New Methodology for Consensus Decision Making
When it comes to decision-making processes within a group or assembly, it is essential to have a fair and efficient system in place. One method that has gained popularity is the Modified Borda Count (MBC), which allows for a democratic way of allocating priorities and reaching a consensus.
The MBC was originally devised in 1770 by Jean-Charles de Borda, building upon the Borda Count (BC) first proposed by Nicholas Cusanus in 1433. This methodology involves assigning a “consensus coefficient” (CC) to each agenda item, based on its MBC score in relation to the maximum possible score.
The Rules of Engagement
When proposing a resolution, the mover is given a fixed amount of time to present their draft. Any individual wishing to make changes can submit an amendment, which must then be considered and discussed. The original proposer has the final say on whether to accept or reject any proposed amendments.
The Debate Process
Stage One
During the first stage of the debate, experts provide overviews of various agenda items. Participants then have the opportunity to draft resolutions, with the hope of their proposal being accepted. Collaboration is encouraged, as authors may choose to merge similar drafts to increase the chances of acceptance.
Multiple drafts may be proposed, leading to a series of debates and potential amendments. The original proposer must agree to any changes made to their draft for them to be accepted.
Stage Two
As the debate progresses, the number of drafts under consideration may fluctuate. Participants may be asked to cast their preferences on a selected number of proposals using the MBC methodology. The top-ranked drafts with the highest CC scores are then further discussed.
Progress and Consensus
If a clear consensus is not reached through the debate process, a final vote may be conducted among the remaining draft proposals. The winning draft, with a CC score indicative of consensus, is recommended as a resolution to be discussed at the next meeting.
It is important to note that no majority group should dominate the decision-making process, nor should a minority have the power to veto. The goal is to reach a collective decision that reflects the preferences of all participants.
Peter Emerson, director of the de Borda Institute, emphasizes the inclusive nature of the MBC methodology, which ensures that every participant’s input is taken into account.
