Thursday, 11 Dec 2025
  • Contact
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms & Conditions
  • DMCA
logo logo
  • World
  • Politics
  • Crime
  • Economy
  • Tech & Science
  • Sports
  • Entertainment
  • More
    • Education
    • Celebrities
    • Culture and Arts
    • Environment
    • Health and Wellness
    • Lifestyle
  • 🔥
  • Trump
  • VIDEO
  • House
  • ScienceAlert
  • White
  • man
  • Trumps
  • Watch
  • Season
  • Health
Font ResizerAa
American FocusAmerican Focus
Search
  • World
  • Politics
  • Crime
  • Economy
  • Tech & Science
  • Sports
  • Entertainment
  • More
    • Education
    • Celebrities
    • Culture and Arts
    • Environment
    • Health and Wellness
    • Lifestyle
Follow US
© 2024 americanfocus.online – All Rights Reserved.
American Focus > Blog > Environment > EPA Moves to Ignore Power Plant Carbon Emissions, Deny Climate Science 
Environment

EPA Moves to Ignore Power Plant Carbon Emissions, Deny Climate Science 

Last updated: July 16, 2025 8:20 am
Share
EPA Moves to Ignore Power Plant Carbon Emissions, Deny Climate Science 
SHARE

New Article: EPA’s Shocking Proposal to Repeal Carbon Regulations

In a surprising move on June 11, EPA Administrator Lee Zeldin officially established climate denial as EPA policy by proposing to repeal regulations on power plant carbon pollution. This decision, if implemented, would have far-reaching consequences for the environment and public health.

The proposal aims to remove regulations on carbon emissions from current and future fossil fuel-fired power plants, reversing years of progress in reducing greenhouse gas emissions. EPA argues that power plants do not significantly contribute to climate change and therefore should not be regulated. This means that power plants, the largest stationary source of carbon emissions in the US, would no longer be required to limit their emissions.

Furthermore, EPA also put forward an alternative proposal that maintains the obligation to regulate power plant emissions but rejects most existing standards without proposing viable replacements. This approach effectively weakens regulations without providing any real solutions to reduce carbon emissions.

Implications of the Proposal

The proposed repeal would cost society billions of dollars over the next two decades and harm children by increasing various pollutants in the air. Additionally, the proposal sets a dangerous precedent by suggesting that all stationary sources of carbon emissions should go unregulated, potentially undoing years of progress in combating climate change.

However, the proposal is riddled with questionable arguments and lacks proper analysis to justify its radical shift in policy. EPA’s disregard for scientific evidence and public health in favor of industry interests is alarming and must be challenged.

See also  The Power of Nuance: Lessons for Public Health (with Emily Oster)

How to Fight Back

It is crucial for the public to voice their concerns during the open comment period on this regulation. By challenging EPA’s flawed reasoning and misguided priorities, we can push back against this dangerous proposal. Together, we can make a difference and protect our environment for future generations.

TAGGED:CarbonClimateDenyemissionsEPAignoremovesplantPowerScience
Share This Article
Twitter Email Copy Link Print
Previous Article How human eggs stay fresh for decades How human eggs stay fresh for decades
Next Article Morgan Stanley MS earnings Q2 2025 Morgan Stanley MS earnings Q2 2025
Leave a comment

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Popular Posts

Google pulls Gemma from AI Studio after Senator Blackburn accuses model of defamation

Google Removes Gemma AI Model After Accusations of Fabricating Sexual Misconduct Claims Google recently made…

November 2, 2025

Cocoa or green tea could protect you from the negative effects of fatty foods during mental stress, study finds

New research has shown that a cocoa drink rich in flavanols can help protect the…

November 18, 2024

Benjamin Sesko to Manchester United: Red Devils may not have to sell castoffs before landing RB Leipzig star

Manchester United are planning to make a move for RB Leipzig striker Benjamin Sesko as…

July 31, 2025

3 Protein-Rich Foods to Eat Instead of Beef

Beef prices are soaring in the United States, leaving many shoppers wondering where the beef…

July 23, 2025

Georgia Gov. Brian Kemp passes on running for Senate

Georgia Governor Brian Kemp Declines Senate Bid for 2026 In a surprising turn of events,…

May 5, 2025

You Might Also Like

The EPA website got the basics of climate science right. Until last week.
Environment

The EPA website got the basics of climate science right. Until last week.

December 11, 2025
Guest Idea: Low-Waste Family Routines That Support Calmer Homes and Healthier Teen Well-Being
Environment

Guest Idea: Low-Waste Family Routines That Support Calmer Homes and Healthier Teen Well-Being

December 11, 2025
How a species of bamboo could help protect the South from future floods
Environment

How a species of bamboo could help protect the South from future floods

December 11, 2025
Donald Trump and Elon Musk put science on the chopping block in 2025
Tech and Science

Donald Trump and Elon Musk put science on the chopping block in 2025

December 11, 2025
logo logo
Facebook Twitter Youtube

About US


Explore global affairs, political insights, and linguistic origins. Stay informed with our comprehensive coverage of world news, politics, and Lifestyle.

Top Categories
  • Crime
  • Environment
  • Sports
  • Tech and Science
Usefull Links
  • Contact
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms & Conditions
  • DMCA

© 2024 americanfocus.online –  All Rights Reserved.

Welcome Back!

Sign in to your account

Lost your password?