As the digital age thrives, an influx of data center projects is sweeping across the United States, yet they are not without controversy. A mix of secretive agreements and enticing tax breaks has stirred apprehension among local communities, spurring a backlash against these technological behemoths.
From the peach orchards of Georgia to the rugged landscapes of Oregon, and from the quaint towns of New England to the arid expanses of New Mexico, residents are raising their voices in local government meetings. Their concerns revolve around the immense appetite for resources these data centers display—particularly in terms of electricity, water usage, and noise pollution. Detractors argue that these centers fail to create the jobs that other uses of land might generate.
In Texas, the conversation shifts toward a broader concern about the rapid industrialization of rural areas, with small towns grappling with the implications of such development. In Pennsylvania, grassroots organizations are sounding alarms about data centers tapping into local natural gas reserves, amplifying fracking activities and straining vital water resources.
Residents in Indiana, Minnesota, Kansas, and Nebraska are voicing their discontent over how the size and proximity of these tech hubs can diminish neighborhood quality and property values. The objections vary by location and project specifics, but a recurring theme is the discontent with state and local governments offering tax incentives for data center projects that often remain concealed under nondisclosure agreements.
Proponents of these confidentiality agreements claim they protect sensitive corporate information, yet this lack of transparency fuels local resentment, especially when communities find themselves blindsided by proposals that seem to be rubber-stamped without adequate public discussion. “The absence of community outreach is alarming,” noted Kamil Cook, Texas climate and clean energy associate at Public Citizen, in a conversation with The Epoch Times. “There’s no effective way for residents to feel heard or valued in this process.”
This local resistance seems deeply rooted in a shared sentiment: residents feel they were neither informed nor consulted. A survey from HostingAdvice.com, which sampled 800 individuals across 16 states, revealed that while 93% believe advanced AI data centers are crucial for the U.S., only 35% would accept one in their community.
“There’s an evident disconnect between local residents’ experiences and what developers promise,” remarked Joe Warnimont, co-author of the study. In one instance, Protect PT executive director Gillian Graber expressed dismay over how her nonprofit learned about a proposed data center in Westmoreland County only through a newspaper article. “What is this? What does this mean for our community?” she recalled asking local officials, who appeared as clueless as the residents.
Founded a decade ago in Graber’s living room to combat fracking and other industrial incursions that threaten local environments, Protect PT continues to rally against what they perceive as corporate overreach. “History seems to repeat itself, with large corporations thinking they can impose their will on rural communities,” she lamented.
A quick glance at social media reveals a plethora of grassroots groups echoing similar frustrations. In Granbury, Texas, locals argue that the burden of operating next to massive, noisy data centers falls squarely on the shoulders of working-class residents. Minnesotans are lobbying for stricter regulations, fearing that these developments fundamentally alter the character of their communities.
In Indiana, a Facebook group with 3,500 members, Stop Duneland and Valpo/Wheeler Data Centers, is filled with comments lamenting the absence of public hearings on proposed projects, expressing sentiments like “Are we living in a dictatorship?”
Tax Revenue Boon
While the opposition is palpable, the Data Center Coalition, representing a number of major tech companies such as Meta, AWS, and Microsoft, acknowledges the pushback but maintains that such resistance is typical for any new development. “The media often overlooks that data centers aspire to be good neighbors, engaging with homeowners’ associations and local governments throughout the permitting process,” stated Jon Hukill, the coalition’s communications director.
Hukill emphasized that data centers, which require significant upfront investment and long-term operation, adhere strictly to laws and zoning regulations. He noted that while these facilities receive tax incentives, they are not uniquely privileged compared to other types of developments.
A recent survey from land-use law firm Husch Blackwell revealed that 36 states have some form of legislation allowing tax incentives for data center development, although the structure of these incentives varies greatly. According to Hukill, developers often seek sales tax exemptions for the substantial hardware costs—servers that necessitate regular upgrades every three to five years—as a significant investment.
These tax incentives are not merely “breaks” but rather strategic investments that can yield substantial returns for local economies. A PriceWaterhouseCoopers report indicated that the data center sector contributed a whopping $727 billion to the U.S. GDP in 2023, illustrating the potential economic impact of these facilities.
Colleen Gillis, a land-use attorney in northern Virginia’s “Data Center Alley,” highlighted that data centers can generate a five-to-one ratio in tax revenue compared to other commercial developments, encompassing property taxes, personal property taxes, and fees. Gillis, who contributed to a December 2024 report on data center development guidelines, argued that structured negotiations on tax abatements can benefit municipalities significantly.
In Virginia, data centers qualifying for substantial capital investments may enjoy sales tax exemptions while creating high-paying jobs, making the overall economic equation quite appealing.
‘More Pluses Than Minuses’
In central Washington, Patrick Boss, the public affairs director for Port of Quincy, celebrates the economic windfall data centers have brought to his community. Quincy, once an agricultural hub, has transformed dramatically since Microsoft acquired land for data center construction.
Boss noted that Quincy’s assessed value skyrocketed from $500 million in 2006 to approximately $8.5 billion today, highlighting a remarkable increase. Local infrastructure has benefited, resulting in new schools and hospitals funded partly through property taxes generated by data centers.
“Overall, I’d say the benefits have far outweighed the drawbacks,” Boss concluded.
‘New Stadium Scam’
Conversely, Marc Oestreich, an energy newsletter editor and land-use consultant, warns against the potential pitfalls of data center incentives. He draws parallels with sports stadium financing, labeling data centers as “the new stadium scam.” Oestreich argues that cities often provide developers with excessive incentives that fail to yield promised benefits for taxpayers.
Pointing to various examples, he highlights long-term tax abatements that effectively allow companies to recoup their own property taxes, which he argues is a misallocation of public funds. His skepticism extends to the infrastructure strain data centers may impose on local utilities, often leading to increased costs passed onto consumers.
According to Oestreich, local governments must critically assess whether data centers would establish themselves without the subsidies, which is often the case. He asserts that companies typically choose sites based on existing infrastructure and workforce capabilities rather than financial incentives. He urges municipalities to reconsider their approach to development, advocating for fair and competitive regulations that do not favor specific applicants.
Ultimately, while the development of data centers can indeed bring substantial benefits, Oestreich emphasizes the importance of transparent dealings, arguing that communities should avoid hidden costs and ensure that developers contribute fairly to local infrastructure demands.
If you found this article interesting, please consider supporting traditional journalism
Our first edition was published 25 years ago from a basement in Atlanta. Today, The Epoch Times brings fact-based, award-winning journalism to millions of Americans.
Our journalists have faced threats, arrests, and assaults, but our commitment to independent journalism has never wavered. This year marks our 25th year of independent reporting, free from corporate and political influence.
That’s why you’re invited to a limited-time introductory offer — just $1 per week — so you can join millions already celebrating independent news.
