Friday, 31 Oct 2025
  • Contact
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms & Conditions
  • DMCA
logo logo
  • World
  • Politics
  • Crime
  • Economy
  • Tech & Science
  • Sports
  • Entertainment
  • More
    • Education
    • Celebrities
    • Culture and Arts
    • Environment
    • Health and Wellness
    • Lifestyle
  • đŸ”„
  • Trump
  • VIDEO
  • House
  • White
  • ScienceAlert
  • Trumps
  • Watch
  • man
  • Health
  • Season
Font ResizerAa
American FocusAmerican Focus
Search
  • World
  • Politics
  • Crime
  • Economy
  • Tech & Science
  • Sports
  • Entertainment
  • More
    • Education
    • Celebrities
    • Culture and Arts
    • Environment
    • Health and Wellness
    • Lifestyle
Follow US
© 2024 americanfocus.online – All Rights Reserved.
American Focus > Blog > Economy > Fewer Rules, Better People: Lam on Legalism’s Moral Cost
Economy

Fewer Rules, Better People: Lam on Legalism’s Moral Cost

Last updated: May 16, 2025 7:03 am
Share
Fewer Rules, Better People: Lam on Legalism’s Moral Cost
SHARE

In his book Fewer Rules, Better People: The Case for Discretion, Lam presents a compelling critique of rigid adherence to rules, illustrating how such inflexibility can lead individuals to make choices that contradict both justice and common sense. One illustrative example involves a woman organizing a roundtable at a conference who found herself thwarted by her institution’s strict catering policy. Despite the roundtable starting at 9:30 AM and the designated vendor not accepting orders until 10:00 AM, the woman discovered that the vendor had a partnership with a nearby Starbucks. She sought permission to order directly from Starbucks, but the administrator’s response was resolute:

“Surely,” the host argued, “this demonstrates that the coffee purchase aligns with the spirit of the rules.” The administrator disagreed, insisting the purchase could not be approved as it contradicted the established regulations.

While it may be tempting to view such bureaucratic rigidity as a mere inconvenience, Lam argues that it represents a more profound issue. Unyielding administrators, obsessed with strict compliance to policy manuals, can be just as detrimental to civil society and moral growth as outright tyranny:

Tyranny has long hindered human flourishing. However, Western liberals often overlook a less overt but equally threatening figure: the by-the-book bureaucrat. These individuals are inherently inclined toward legalism and excessively fearful of exercising discretionary judgement. Faced with uncertainty, they seek solace in governance language, comforted when they can declare an issue beyond their purview. Innovations or novel ideas are often met with resistance unless there are explicit rules endorsing them.

For a thriving society, it is crucial not only to recognize and follow rules but to comprehend the underlying rationale behind them. Rules should serve a larger purpose and not exist in a vacuum. A life governed solely by rigid compliance undermines our moral development and virtue. This phenomenon extends beyond bureaucrats; it also affects citizens who conform to legalistic frameworks:

See also  At COP29, new rules for carbon markets made them even more controversial

Even more concerning is the impact of such societies on the obedient. The aim of a surveillance-state legalism is to transform all citizens into compliance robots and every bureaucrat into a rule-following automaton. This paradigm reduces the rich complexity of human motivation to mere fear of noncompliance, fostering an unhealthy reverence for rules.

Lam draws a personal parallel, reflecting on his duty as a parent to instill not just obedience in his daughter, but an understanding of the why behind her responsibilities:

Our goal in teaching her responsibilities isn’t merely to ensure she follows rules for the sake of rewards or punishments. We want her to care for her bunnies because they are vulnerable beings who depend on their caregivers. She should empty the dishwasher promptly not just to keep the kitchen tidy, but to honor her obligations to those sharing the home. It is crucial to cultivate her understanding of the spirit behind good rules.

We also aim for her to discern when rules may be flawed or when alternative methods could be more effective. Although the temptation exists to enforce rules strictly, such an approach would be a failure on his part:

While imposing harsh, consistent penalties could yield better compliance, if my child becomes the administrator who denies a coffee order, I will have failed in raising a reasonable individual just as much as if I had raised a tyrant. Given a choice between a world of rule-followers and a world of imperfect decision-makers who possess the judgment to uphold the spirit of the rules, I unequivocally choose the latter.

Legalism not only stunts moral agency but also leaves individuals ill-equipped to navigate situations that rules fail to address:

See also  Judge issues temporary order barring layoffs amid government shutdown: ‘It has a human cost’

Unique circumstances demand judgments informed by the rationale behind rules. Those who operate solely out of fear of noncompliance will struggle in such scenarios. Alarmingly, they may apply rules in ways that contradict their intended purposes, acting unjustly under the guise of legality, be it in denying coffee or freedom.

Lam expresses particular concern over the increasing reliance on AI-generated algorithms for decision-making, which further erodes human judgment. The use of AI in this context strips away the possibility of understanding the rationale behind rules:

These algorithms yield equations that defy human comprehension. Although a programmer could present the equation, its complexity would render it nearly indecipherable. The only coherent explanation might be, “This equation best fits all past verdicts.” Deep learning creates a level of opacity that renders rules incomprehensible. This represents the extreme culmination of legalism, where no one understands the regulations governing our lives.

Ultimately, AI operates much like a by-the-book bureaucrat, enforcing rules without context or rationale:

AI resembles a bureaucratic figure, adhering to a rule that forbids coffee purchases from any vendor outside of designated options, offering no justification for why one vendor is acceptable while others are not. When asked to explain the rationale behind such rules, the only response is a reiteration that “it is the rule.”

Lam argues that Han Fei mistakenly viewed legalism as a remedy for mediocrity:

Han Fei believed that legalism countered mediocrity. In contrast, I maintain that legalism breeds mediocrity. Standardization—whether in food, housing, grading, or bureaucracy—produces merely acceptable outcomes, lacking the spark of excellence.

This conversation transcends theoretical discussions about the need for discretion to mitigate the constraints of legalism. For Lam’s insights to translate into practical applications, a clear path forward must be defined. In the next post, I will explore his suggestions for expanding the role of discretion.

See also  Merz backs Nord Stream ban to prevent US and Russia restarting gas link

TAGGED:CostlamLegalismsMoralpeoplerules
Share This Article
Twitter Email Copy Link Print
Previous Article Spectrum broadband owner Charter agrees .5bn cable tie-up with Cox Spectrum broadband owner Charter agrees $34.5bn cable tie-up with Cox
Next Article Gunman gets 6 years for Thanksgiving night shooting on Eisenhower Expressway Gunman gets 6 years for Thanksgiving night shooting on Eisenhower Expressway
Leave a comment

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Popular Posts

Beijing warns countries not to act against China in trade deals with US

The White House Watch newsletter offers a unique perspective on the 2024 US election and…

April 21, 2025

Tiger of Sweden Spring 2026 Menswear Collection

Tiger of Sweden's Spring Collection: A Blend of Modern Style and Swedish Tailoring Tiger of…

June 25, 2025

Police Find Man Caught In A ‘Crazy Scenario’ After Connecticut Burglary Call

Authorities in Bristol, Connecticut had to come to the rescue of a man who found…

June 24, 2025

Tech N9ne Opens Up About Sexual Relationship With His 7th Grade Teacher

Tech N9ne I Was in Love With My 7th Grade Teacher ... During Our Sexual…

April 21, 2025

Top 8 Fall Handbag Trends For A Fashion Statement In 2024

Alternatively, style it with a flowy midi dress and ankle boots for a weekend brunch…

September 20, 2024

You Might Also Like

How Much Does Grocery Delivery App Development Cost in 2025?
Tech and Science

How Much Does Grocery Delivery App Development Cost in 2025?

October 31, 2025
Dan Ives’ AI ETF Hits B in Assets Just Five Months After Launch
Economy

Dan Ives’ AI ETF Hits $1B in Assets Just Five Months After Launch

October 31, 2025
Is This The Best ETF to Invest In Ahead of Potential AI Bubble Burst?
Economy

Is This The Best ETF to Invest In Ahead of Potential AI Bubble Burst?

October 31, 2025
Alphabet hikes capex again after earnings beat on strong ad, cloud demand
Economy

Alphabet hikes capex again after earnings beat on strong ad, cloud demand

October 31, 2025
logo logo
Facebook Twitter Youtube

About US


Explore global affairs, political insights, and linguistic origins. Stay informed with our comprehensive coverage of world news, politics, and Lifestyle.

Top Categories
  • Crime
  • Environment
  • Sports
  • Tech and Science
Usefull Links
  • Contact
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms & Conditions
  • DMCA

© 2024 americanfocus.online –  All Rights Reserved.

Welcome Back!

Sign in to your account

Lost your password?