Jamieson Greer, the U.S. Trade Representative, has set his sights on Australia’s forthcoming ‘Revive’ National Cultural Policy, which is stirring up quite the conversation across the Pacific.
In a recent social media post, Greer pointed fingers at Australia as one of the nations purportedly “undercutting” the U.S. film industry. It seems the land down under is not just known for its kangaroos and didgeridoos, but also for luring Hollywood productions away from American shores.
On May 23, Greer highlighted the Trump administration’s bid to revive big-budget Hollywood by appointing “special ambassadors” tasked with wooing filmmakers back to the U.S. This initiative follows the administration’s approval of a 100 percent tariff on films produced outside the U.S., though the specifics of this tariff remain shrouded in mystery.
Greer lamented on X, “Over 80 countries provide production tax incentives, which has led to many films that could have been made in the United States being filmed elsewhere.” He noted that blockbuster titles have found cozy homes in Canada, Croatia, France, New Zealand, and beyond, as U.S. production saw a 26 percent drop in 2024 compared to 2021.
He specifically mentioned Australia’s upcoming National Cultural Policy, aptly named “Revive.” “This policy, launched in January 2023, suggests that streaming services should adhere to Australian content quotas, which could siphon off between $220 million and $440 million annually from U.S. platforms into Australian productions,” Greer argued.
Current Quotas Explained
The Revive policy proposes content quotas that would compel broadcasters and streaming platforms to invest in or air a certain amount of local Australian content, all in the name of preserving cultural integrity.
Under this model, streaming giants would be required to allocate a portion of their locally-sourced revenue—up to 30 percent for the largest services—specifically for Australian drama. An additional proposal suggests that 10 percent of their revenue be directed toward new local productions, with potential for that figure to rise to 20 percent as the policy matures.
Vladimir Tyazhelnikov, a senior lecturer in economics and global tariffs expert, noted, “Countries often rely on local content quotas. For instance, France and Australia enforce domestic content requirements, while China tightly controls foreign film licenses with strict annual limits,” in a statement from the University of Sydney.
Despite efforts to advance this policy, The Epoch Times reached out to Tony Burke, Australia’s Minister for Arts and Culture, for a comment but received no response in time for publication. Meanwhile, during Senate Estimates in May 2024, officials from the Department of Communications confirmed that the Revive initiative was still undergoing refinement before being presented to the Cabinet.
However, the proposal has encountered hurdles, with trade experts and industry stakeholders expressing concerns that these quotas could breach the Australia–United States Free Trade Agreement (AUSFTA).
Australia’s Reaction Thus Far
Australia’s ambassador to the U.S., Kevin Rudd, a former Labor Prime Minister, has recently raised alarms regarding the 100 percent tariff on imported films. At a public forum, he cautioned that such a tax could stifle cultural exchange. “I don’t think we want to see a tax on Bluey,” he quipped, referring to the immensely popular Brisbane-born children’s show that has taken the American streaming scene by storm.
Concerns about the potential fallout on the Australian film industry are also being voiced, given its heavy dependence on U.S. productions. Mike Seymour, an Emmy-nominated visual effects expert and senior lecturer at the University of Sydney Business School, warned, “The ramifications for Australia could be swift and severe. States like New South Wales and Queensland have established thriving screen production sectors, attracting significant international projects such as Thor: Love and Thunder, Elvis, and Shang-Chi and the Legend of the Ten Rings. These productions inject millions into local economies and support a vast network of jobs across various sectors—from set design to visual effects and post-production.”
Seymour added, “As Australian screen content faces pressure from the rise of global streaming platforms and the decline of traditional broadcasting, these international collaborations are becoming increasingly critical.”
If You Found This Article Interesting, Please Consider Supporting Traditional Journalism
Since our inception 25 years ago, The Epoch Times has committed itself to delivering fact-based, award-winning journalism to millions of Americans, starting from humble beginnings in a basement in Atlanta.
Our journalists have faced threats, arrests, and assaults, yet our resolve to uphold independent journalism remains steadfast. This year marks our 25th anniversary of reporting free from corporate and political influence.
That’s why we invite you to take advantage of a limited-time introductory offer—just $1 per week—to join the millions already celebrating independent news.
