Letitia James Enlists Legal Heavyweight Amid Fraud Allegations
In a striking move reminiscent of a political drama, New York Attorney General Letitia James has secured the services of Abbe Lowell, a defense attorney known for his ability to navigate the treacherous waters of political scandal. This decision appears to be a strategic maneuver aimed at addressing serious allegations concerning her real estate transactions.
Lowell, a partner at Winston & Strawn LLP, has become a go-to for beleaguered political figures, having previously represented the likes of Hunter Biden, John Edwards, and even Bill Clinton during his impeachment proceedings. According to the Times Union, his hiring was executed by the New York State Attorney General’s Office rather than James herself, shortly after a formal criminal referral to the DOJ was filed by officials appointed by former President Trump.
This referral, driven by U.S. Federal Housing Director William Pulte, alleges that James has engaged in dubious real estate and mortgage transactions that span several decades. The gravity of these accusations should not be underestimated, as they suggest a pattern of potential mortgage fraud.
Fraud Allegations: The Key Issues
Reports from and White Collar Fraud have surfaced, detailing three key allegations of mortgage fraud tied to James’ real estate dealings:
-
Misrepresentation of Residency in Virginia: In 2023, James allegedly co-signed a mortgage for a property in Norfolk, Virginia, misleadingly designating it as her “principal residence” within a power of attorney document. (Read more: Revealed: NY Attorney General Letitia James Declares Virginia Home Her ‘Principal Residence’)
-
Brooklyn Property Discrepancy: The Brooklyn home James acquired in 2001 is recorded as a five-unit dwelling in a 24-year-old certificate of occupancy. Nevertheless, she has consistently reported it as a four-unit property for mortgage and tax purposes. (Read more: Big Development: Is Letitia James Guilty of Mortgage Fraud?)
-
Queens Property Irregularity: A mortgage application from 1983 for a Queens property—filled out by James’ late father—mistakenly identified Letitia as his spouse instead of his daughter. (Read more: Mortgage Fraud Alert: Did Letitia James Marry Her Father?)
In response to these mounting accusations, Lowell delivered a six-page letter to Attorney General Pam Bondi, aiming to debunk the claims. His tone, laden with indignation, accuses President Trump of orchestrating a “political retribution” campaign and brands Pulte’s referral as “baseless” and “hypocritical.”
Lowell’s defense hinges on selectively presented evidence, including emails and property records, which he argues illustrate that any inconsistencies were mere oversights rather than intentional fraud. He asserts that James clearly communicated to her mortgage broker that the Virginia property would not serve as her primary residence, citing an email exchange from August 3, 2023, as proof.
Lowell: “Director Pulte’s letter, itself “[b]ased on media reports,” raises three issues: one reference out of an entire file of documents to a property in Virginia being Ms. James’ “principal residence”; one 24-year-old document among a pile of others defining a Brooklyn property as having five dwellings when a loan in question called for only four; and two decades-old references (one 42 years old and the other 24 years old) to documents filled out by Ms. James’ deceased father where he either checked a wrong box or misstated his relationship with Ms. James to be spousal rather than parental.”
Concerning the Brooklyn property, Lowell claims that a 2011 Home Affordable Modification Program application and NYC Department of Finance records confirm it has always operated as a four-unit residence, despite the outdated certificate of occupancy claiming otherwise.
Lowell: “Director Pulte points to a 24-year-old certificate of occupancy listing the property as having five units, despite that the property has functioned as a four-unit residence for the past 24 years since Ms. James bought it.”
As for the Queens property, Lowell contends that the supposed error made by Robert James is insignificant, emphasizing that a contemporaneous deed accurately identified Letitia as his daughter.
Lowell: “In 1983, Ms. James’ father, Robert James sought to buy a home for his family in the Jamaica neighborhood of Queens, New York. He asked his daughter (then a few years out of school) to help by allowing him to add her name to the mortgage application.”
Ultimately, as the narrative unfolds, it becomes evident that this legal saga is as much about political maneuvering as it is about the intricacies of real estate law. With James now under the scrutiny of a seasoned attorney, the outcome remains to be seen, but one thing is certain: the intersection of politics and law is rarely straightforward.
Read the full letter below:
