In the ever-evolving landscape of American politics, few figures have managed to stir up as much controversy as Michigan’s Secretary of State, Jocelyn Benson (MI-D). On any given day, she could easily be labeled the most divisive elected official on “X.” Regardless of her stance on progressive or anti-Republican issues, Benson faces relentless criticism for perceived dishonesty and what many consider to be her misguided, anti-American perspectives.
In a recent incident, Benson drew sharp criticism for a post on “X” that seemingly sympathized with rioters in Los Angeles, stating she was praying for their safety. This move has sparked speculation about the viability of her political future, reminiscent of Kamala Harris’s own controversial call to action back in June 2020, which involved soliciting funds to bail out individuals involved in the unrest following George Floyd’s tragic death.
The fallout from Harris’s actions was significant. For instance, George Howard, who was freed on a $1,500 bond promoted by Harris, later became embroiled in a road rage incident that tragically resulted in a murder charge. Such consequences raised serious questions about the implications of political figures endorsing bail funds amidst civil unrest—a topic that resurfaced during Harris’s unsuccessful 2024 presidential bid.
As violent protests unfold in LA, could Jocelyn Benson’s recent social media endorsement of the rioters represent a critical misstep in her political career?
Benson, leveraging her status as a military spouse, expressed her disapproval of federal intervention during the protests on her “X” account. She stated, “As a military spouse whose career is inspired by the bravery of citizens who stood up for democracy during the civil rights movement—and the National Guard who protected them—I am appalled that President Trump is deploying our own military to quell protests against his regime.”
In a surprising turn, she invoked the notion of prayer, stating, “I pray that no law-abiding people are hurt or worse due to this flagrant, tyrannical abuse of power.” This is particularly ironic, given her history of communication, which seldom features sentiments of faith or compassion—making her sudden piety seem almost theatrical.
They are tearing up infrastructure to use as weapons. pic.twitter.com/QqbpTgfOtr
— LilRascal (@rascal113646) June 9, 2025
Jocelyn Benson, who has faced scrutiny over her trustworthiness, is now positioning herself as a defender of those engaging in violent acts—throwing rocks at law enforcement, setting vehicles ablaze, and obstructing essential services in Los Angeles.
As a military spouse whose career is inspired by the bravery of citizens who stood up for democracy during the civil rights movement—and the National Guard who protected them—I am appalled that President Trump is deploying our own military to quell protests against his regime.…
— Jocelyn Benson (@JocelynBenson) June 8, 2025
Benson’s attempt to invoke her husband’s military service as a shield for her political stance raises eyebrows, particularly since her husband, Ryan Friedrichs, has himself been implicated in a scandal involving the deletion of public records. This association complicates her narrative of integrity.
Did your husband Ryan Friedrichs, teach you how to hide election documents and data the MI House is entitled to see?
It might be a good idea to not use his name to boost your credibility since you both seem to have a problem w/ transparency and a willingness to break the law. pic.twitter.com/r7V9pwiuRa
— PattyMI (@PattyLovesTruth) June 9, 2025
In 2019, allegations emerged against Ryan Friedrichs regarding his involvement in a scheme to erase public emails tied to a nonprofit connected to Detroit’s Mayor, raising serious concerns about accountability and governance.
The Detroit Office of the Inspector General’s report found that Friedrichs, along with others, acted to delete records under the direction of a city official, a move described as “egregious” and “troubling.” Despite the gravity of the allegations, no charges were filed against him.
This backdrop of questionable ethics only amplifies the skepticism surrounding Benson’s political aspirations, particularly as her recent “X” post has generated a striking 266 retweets, 373 likes, and nearly 2,000 negative comments.
Michigan Senator Jonathan Lindsey emphasized the implications of Benson’s post, stating, “Remember the time the leading Dem candidate for governor in Michigan, Jocelyn Benson, sided with foreign invaders over U.S. law enforcement?”
Remember the time the leading Dem candidate for governor in Michigan, @JocelynBenson, sided with foreign invaders over U.S. law enforcement?
— Senator Jonathan Lindsey (@SenLindsey) June 8, 2025
Benson’s defense of those engaging in unlawful activities raises critical questions about her priorities and judgment as a potential governor:
She appears to be prioritizing the chaos of the streets over the safety and order that law enforcement strives to maintain. This could be interpreted as a tactic to obscure the legal actions taken against undocumented individuals in the U.S.
These are the illegal criminals America’s dirtiest SOS is defending.
Jocelyn Benson doesn’t want our National Guard to restore law & order in LA, because she knows instability & chaos are key for confusing Americans about how ICE is LEGALLY removing illegal criminals from U.S. pic.twitter.com/dipl0gfX5D
— PattyMI (@PattyLovesTruth) June 8, 2025
In conclusion, MI House Rep Brad Paquette succinctly captured the sentiment surrounding Benson’s recent post, declaring it the death knell for her gubernatorial campaign.
Stick a fork in your campaign for Michigan Governor with this post.
Looks like it’s done.
Comparing military service to illegal immigrants with Mexican flags rioting?
No Bueno.
— Brad Paquette (@BradPaquetteMI) June 8, 2025
As the political narrative continues to unfold, it remains to be seen whether Jocelyn Benson can navigate the turbulent waters of public perception and emerge unscathed—or if her latest actions will ultimately seal her political fate.
