact
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms & Conditions
  • DMCA
logo logo
  • World
  • Politics
  • Crime
  • Economy
  • Tech & Science
  • Sports
  • Entertainment
  • More
    • Education
    • Celebrities
    • Culture and Arts
    • Environment
    • Health and Wellness
    • Lifestyle
  • 🔥
  • Trump
  • VIDEO
  • House
  • White
  • ScienceAlert
  • Trumps
  • Watch
  • man
  • Health
  • Season
Font ResizerAa
American FocusAmerican Focus
Search
  • World
  • Politics
  • Crime
  • Economy
  • Tech & Science
  • Sports
  • Entertainment
  • More
    • Education
    • Celebrities
    • Culture and Arts
    • Environment
    • Health and Wellness
    • Lifestyle
Follow US
© 2024 americanfocus.online – All Rights Reserved.
American Focus > Blog > Economy > Why Classical Liberals Should be Skeptical of DOGE
Economy

Why Classical Liberals Should be Skeptical of DOGE

Last updated: April 13, 2025 2:06 pm
Share
Why Classical Liberals Should be Skeptical of DOGE
SHARE

Charlie Munger famously remarked that “it’s not the bad ideas that do you in, but the good ones.” This aphorism has sparked debate; some interpret it as a warning against becoming too attached to ideas that may not yield results. Alternatively, it can be seen as a caution against the perils of poorly executed “good” ideas, which may inflict greater damage than simply being ignored. This perspective seems particularly relevant in the context of the Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE).

Before delving into the criticisms, it’s worth acknowledging that DOGE has successfully initiated a discussion or “vibe shift” around the seemingly relentless growth of government spending. At least it’s a step in the right direction regarding how we view federal expenditures. As it stands, federal spending is still nearly $1 trillion above pre-pandemic levels, projected to reach a staggering $6.75 trillion in 2024.

Many advocates of classical liberalism resonate with DOGE’s assertions that government spending is rampant. However, the method by which these reforms are pursued is equally critical. To date, DOGE’s actions have been erratic; while they tout transparency, the reality may be more misleading than it appears. Numerous instances of questionable accounting practices and outright errors have inflated their claims of cost savings. Experts have raised concerns about the legitimacy of these figures, which raises questions about the integrity of their approach.

Legal challenges are surfacing that question the constitutionality of DOGE’s actions, particularly concerning Congress’s exclusive authority over the “power of the purse.” If the President can retroactively decide not to spend money allocated by Congress, it opens a Pandora’s box for future administrations to expand government spending without legislative oversight.

See also  ‘I promise I’ll behave’: Congress’ most mercurial Republican faces DOGE, Signalgate anger

Even Ayn Rand, not exactly the poster child for government advocacy, emphasized the importance of procedural integrity in budget cuts. She cautioned against arbitrary reductions and emphasized the need for proper adjustments to avoid chaos in resource allocation. A thoughtful transition period allows markets to recalibrate and adapt to a new fiscal landscape.

Additionally, DOGE faces an inherent accounting dilemma. While they have made some progress in trimming wasteful expenditures, these cuts represent just a minor fraction of the grand promises made. Elon Musk and former DOGE member Vivek Ramaswamy boldly claimed they could “easily” eliminate $1-2 trillion in waste and fraud. However, as I pointed out previously, a substantial portion of government spending is not easily reducible without fundamental systemic changes. The reality is stark.

My concern with DOGE’s erratic approach is that it may inadvertently hinder meaningful reforms needed for long-term fiscal sustainability. The U.S. government’s debt trajectory has reached alarming heights in the 21st century. If DOGE does not prioritize procedural rigor alongside cost-cutting, the political momentum necessary for genuine fiscal reform may dissipate. There’s still an opportunity for DOGE to operate within constitutional boundaries and pave the way for substantive spending reforms. Failure to do so could irreparably tarnish their reputation, making it even more challenging for proponents of classical liberalism to advocate for a leaner, more efficient government.


Justin Callais is the Chief Economist with the Archbridge Institute and Co-Editor of Profectus Magazine. He has a Substack on economic prosperity called Debunking Degrowth.

TAGGED:ClassicalDOGELiberalsskeptical
Share This Article
Twitter Email Copy Link Print
Previous Article Russia targets Ukrainian city on Palm Sunday Russia targets Ukrainian city on Palm Sunday
Next Article 3 robberies reported along Wrigleyville bar strip overnight 3 robberies reported along Wrigleyville bar strip overnight
Leave a comment

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Popular Posts

Highlights of My Weekly Reading, August 25, 2024

Analysis of Recent Economic Developments by Donald J. Boudreaux, American Institute for Economic Research, August…

August 25, 2024

Forget folds—Samsung’s next trick could be a massive phone you roll up

Samsung is rumored to be working on a groundbreaking new phone design that could revolutionize…

September 16, 2024

NEW: Biden Judge Assigned to Comey’s Criminal Case | The Gateway Pundit | by Cristina Laila

On a rather dramatic evening, a judge appointed by President Biden has been entrusted to…

September 26, 2025

Illegal Border Crossings Plummet to Another New Record Low – The White House

July marked yet another milestone in the saga of U.S. immigration, with illegal crossings at…

August 1, 2025

What Do Trump’s Attacks on NOAA Have to Do with the Gulf Dead Zone?

Scientists from the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) and a consortium of universities have…

July 31, 2025

You Might Also Like

Trust Government Statistics, Not Government
Economy

Trust Government Statistics, Not Government

October 31, 2025
Jefferies Raises BP Price Target to 420 GBp, Maintains Hold Rating
Economy

Jefferies Raises BP Price Target to 420 GBp, Maintains Hold Rating

October 31, 2025
Dan Ives’ AI ETF Hits B in Assets Just Five Months After Launch
Economy

Dan Ives’ AI ETF Hits $1B in Assets Just Five Months After Launch

October 31, 2025
Is This The Best ETF to Invest In Ahead of Potential AI Bubble Burst?
Economy

Is This The Best ETF to Invest In Ahead of Potential AI Bubble Burst?

October 31, 2025
logo logo
Facebook Twitter Youtube

About US


Explore global affairs, political insights, and linguistic origins. Stay informed with our comprehensive coverage of world news, politics, and Lifestyle.

Top Categories
  • Crime
  • Environment
  • Sports
  • Tech and Science
Usefull Links
  • Contact
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms & Conditions
  • DMCA

© 2024 americanfocus.online –  All Rights Reserved.

Welcome Back!

Sign in to your account

Lost your password?