Man Trying to Serve Taylor Swift in Baldoni Lawsuit Arrested at Travis Kelce’s Home

A noteworthy incident unfolded at Travis Kelce’s home, where a process server aiming to deliver Taylor Swift deposition papers, linked to Justin Baldoni’s legal team, led to his arrest.

The bizarre turn of events transpired earlier this month when one Justin Lee Fisher was apprehended at the NFL player’s estate situated in Leawood, Kansas.

Legal documents accessed by sources, first reported by Star, reveal that Fisher faced charges for trespassing into a private property. He was detained at approximately 2 AM on September 15 during this rather ambitious endeavor to serve the pop superstar with legal papers. Reports indicate that both Taylor and Travis were present in the home at the time.

Taylor Swift’s involvement in the ongoing Blake Lively-Baldoni feud began earlier this year when Baldoni unexpectedly included her in a $400 million countersuit.

Sources reveal that Baldoni had a heated confrontation with Blake in a New York City penthouse during the filming of “It Ends With Us,” feeling caught off guard when Blake’s husband, Ryan Reynolds, and her close friend, Taylor, unexpectedly joined the meeting.

Baldoni disclosed text conversations where Blake referred to Ryan and Taylor as her “dragons,” revealing the deep connections and the tensions arising from this dramatic saga.

Following these revelations, insiders claim Taylor felt manipulated by Blake amid the escalating legal disputes, culminating in a significant falling out between them.

Baldoni’s legal representatives submitted court documents asserting that Taylor was requested for a deposition, albeit stating her availability was limited until the end of October. Notably, just two days prior to the arrest of the process server, Taylor’s legal counsel communicated with the judge, clarifying that she had not consented to participate in the deposition linked to the “It Ends With Us” case.

An insider disclosed to TMZ that the judge denied an extension request from Baldoni’s side, suggesting that they had squandered the opportunity to timely secure a deposition date for Taylor.

Presumably, Fisher was endeavoring to serve a subpoena for a deposition that coincided with the nearing deadline of September 30.

Had he succeeded—though sources indicate he did not—Taylor would have found herself needing to justify to the judge her unavailability for a deposition within the forthcoming week.