Thursday, 2 Jul 2026
  • Contact
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms & Conditions
  • DMCA
logo logo
  • World
  • Politics
  • Crime
  • Economy
  • Tech & Science
  • Sports
  • Entertainment
  • More
    • Education
    • Celebrities
    • Culture and Arts
    • Environment
    • Health and Wellness
    • Lifestyle
  • 🔥
  • Trump
  • House
  • White
  • ScienceAlert
  • VIDEO
  • man
  • Trumps
  • Season
  • star
  • Years
Font ResizerAa
American FocusAmerican Focus
Search
  • World
  • Politics
  • Crime
  • Economy
  • Tech & Science
  • Sports
  • Entertainment
  • More
    • Education
    • Celebrities
    • Culture and Arts
    • Environment
    • Health and Wellness
    • Lifestyle
Follow US
© 2024 americanfocus.online – All Rights Reserved.
American Focus > Blog > Economy > European and Asian carmakers face steep shipping costs to US on top of tariffs
Economy

European and Asian carmakers face steep shipping costs to US on top of tariffs

Last updated: May 5, 2025 10:25 pm
Share
European and Asian carmakers face steep shipping costs to US on top of tariffs
SHARE

Unlock the Editor’s Digest for free

Roula Khalaf, Editor of the FT, selects her favourite stories in this weekly newsletter.

European and Asian carmakers, already reeling from Donald Trump’s tariffs, face being saddled with steeper costs when shipping vehicles to the US, as Washington’s new port fee policy threatens to wreak havoc on the $150bn American seaborne car import market.

Having been ensnared in the shipping war between Washington and Beijing, car carrier operators will have to pay $150 for every vehicle they have capacity to carry into the US from October. That could equate to additional fees of about $1.8bn a year for the car carrier sector, according to Clarksons Research.

This comes after the US Trade Representative (USTR) in mid-April imposed a blanket fee on all non-US built vessels entering American ports, causing panic in the European, Japanese and South Korean shipping industries.

Lasse Kristoffersen, chief executive of the leading vehicle shipping line Wallenius Wilhelmsen, told the Financial Times the extra costs would end up with carmakers and other customers, and ultimately “the consumer will pay”.

“The uncertainty is so big that you stop making cars, you’re pausing decisions, you’re delaying exports and sourcing of parts,” Kristoffersen said.

The global seaborne car trade, which totalled roughly $600bn last year, involves a fleet of 836 specialised vessels. The new fee regime will cost as much as $1.2mn per US voyage for a large vessel, which the World Shipping Council says can transport 8,000 cars.

Many carmakers face 25 per cent tariffs on foreign-made vehicles imported into the US, and groups from Audi and Jaguar Land Rover to Aston Martin have halted vehicle shipments to the US because of the levies.

See also  'Top Chef' alum Manny Barella opening Riot BBQ in Denver

Mitsui OSK Lines, the world’s second-largest shipowner, said it was worried the new port policy in the US “might impact significantly on the global supply chain of the car industry”.

Andreas Enger, chief executive of Scandinavian car carrier operator Höegh Autoliners, in late April said the new costs would need to be shared by its customers. “It is an uncertainty both on the effect of the tariffs on our customers and the trade flows,” he said at the company’s latest earnings briefing.

Clarksons’ data for 2024 shows the car carrier industry moved a record 29mn vehicles, of which 4.6mn headed to the US.

US efforts to challenge Chinese supremacy in commercial shipbuilding began under Joe Biden’s administration, which opened an investigation in April last year into alleged unfair Chinese economic practices in shipbuilding and maritime logistics.

A bipartisan group of US lawmakers on Wednesday reintroduced the so-called “Ships for America Act” to reboot the US shipbuilding industry.

According to USTR, China’s shipbuilding market share has soared from virtually nothing in the 1990s to more than 50 per cent in 2023, while Chinese ownership of the global commercial fleet has risen to more than 19 per cent as of early 2025.

The new measures are aimed at boosting domestic manufacturing of ships but they were significantly watered down from an earlier proposal to impose fees of up to $1.5mn on ships built in China following warnings from US exporters of higher freight rates and ultimately higher prices for American consumers.

