The Biden administration is facing backlash for its latest proposal to effectively ban cigarettes in the final days of the administration. The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) is working on a regulatory rule that would require cigarettes on the market to have lower nicotine levels, ultimately pushing consumers towards products with reduced nicotine content. This move has sparked concerns about the potential consequences, including the creation of a lucrative black market for cigarettes.

Critics argue that the ban on cigarettes could inadvertently benefit organized crime cartels, such as Mexican drug cartels, Chinese organized crime groups, and Russian mafia. Rich Marianos, a former assistant director of the U.S. Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives, expressed his concerns about the proposal, stating that it could lead to increased violence on the streets and keep America smoking.

The FDA has confirmed that the Tobacco Product Standard for Nicotine Level of Certain Tobacco Products has completed a regulatory review, but the proposed rule has not yet been finalized. Despite the intentions behind the ban, experts warn that history has shown that heavy-handed approaches like Prohibition can backfire, leading to the emergence of billion-dollar black markets and turf wars.

Critics like Ward Clark from RedState highlight the potential consequences of the ban, drawing parallels to failed prohibition attempts in the past. The fear is that banning cigarettes could lead to unintended consequences, including increased criminal activity and a surge in black-market sales.

Social media users have also weighed in on the issue, questioning the logic behind limiting nicotine in cigarettes when smoking rates are already at a historic low. There are concerns that restrictions could drive consumers to seek alternative sources of nicotine, potentially fueling the demand for illicit products.

With the Biden administration’s push to ban cigarettes, some are left wondering what could be next on the chopping block. Could junk food be the next target for government intervention? The debate over personal choice and government regulation continues as the administration moves forward with its efforts to curb smoking.