Totally Unbiased PBS Does Fawning Interview With Nancy Pelosi: ‘There’s a Lot of Applause in the Room Here for You’ (VIDEO) |

Recently, former President Trump advocated for the defunding of National Public Radio (NPR) and the Public Broadcasting Service (PBS) through a new executive order—an initiative that has sparked considerable debate. Critics argue that these public media outlets, while funded by taxpayer money, often alienate a significant portion of the American populace with their editorial choices and perceived biases.

Take, for instance, PBS’s recent interview with former House Speaker Nancy Pelosi, which was characterized by a level of adulation that some might find excessive. During the segment, host Geoff Duncan expressed enthusiasm about the audience’s reaction, stating, “You might not be able to hear it, but there’s a lot of applause in the room here for you!” To which Pelosi responded, “Thank you, PBS!”

This moment raises an important question: Are conservative taxpayers really inclined to support programming that seems to celebrate one political figure while sidelining others?

As highlighted by a post from Western Lensman on Twitter/X:

After a half-hour fawning “interview,” PBS host Geoff Duncan gushes to Nancy Pelosi:

“You might not be able to hear it, but there’s a lot of applause in the room here for you!”

Pelosi: “Thank you, PBS!”

Such interactions might provoke skepticism about PBS’s claim to neutrality.

This is hysterical. After a half-hour fawning “interview,” PBS host Geoff Duncan gushes to Nancy Pelosi:

“You might not be able to hear it, but there’s a lot of applause in the room here for you!”

Pelosi: “Thank you, PBS!”

Totally ‘non-partisan’ stuff here! pic.twitter.com/dXzJYFi4jn

— Western Lensman (@WesternLensman) May 3, 2025

Many observers are quick to note the apparent disparity in how PBS covers political figures. One commenter remarked, “They gush over Democrats and are hostile to Republicans. It’s very obvious. And that’s why we shouldn’t be funding them.”

They gush over Democrats and are hostile to Republicans. It’s very obvious. And that’s why we shouldn’t be funding them.

— Ellie A (@EllieGAnders) May 3, 2025

Another pointed out a particularly revealing question from the interview, which was framed as, “Democrat policies have objectively helped the middle class; what can Democrats do to help get that message across?”

One of his ‘questions’ was: “Democrat policies have objectively helped the middle class; what can Democrats do to help get that message across?”

Seriously.

— Western Lensman (@WesternLensman) May 3, 2025

The counterargument is equally vocal, with critics suggesting that the reality is the opposite of what is portrayed. Comments like, “There’s good reason why the working class has been leaving the Democratic party. Because of bad trade policy, identity politics and luxury beliefs, like the open border,” underscore a growing discontent with the Democratic narrative among working-class voters.

The opposite is true. There’s good reason why the working class has been leaving the Democratic party. Because of bad trade policy, identity politics and luxury beliefs, like the open border.

— Ellie A (@EllieGAnders) May 3, 2025

If PBS intends to continue its trend of adoring coverage for Pelosi and her Democratic colleagues, perhaps it should consider doing so without the financial support of taxpayers. After all, there are plenty of wealthy benefactors in Hollywood who might be eager to fund such endeavors.