Car carrier operators were caught off-guard with new fees that target not just Chinese but all foreign-built vessels, with no exemptions for frequency of calls that were offered to other segments.

See also  Trump calls SCOTUS tariffs decision 'deeply disappointing' and lays out path forward : NPR

The new fees can be delayed for three years if operators order and take delivery of a car carrier built at a US yard during that period.

World Shipping Council CEO Joe Kramek said: “It’s not realistic. There are no yards in the US that can do it, and the shipbuilding capacity that is in the US is going to hold out for naval contracts because ultimately they’re more profitable.”

Only one vessel in the current global fleet of deep-sea car carriers was built in the US. About a fifth of the current car carrier capacity was built in China, while Japan accounted for 47 per cent. The US only accounted for 0.1 per cent.

Carmakers face a further problem as China accounts for 86 per cent of the new vessels that have been ordered and are being built, according to Clarksons.

Kramek said USTR had decided to impose uncapped fees on all car carriers — not just Chinese-owned or operated vessels — without prior notice to the industry.

Vehicle shipping groups are contesting the legal basis for regulating car carriers made by countries other than the US with some shipping executives hopeful that the fees will be adjusted before their implementation later this year.

Kramek said: “These measures apply to all foreign-build vessels, even though USTR’s stated aim is to curb Chinese behaviours in the commercial shipping market. It does raise questions over whether the USTR has overstepped its authority.”

Additional reporting by Patrick Temple-West in New York

TAGGED:AsiancarmakersCostsEuropeanFaceShippingsteepTariffsTop
Share This Article
Twitter Email Copy Link Print
Previous Article Neuralink Patient Makes YouTube Video With Brain Implant : ScienceAlert Neuralink Patient Makes YouTube Video With Brain Implant : ScienceAlert
Next Article Cops had serial rapist under surveillance when he attacked latest victim, prosecutors say Cops had serial rapist under surveillance when he attacked latest victim, prosecutors say
Leave a comment

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


The reCAPTCHA verification period has expired. Please reload the page.

Popular Posts

The Best Wedding Table Settings in Vogue to Inspire Your Nuptials

Wedding table settings are an essential aspect of any couple's wedding decor, as they serve…

January 3, 2026

Kristi Noem Clears Final Hurdle to Confirmation as DHS Secretary – Senate Vote Expected on Saturday |

South Dakota Governor Kristi Noem is on the verge of becoming the new head of…

January 25, 2025

Trump Accused Of Illegally Abducting Abrego Garcia By Sen. Chris Van Hollen

PoliticusUSA is committed to independent journalism that upholds American values. We invite you to support…

April 16, 2025

Glen Powell Transforms into Phony College QB

Hulu has just unveiled the first teaser trailer for its upcoming half-hour sports comedy series,…

December 28, 2024

‘I Am Jazz,’ ‘America’s Next Top Model’ Producer

Remembering David St. John: A Trailblazing TV Producer David St. John, a talented TV producer…

February 20, 2025

You Might Also Like

1776 and All That: Thomas Jefferson on Adam Smith
Economy

1776 and All That: Thomas Jefferson on Adam Smith

July 2, 2026
TikTok to settle with teen plaintiff before California social media trial, law firm says
Economy

TikTok to settle with teen plaintiff before California social media trial, law firm says

July 1, 2026
Brown & Brown (BRO) Dropped on Softness in Organic Growth
Economy

Brown & Brown (BRO) Dropped on Softness in Organic Growth

July 1, 2026
Former retail giant has closed over 1,000 locations
Economy

Former retail giant has closed over 1,000 locations

July 1, 2026
logo logo
Facebook Twitter Youtube

About US


Explore global affairs, political insights, and linguistic origins. Stay informed with our comprehensive coverage of world news, politics, and Lifestyle.

Top Categories
  • Crime
  • Environment
  • Sports
  • Tech and Science
Usefull Links
  • Contact
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms & Conditions
  • DMCA

© 2024 americanfocus.online –  All Rights Reserved.

Welcome Back!

Sign in to your account

Lost your password?