By MICHAEL LIEDTKE, Associated Press Technology Writer
Google is set to return to federal court on Friday, facing off against the U.S. Justice Department’s efforts to dismantle its internet dominance while also navigating a transition to artificial intelligence that could potentially weaken its grip.
As Google grapples with legal and technological challenges, the closing arguments of the ongoing legal proceedings will focus on the changes that will be enforced on the company following a ruling last year by U.S. District Judge Amit Mehta, declaring its search engine an illegal monopoly.
Based on evidence presented during recent hearings, the Justice Department will push for significant reforms, including prohibiting Google from paying to secure its search engine as the default option on smart devices and mandating the sale of its Chrome browser.
Google’s legal team is expected to argue for more moderate changes, emphasizing the impact of advancements in artificial intelligence that are already reshaping the search landscape. Alternative conversational search options from AI startups pose a potential challenge to Google’s dominance.
Following the closing arguments, Judge Mehta will deliberate over the summer before issuing a ruling prior to Labor Day. Google has indicated its intention to appeal the previous ruling, marking a pivotal moment for the company.
While the role of AI in shaping the industry’s future is acknowledged by both sides, there are differing opinions on how it will impact Google. The Justice Department believes that AI alone will not curb Google’s power, advocating for additional legal constraints to be imposed on the tech giant.
Google has already integrated AI into its search engine, transforming it into an answer engine. This move has helped Google maintain its position as the primary gateway to the internet, despite competition from AI startups like OpenAI and Perplexity.
The Justice Department argues that divesting the Chrome browser could be a significant measure to prevent Google from leveraging massive amounts of browser traffic and personal data to maintain dominance in the AI era. Executives from competing AI startups have expressed interest in acquiring the Chrome browser if a sale is mandated.
The debate over Google’s future has attracted input from various stakeholders, including Apple, legal scholars, and startups. Apple has raised concerns about the proposed restrictions on lucrative agreements with Google, while legal scholars have questioned the implications of forcing Google to share data with rival search engines.
Overall, the outcome of the legal proceedings will have far-reaching implications for the tech industry, with startups and established companies closely watching the developments.
Published: