In the aftermath of yet another tragic shooting involving immigration agents, a contentious blame game has erupted between the Trump administration and Minnesota officials concerning the circumstances surrounding the death of 37-year-old Alex Pretti.
This disagreement goes beyond mere interpretations; it involves distinctly different narratives about the event and its triggers.
Pretti was shot and killed by Border Patrol agents during a fraught encounter that has become symptomatic of the escalating tensions as the Trump administration intensifies its nationwide immigration enforcement efforts. Notably, this incident followed closely on the heels of another shooting involving Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) that resulted in the death of 37-year-old Renee Good, with the two scenes separated by just two miles. In both cases, public outrage manifested in protests.
Conflicting accounts have surfaced regarding the incident, particularly concerning the nature of Pretti’s actions during the confrontation. Verified video footage analyzed by several reputable media organizations, including the New York Times, suggests that Pretti was holding a cellphone, not a weapon, while attempting to assist a woman who had been pushed to the ground by Border Patrol agents. According to a Washington Post analysis, Pretti’s firearm was reportedly secured by federal agents mere moments before he was shot.
âWhat you see is someone brandishing a cellphone who is simply there with a cellphone helping someone up, a woman up, as his parents point out, when she had slipped,â said Sen. Amy Klobuchar (D-Minn.) during her appearance on NBCâs âMeet the Press.â She added, âAnd so when I hear these officials from the Trump administration describe this video in ways that simply arenât true, I just keep thinking, âYour eyes donât lie.ââ
Border Patrol commander Greg Bovino claimed that Pretti had âinjectedâ himself into a law enforcement operation, while Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem asserted that Pretti had committed a âfelonyâ by interfering with law enforcement. Additionally, Deputy Attorney General Todd Blanche placed blame on local state officials, labeling the shooting as an âentirely avoidableâ incident.


Contrarily, Minnesota officials interpret the footage differently. Minneapolis Police Chief Brian OâHara stated that Pretti was lawfully armed, exercising his constitutional rights, and Klobuchar reiterated that the video depicted him aiding a woman, rather than threatening federal agents.
Following the incident, Noem provided her version, claiming that Pretti âapproached U.S. Border Patrol officers with a 9mm semi-automatic handgunâ and âviolently resistedâ efforts to disarm him. She further stated that agents had acted out of fear for their safety.
âWe do know that he came to that scene and impeded a law enforcement operation, which is against federal law. It’s a felony,â Noem asserted. âWhen he did that, interacting with those agents when they tried to get him to disengage, he became aggressive and resisted them throughout that process.â


Notably, despite Noem’s assertion that the agents acted out of fear, OâHara maintained during an interview on CBSâ âFace the Nationâ that no evidence suggested Pretti had brandished a weapon during the encounter.
âYou have a Second Amendment right in the United States to possess a firearm,â OâHara emphasized. âAnd there are some restrictions around that in Minnesota, and everything that we see that we are aware of shows that he did not violate any of those restrictions.â
However, in a conversation on CNNâs âState of the Union,â Bovino countered that a personâs Second Amendment rights âdonât count when you riot and assault, delay, obstruct and impede law enforcement officers.â
Noem seemed to imply that Pretti’s possession of âa gun and ammunition, rather than a sign,â indicated that the scene was a âviolent riot.â
âWe have someone showing up with weapons and are using them to assault law enforcement officers,â she remarked regarding the situation.

Klobuchar reiterated, âWhat you see is someone brandishing a cellphone who is simply there with a cellphone helping someone up, a woman up, as his parents point out, when she had slipped.â She expressed concern over the Trump administration’s portrayal of the event, stating that âYour eyes donât lie.â
Former President Barack Obama also remarked that the Trump administrationâs explanations âappear to be directly contradicted by video evidence.â Meanwhile, Prettiâs family has accused the White House of disseminating âsickening lies.â
This incident resembles the aftermath of Goodâs shooting, with federal and state officials at odds over accountability and the handling of the situation.
Blanche described Prettiâs shooting as a âtragedyâ but remarked that âthis was entirely avoidable if we had a governor, if we had a mayor, if we had leadership in Washington and over in Minnesota that actually cared about their citizens.â

However, Gov. Tim Walz and local officials argue that the chaos stems from the Trump administration’s actions. In response to Prettiâs death, Walz mobilized the National Guard to Minneapolis, labeling the event as âsickening.â
âI just spoke with the White House after another horrific shooting by federal agents this morning. Minnesota has had it. This is sickening,â Walz tweeted. âThe President must end this operation. Pull the thousands of violent, untrained officers out of Minnesota. Now.â
âThis administration and everyone involved in this operation should be reflecting. They should be reflecting right now and asking themselves, what exactly are you accomplishing?â Minneapolis Mayor Jacob Frey, a Democrat, stated at a Saturday press conference. âIf the goal was to achieve peace and safety, this is doing exactly the opposite. If the goal was to achieve calm and prosperity, this is doing exactly the opposite.â

