Despite Misinformation from Washington, Environmental Justice Is About Common Sense, Fairness, and Access to Clean Air and Clean Water for All

As we navigate the complexities of climate change and its far-reaching impacts, the concepts of environmental and climate justice stand as essential pillars of fairness and equity. Addressing issues such as clean air, safe water, and secure spaces for children to thrive is crucial in ensuring that no community is disproportionately affected by natural disasters like hurricanes, droughts, and wildfires. Climate equity demands that we consider the well-being of all, recognizing that pollution and climate vulnerabilities are tied closely to race and socioeconomic status. Ultimately, the goal of our climate strategies should be to foster resilience and protection for all community members, particularly in neighborhoods already overburdened by pollution.

In June, attorneys general from states like California, Massachusetts, New York, and several others took a significant stand by issuing a Multi-State Guidance Affirming the Importance and Legality of Environmental Justice Initiatives. This guidance was a response to the previous administration’s systematic efforts to undermine environmental justice policies. On his first day in office, President Trump signed an executive order intended to dismantle many programs aimed at achieving equality, including significant environmental justice initiatives. The impact of this order continues to affect vulnerable communities facing environmental injustices.

Indeed, the essence of environmental and climate justice lies in their alignment with the historical framework of equal protection under the law as enshrined in the 5^th and 14^th Amendments to the U.S. Constitution. These amendments uphold the principle that no individual should face discrimination based on race, color, or national origin by governmental entities. Efforts designed to further environmental justice resonate with these historic ideals of fairness and equality and are entirely compatible with legal mandates. However, the deeply-rooted legacy of discrimination still lingers, particularly in land use and environmental exposures.

The Starting Point: The Promise of Equal Protection

The Civil Rights Movement in the 1960s marked a pivotal moment in breaking racial barriers and advocating for justice across various domains, including education, housing, and healthcare. However, the historical context of zoning practices such as redlining set the stage for persistent racial disparities in environmental benefits and burdens. The Environmental Justice Movement has played a crucial role in spotlighting the connections between race, class, and pollution across the nation, as evidenced by studies such as Toxic Wastes and Race, published in 1987.

It is important to prioritize addressing environmental inequalities, especially given that conditions such as pollution significantly impact public health outcomes. The Centers for Disease Control stress that environmental conditions directly serve as social determinants of health, influencing life expectancies across diverse populations. No individual should have to endure increased exposure to pollutants or face a heightened risk of serious health events based on their race, income, or community.

What’s at Issue: Environmental Justice Policies and Programs

Prior to its suspension, Executive Order 14096, titled Revitalizing Our Nation’s Commitment to Environmental Justice for All, offered a comprehensive government-wide definition of environmental justice. This order emphasized the importance of engagement and fair treatment of all individuals in decision-making processes that affect their health and environment, regardless of socio-economic status. Such principles are not merely convenient; they resonate deeply with both constitutional mandates and the notion of equitable governance.

Moreover, environmental and climate justice initiatives—and the accompanying policies—are aligned with legal statutes and ultimately serve the public good. They play essential roles in responding to pressing local challenges, including:

• Implementing reliable energy solutions in rural regions, like those championed by the Alaska Native Tribal Health Consortium, which enhance energy security and alleviate utility costs for residents.
• Empowering communities with initiatives that expand bike-sharing, adopt renewable energy at public transit hubs, clear contaminants from local waters, remediate lead infrastructure, restore wetlands, mitigate food waste, and improve emergency preparedness.
• Utilizing tools like EJ Screen and the Climate and Economic Justice Screening Tool (CEJST), which equip federal and state officials with crucial data to enhance environmental justice programs and protect community health.

These programs clearly remain within the bounds of legality and reflect the urgent need for action.

The President Cannot Unilaterally Declare Legal Activities “Illegal”

The campaign against environmental justice by the previous administration has disrupted legal and necessary programs aimed at fostering community well-being. Following the President’s January 20 Executive Order, efforts were made to dismantle various environmental justice initiatives, obstruct vital funding, and undermine the personnel dedicated to these crucial functions. However, it is imperative to understand that presidential actions cannot redefine legal frameworks through executive orders.

The repercussions of these decisions are significant; community organizations and local governments face funding cuts leading to layoffs and stalling of vital projects aimed at improving infrastructure and public health safety. Ongoing lawsuits challenge these arbitrary actions, highlighting the struggle against governmental overreach.

Environmental Justice is Consistent with This Country’s Mandate for Equal Protection

The role of state attorneys general is vital in this context. They defend legal claims on behalf of their states and also provide legally sound guidance as needed. The previously mentioned Multi-State Guidance unequivocally reassures that the legitimacy and necessity of environmental justice initiatives persist, despite administrative attempts to vilify them.

This administration’s misinterpretation of court cases, including Students for Fair Admission v. Harvard, erroneously equates judicial reviews on racial admissions policies with the broad spectrum of environmental justice efforts. It is crucial to note that the legal context for environmental and climate justice initiatives does not equate to zero-sum scenarios but rather demonstrates their universal benefits.

Courts have upheld that addressing racial disparities can be achieved through alternative methods that do not directly involve race as a criteria for benefits. Recent rulings, such as those pertaining to the American Rescue Plan Act, reiterated the need for the government to explore race-neutral alternatives when implementing supportive measures. This underscores the truth that government policies aimed at combating inequality can be both fair and legal.

Recommitting Ourselves to Advance Environmental Justice

The Multi-State Guidance advocates for action: we must develop and pursue environmental justice initiatives that are lawful and reinforce our moral commitment. Strategies for renewal include:

• Enhancing community engagement through outreach, ensuring that impacted residents have a voice in decisions that will shape their futures.
• Gathering and analyzing relevant data to better understand health and quality-of-life impacts, including pollution sources and access to green spaces.
• Taking proactive steps to mitigate pollution exposure in communities already burdened by environmental hazards.
• Offering support to address challenges concerning contaminated water systems and wastewater services.
• Strengthening community resilience in the face of climate change through strategic planning against extreme weather.
• Strict enforcement of both environmental regulations and civil rights protections in areas facing disproportionate environmental risks.

The path forward may be steep, with the previous administration’s policy rollback threatening to undermine decades of progress. However, the Multi-State Guidance serves as a beacon of clarity and commitment, reaffirming the shared responsibility to ensure that all people have access to a clean, safe, and healthy environment. Together, we can continue to fight for environmental justice and bridge the gaps created by inequality.

Para leer este blog en español, pinche aquí.