Friday, 31 Oct 2025
  • Contact
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms & Conditions
  • DMCA
logo logo
  • World
  • Politics
  • Crime
  • Economy
  • Tech & Science
  • Sports
  • Entertainment
  • More
    • Education
    • Celebrities
    • Culture and Arts
    • Environment
    • Health and Wellness
    • Lifestyle
  • 🔥
  • Trump
  • VIDEO
  • House
  • White
  • ScienceAlert
  • Trumps
  • Watch
  • man
  • Health
  • Season
Font ResizerAa
American FocusAmerican Focus
Search
  • World
  • Politics
  • Crime
  • Economy
  • Tech & Science
  • Sports
  • Entertainment
  • More
    • Education
    • Celebrities
    • Culture and Arts
    • Environment
    • Health and Wellness
    • Lifestyle
Follow US
© 2024 americanfocus.online – All Rights Reserved.
American Focus > Blog > Economy > My Weekly Reading for June 8, 2025
Economy

My Weekly Reading for June 8, 2025

Last updated: June 8, 2025 8:00 am
Share
My Weekly Reading for June 8, 2025
SHARE

 

by Billy Binion, Reason, June 5, 2025.

Excerpt:

At the heart of the matter lies a pressing concern—what many perceive as a looming danger to democracy. The New Yorker articulates this apprehension well, focusing on “the far-right shift of the Supreme Court and the conservative movement’s intentions to take control of it.”

This critique has been persistent, as noted in a previous Reason article. Some of the Court’s recent decisions demonstrate why this narrative is both unfair and inaccurate.

The case of Ames v. Ohio Department of Youth Services stands out, where the justices overturned a lower court ruling in favor of a woman who claimed she was a victim of reverse discrimination. In a unanimous decision, the Court ruled that individuals from majority groups do not need to meet an elevated standard to substantiate such claims. The opinion, penned by Justice Jackson, is clear and compelling.

Here’s the key takeaway from Justice Jackson’s opinion:

The Sixth Circuit’s “background circumstances” rule obliges majority-group plaintiffs to shoulder an extra burden at the initial stage. However, Title VII’s disparate-treatment provision makes no distinctions between majority-group and minority-group plaintiffs. The provision emphasizes individual experiences rather than group identities, prohibiting discrimination against “any individual” based on protected characteristics. Congress did not leave room for judicial imposition of special prerequisites on majority-group plaintiffs.

DRH comment: I take issue with the term “reverse discrimination.” Discrimination is discrimination, irrespective of direction.

 

by Jonathan H. Adler, Civitas Institute, June 2, 2025.

Excerpts:

The American Bar Association (ABA) stands as the largest lawyers’ organization in the U.S. While it represents a mere fraction of the legal professionals, it holds the exclusive authority to accredit law schools. Unlike universities, which are often accredited by regional bodies, the ABA’s Section of Legal Education and Admissions to the Bar monopolizes this space. Given that federal student loans are contingent upon accreditation, and most states mandate a degree from an ABA-accredited institution to sit for the bar exam, could this status quo be on the verge of change?

As legal education costs soar and technological innovations threaten the traditional delivery of legal services, the ABA’s tight grip on legal accreditation faces increasing scrutiny. Both Texas and Florida, states boasting the third and fourth largest lawyer populations, are contemplating the elimination of the ABA accreditation requirement for bar applicants. Concurrently, the Trump Administration is advocating for the expansion of accreditation options. An Executive Order issued in April directs the Department of Education to enhance scrutiny of current accrediting bodies while expediting the approval of new accreditors to “foster competition and accountability in promoting high-quality, high-value academic programs centered on student outcomes.”

And:

See also  Read Like a Champion (with Doug Lemov)

Whether the ABA perceives itself as a cartel or not, much of its accreditation behavior resembles that of a self-serving cartel. Consequently, many of the ABA’s accreditation criteria are predicated on expensive inputs, such as library resources and the number of full-time, tenured faculty, which bear no proven correlation to a student’s success on the bar exam or their effectiveness as legal practitioners. These stringent requirements, however, have contributed to the escalating costs of obtaining a law degree and have stifled innovation within legal education.

 

by Christian Britschgi, Reason, June 5, 2025.

Excerpt:

While one might commend Fielder’s proposal, it would arguably perform as effectively as the 1,500-hour rule (meaning not at all), yet would incur far less cost.

No other nation mandates its airline pilots to accumulate as extensive flight hours as the U.S. does.

Neither the Federal Aviation Administration (which oversees aviation safety) nor the National Transportation Safety Board (which investigates accidents) has established any link between the 1,500-hour rule and enhanced safety outcomes.

