In light of the escalating climate crisis, there is a growing urgency to hold fossil fuel companies accountable for their decades of deception. Legal actions have been taken by governments representing over a quarter of the US population against major corporations like ExxonMobil, Chevron, Shell, and BP, seeking justice for the harm caused by their misleading information about the dangers of their products. With the impending change in administration and the nomination of officials with a questionable stance on science, the courts are becoming a crucial battleground for advancing climate justice.
These lawsuits are heavily reliant on the best available scientific evidence to uncover the truth and inform court proceedings. The Union of Concerned Scientists (UCS) is actively involved in collaborating with social scientists, economists, civil engineers, and health practitioners to provide expertise in multi-faceted litigation. As the fossil fuel industry continues to obscure the facts, the role of scientists in climate litigation becomes increasingly vital. They bring clarity, evidence, and credibility to a high-stakes battle where the future of lives and the planet is at stake.
To assist scientists from various disciplines who are considering involvement in climate litigation, Delta Merner, Lead Scientist for UCS’s Science Hub for Climate Litigation, offers guidance. Merner’s extensive research and expertise have been instrumental in informing climate litigation globally, connecting legal teams with technical experts and conducting training sessions for scientists working at the intersection of climate science and law.
In response to a question about scientists feeling inadequate to participate in climate litigation, Merner emphasizes that the core process of asking robust questions, conducting thorough research, and communicating findings remains similar to scientific research. The transition into the legal arena might require some adjustment in terms of audience and format, but the fundamental skills are transferable. Drawing from personal experiences, Merner highlights the importance of effectively communicating complex scientific evidence to meet the legal system’s standards while upholding scientific integrity.
Merner acknowledges the significance of seeking guidance and learning from experienced experts when transitioning into the legal arena. The Science Hub for Climate Litigation, initiated by UCS, provides a platform for scientists, communicators, and legal experts to collaborate and learn from each other, fostering a community where insights and experiences can be shared to enhance the impact of scientific expertise in legal proceedings.
The discussion also delves into the critical role of scientists in informing climate litigation, highlighting the need for robust, timely, and litigation-relevant research to support legal cases. Addressing gaps in scientific research, such as attribution science, health impacts, and economic analysis, can significantly contribute to shaping the outcomes of climate litigation and driving meaningful change.
Looking ahead to the climate litigation landscape in 2025, Merner emphasizes the high stakes involved in cases that could set major precedents for addressing the climate crisis. International courts like the International Court of Justice and the Inter-American Court of Human Rights are considering cases that could influence future climate action and underscore the link between climate change and fundamental human rights. In the US, ongoing lawsuits against major fossil fuel corporations aim to hold them accountable for deceiving the public about climate change and the impacts of their products.
In conclusion, Merner emphasizes the importance of communicating the value of scientists’ involvement in climate litigation and increasing engagement among scientists to recognize their pivotal role in legal processes. By supporting scientists in contributing their expertise to legal proceedings, a stronger connection between science and the legal system can be established, empowering courts to drive meaningful change. Those interested in joining the UCS Science Hub for Climate Litigation can learn more and get involved today.
