A petition is underway advocating for a pardon for Shane Lamond, a former lieutenant of the Metropolitan Police Department (MPD) who was convicted in December 2024 for his interactions with supporters of President Donald Trump, including the Proud Boys’ leader, Enrique Tarrio. This initiative aims to highlight the controversial circumstances surrounding his conviction, which stemmed from attempts to prevent confrontations between the Proud Boys and Antifa.
Before his legal troubles, Lamond had a commendable 22-year tenure with the MPD, culminating in a four-year stint as the supervisor of the Intelligence Branch.
His role often involved liaising with Tarrio to ensure the Proud Boys maintained distance from areas where leftist groups were protesting, all in an effort to mitigate potential violence.
In a trial that lasted a week, the notoriously questionable District Court Judge Amy Berman Jackson convicted Lamond of “obstruction of justice” and three counts of “making false statements.” This is the same judge who has faced criticism for her severe sentences of non-violent January 6 defendants, her public remarks against Trump, and her oversight of the trials of high-profile figures like Roger Stone and Paul Manafort.
A petition for Lamond’s pardon, initiated by his sister Nicole, states:
“This petition represents our family’s earnest appeal for justice and an indictment of a system that has failed my brother, Shane Lamond. We respectfully urge President Donald J. Trump to grant a full pardon to Lieutenant Shane Lamond, a distinguished veteran of the Washington, D.C. Metropolitan Police Department, who has been unjustly targeted and convicted amidst a highly politicized atmosphere. While diligently performing his duties as an intelligence officer, he accumulated essential information to ensure the safety of D.C. residents during protests that escalated into violence. He was wrongfully convicted of obstruction and making false statements to federal officers. The injustice lies not in his actions but in a judicial system that has failed to safeguard an innocent man.
“Judge Amy Berman Jackson, who presided over Shane’s case, is notorious for her biased rulings, often perceived as influenced by personal beliefs rather than by objective law. This bias tainted the trial, resulting in a verdict that lacks fairness. Lieutenant Lamond dedicated 23 years to protect and serve the citizens of our nation’s capital, rising to the rank of Lieutenant and commanding the Intelligence Branch of the Metropolitan Police Department. His service was marked by honor and commitment to public safety, even amidst the most divisive times in our nation’s history.
“Shane’s conviction is not a testament to justice but rather a reflection of a polarized political environment where public servants can be subjected to legal and professional persecution. His long-standing service and loyalty to the Constitution deserve acknowledgment, not retribution.
“We implore President Trump to reconsider Shane Lamond’s case and recognize the evident political motivations that led to his prosecution. This situation transcends a mere pardon for Shane; it illuminates deeper flaws in our justice system that allow such injustices to occur. We need your support to rectify this wrong and to elevate Shane’s case to those in power, including President Trump and the DOJ. Your signature can catalyze change. Please sign this petition and advocate for Shane Lamond’s pardon.”
Additionally, Brooke Lamond, Shane’s soon-to-be ex-wife, shared her perspective with :
“In my character reference for Shane during his sentencing hearing, I aimed to convey the integrity and dedication he has shown throughout our 13 years together. Despite our personal differences leading to the end of our marriage, I would never doubt his commitment to his job and the oath he took to protect and serve. He devoted his life to that department and sacrificed greatly. It is disheartening to witness the very system he served for 23 years wrongfully persecute him for fulfilling his duties and safeguarding the residents of D.C.”
Lamond faced accusations of alerting Tarrio about a warrant pertaining to the burning of a Black Lives Matter flag at a prior protest in 2020, which allegedly hindered Tarrio’s attendance at the January 6 protest at the Capitol.
The prosecution contended that Lamond’s actions constituted an obstruction of justice, particularly regarding investigations into the Proud Boys’ involvement in January 6.
Lamond’s defense maintained that he was merely executing his responsibilities in maintaining peace in the city, arguing that authorities had manipulated standard police practices into a criminal offense.
During the trial, Mark Schamel, Lamond’s attorney, contended that Lamond’s actions aligned with his training and duties, accusing the prosecution of misrepresenting routine police work as criminal behavior.
Prior to his release on bail for the flag incident, Tarrio reported that prosecutors approached him seeking information about Lamond. Tarrio clarified that their interactions were professional and primarily focused on informing the Metropolitan Police about the Proud Boys’ presence in the area to ensure public safety while exercising their First Amendment rights.
In defense of Lamond, Tarrio posted on X, stating, “Shane Lamond NEVER shared info with me about my arrest on January 4 for burning a BLM banner. She knew this and still allowed the case to proceed. LT Shane Lamond was prepared to testify at my trial as my key witness. Shortly after including him on our witness list, the DOJ and FBI visited him, informing him he was being ‘investigated’ and advising him against testifying at my trial. This constitutes a direct violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1512, concerning witness tampering. Ultimately, Shane invoked the Fifth Amendment and opted not to testify in my defense.”
IMPORTANT THREAD
PARDON SHANE LAMOND.
DC judge Amy Berman Jackson is…
-The Judge who ILLEGALLY halted the President from dismantling the CFPB through his executive order. https://t.co/MaFhz4eBB7
-The Judge who sentenced J6ers to decades in prison for simply walking into the… https://t.co/YrSR3ax9bk pic.twitter.com/bR34EmWXvd
— Enrique Tarrio (@NobleOne) April 11, 2025
The obstruction charge carries a potential 30-year sentence, with each of the three false statement counts adding another five years. Sentencing is scheduled for April 25, 2025, with prosecutors recommending a 48-month prison term followed by five years of supervised release.
Lamond’s conviction serves as a distressing signal to law enforcement officers grappling with the intricacies of intelligence work.
“If Shane is punished for merely doing his job, what implications does that hold for others tasked with protecting our cities?” questioned a supporter on X, encapsulating the sentiments of many rallying behind the pardon campaign.
It is absolutely unacceptable that Shane Lamond is still facing prosecution.
Ed Martin can intervene.
Pam Bondi can intervene.
If they won’t, (why won’t they, but I digress), then Trump needs to step in again and pardon Shane.What we really need is a DOJ that functions effectively… https://t.co/hsfiHuN3Yd
— Suzzanne Monk (@Trumpertarian) April 11, 2025
To support the call for a pardon, you can sign the petition and utilize the #JusticeForShaneLamond hashtag on social media to amplify the movement.