(Notably, the pilots involved in the Colgan crash each had over 1,500 hours of flying experience.)

Critics assert that the 1,500-hour requirement may actually compromise safety by compelling pilots to log endless hours on routine flights rather than undergoing more productive simulator training.

Regional airlines report that this rule has hindered pilot recruitment, leading to a shortage of qualified pilots and a decline in regional airline services.

DRH comment: A more effective training approach for pilots, in terms of benefits and costs per hour, would be to have them spend significant time in simulators. Why? Because simulators can replicate real-life emergency scenarios that a trainee might never encounter during their 1,500 hours of actual flying. Moreover, they can recreate a multitude of emergency situations. This insight was shared by a retired American Airlines pilot who now trains new pilots.

See also  Saudi Arabia and Qatar to repay Syria’s debts to World Bank

 

Editorial, Wall Street Journal, June 5, 2025 (June 6 print version.)

Excerpts:

Let’s begin with the CBO’s estimate that 5.2 million able-bodied adults on Medicaid would lose coverage due to the bill’s work requirements. This undermines the Democratic assertion that only a limited number of able-bodied individuals on Medicaid are unemployed. Regardless, the work requirement could motivate some to seek gainful employment that offers health insurance—a commendable objective of the legislation.

DRH comment: This quote implies that the CBO assumes none of these able-bodied adults will secure jobs. That’s rather astonishing. It’s hard to fathom the CBO being so short-sighted. I’ll have to review the CBO study later.

The CBO projection also anticipates that 1.4 million undocumented migrants would lose coverage, primarily due to the bill’s reduction of federal matching funds for states extending Medicaid to undocumented individuals. Additionally, the bill prohibits ObamaCare subsidies for many non-permanent immigrants and asylum seekers, which the CBO estimates would further decrease coverage by one million.

DRH comment: This is a positive development, not a negative one. I have consistently advocated, alongside a substantial increase in legal immigration, that the government should not subsidize healthcare or health insurance for undocumented immigrants. Furthermore, whatever actions the government takes regarding legal immigration, it should refrain from subsidizing healthcare or health insurance for those who are in the country illegally.

 

Note: The accompanying picture was created by ChatGPT.

TAGGED:JuneReadingWeekly
Share This Article
Twitter Email Copy Link Print
Previous Article Donald Trump’s investment deals are a mirage Donald Trump’s investment deals are a mirage
Next Article Keith Urban, Shaboozey, Wynonna Judd and More Perform at CMA Fest 2025 Keith Urban, Shaboozey, Wynonna Judd and More Perform at CMA Fest 2025
Leave a comment

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Popular Posts

Top 8 Fall Handbag Trends For A Fashion Statement In 2024

Alternatively, style it with a flowy midi dress and ankle boots for a weekend brunch…

September 20, 2024

3 Tips To Adjust Your Sleep Schedule For Daylight Savings Transition

As Fall Daylight Savings approaches on November 3, many people eagerly anticipate gaining an extra…

October 30, 2024

How Trump’s mass layoffs raise the risk of wildfires say fired workers

By ALEXANDRA JONES and DANIELLE SMITH, Staff WritersSEATTLE (AP) — Following the termination of thousands…

February 21, 2025

AJ Styles issues statement after his X/Twitter account gets hacked

Former WWE Champion AJ Styles recently faced a troublesome situation when his official Twitter/X account…

May 3, 2025

Retailers, police team up on crime

In a collaborative effort to combat retail crime in Invercargill, police and retailers have joined…

June 22, 2025

You Might Also Like

Market analysts react to Trump-Xi meet
Economy

Market analysts react to Trump-Xi meet

October 31, 2025
29 truck carrier files Chapter 11
Economy

29 truck carrier files Chapter 11

October 31, 2025
Trust Government Statistics, Not Government
Economy

Trust Government Statistics, Not Government

October 31, 2025
Jefferies Raises BP Price Target to 420 GBp, Maintains Hold Rating
Economy

Jefferies Raises BP Price Target to 420 GBp, Maintains Hold Rating

October 31, 2025
logo logo
Facebook Twitter Youtube

About US


Explore global affairs, political insights, and linguistic origins. Stay informed with our comprehensive coverage of world news, politics, and Lifestyle.

Top Categories
  • Crime
  • Environment
  • Sports
  • Tech and Science
Usefull Links
  • Contact
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms & Conditions
  • DMCA

© 2024 americanfocus.online –  All Rights Reserved.

Welcome Back!

Sign in to your account

Lost your password?