Here’s why he’s wrong., The Guardian
Lend me your ears
STAT’s Kate Sheridan stopped by the STAT office this week to chat about three stories she’s been following. Listen in to hear about a new gene therapy that could help people with a rare disease build muscle, how a newly approved drug could change the treatment landscape for cystic fibrosis, and why some people with diabetes are turning to a controversial diet to manage their blood sugar.
Data dive
Big Pharma is about to get even bigger. The top 30 drugmakers are expected to rake in a combined $1 trillion in revenues this year, according to an analysis by STAT’s finance reporter, Ed Silverman. That’s up from $963 billion last year and marks a 9.7% increase. The jump is partly due to the removal of some Covid-19-related hurdles, but will also be driven by new drug launches and sales of existing blockbusters. Check out Ed’s story for more details.
Early birds and night owls
Early birds were up and at ‘em today to read STAT’s new Morning Rounds newsletter. Have you signed up yet? Get your daily dose of health and medicine in your inbox every weekday morning — sign up here.
What to read around the web today
- How a new gene therapy helped a boy with a rare disease build muscle, NPR
- Is the end of the pandemic near? Or are we just redefining it?, The New York Times
- How scientists are using bacteria to fight cancer, BBC Future
Until tomorrow, stay safe and stay informed. If you have any tips or story ideas, send them my way at [email protected].
The article from The Guardian discusses the controversial issue of transgender women in sports, particularly in response to former President Donald Trump’s comments on the matter. Trump has been vocal about his belief that transgender women should not be allowed to compete in women’s sports, citing concerns about fairness and competition.
The author of the article, Austin Killips, provides a thoughtful and nuanced response to Trump’s stance. Killips argues that transgender women should be allowed to participate in sports based on their gender identity, rather than their assigned sex at birth. He emphasizes the importance of inclusivity and respect for transgender individuals, highlighting the discrimination and challenges they face in society.
Killips also addresses the misconception that transgender women have an unfair advantage in sports due to their biological differences. He points out that there is a lack of scientific evidence to support this claim and stresses the need for a more inclusive and understanding approach to transgender rights in sports.
Overall, Killips’ response is a powerful defense of transgender rights and a call for greater acceptance and support for transgender individuals in all aspects of society. The article serves as a reminder of the importance of empathy, respect, and equality for all individuals, regardless of their gender identity.
As we reflect on the issues raised in this article, it is crucial to consider the perspectives of all individuals and strive towards a more inclusive and equitable society for everyone. Let us continue to advocate for the rights and dignity of transgender individuals in sports and beyond.
